User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:22, 6 March 2008

Edit this page

This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tiptoety/Archive 8. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

vn-50

This user talk page has been vandalized 50 times.

Wikimood

[purge]	[edit]

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Deleted radio lists

Hi,

Could you please restore the following radio station lists?

These lists organize radio stations exactly the way the radio industry does, by Arbitron market. These lists also contain information, such as branding, owners and formats which have not been included in the List of radio stations in California which was claimed to have "deprecated" these lists. RadioStationWorld is another source which organizes radio stations by market areas. While these lists were admittedly incomplete, I have intended to work on them to fill them out, but I have been on extended wikibreak due to more pressing work and life priorities. Thank you. DHowell (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to provide you with copies of the deleted material which you can then recreate as you see appropriate, though I would recommend that you merge some of the lists together to avoid a future PROD tag being placed on them (or even an AfD for that matter). Tiptoety ^talk 15:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those copies can be found here. Tiptoety ^talk 15:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your adminship

Thank you for stepping up to help the project. Feel free to call on me if I can be of any assistance to you. --SSBohio 19:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will do. Tiptoety ^talk 19:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thnaks for your hard work.

I would just like to say (while my connection is backlogged with reverts and warns) thanks for all of my block requests in AIV that you have blocked. There is way to much vandalism atm. Just hope it will stop soon. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, glad to help out. Tiptoety ^talk 20:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now get back to blocking people!! ^^ :D ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, on my way there right now :D Tiptoety ^talk 20:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

Hi Tiptoety, just wanted to say congratulations on becoming admin, and thanks for all your hard work. I'm sure your enthusiasm for keeping things humming around here will be a great asset to the project! -Pete (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I also appreciate your comments on my RfA and hope to spend some time soon working on articles. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 01:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Complex Issue

Hi, can you please have a look here I don't know what to do, but I checked the existence of the book, it does exist, but the others, I need you to mediate. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 04:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Take to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, explain the issue and some users will check to see if the book does exist, and if not deal with it from there. Tiptoety ^talk 04:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Barnstar of Diligence/The 41 Barnstar
		Should also be called the 41 barnstar. Thanks for the help. Malinaccier (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, your welcome. That was very odd editing behavior, then did you see the message he left on his talk.....hmm....makes you wonder. Thanks for the shiny! :D Tiptoety ^talk 01:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

How long did it end up taking to clean up that mess, 41 minutes? :D —Travis ^talk 03:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, yea something like that. That was by far some of the strangest editing behavior i have ever seen, then after he was blocked, he left a note saying it was expected he was just on a rampage. He probably has 41 other accounts to go do the same thing with :) Tiptoety ^talk 03:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh, I hope not :O —Travis ^talk 03:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know, that would mean (100 page moves X 41 accounts) 4100 page moves to fix...AHHH! Tiptoety ^talk 03:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in 24

Hey, I just thought I'd tell you, I've changed my mind. I'm going to do the above article to improve as a 24 article, I'm adding references as was asked, even though I think it's ridiculous. And im removing the excessive info next to the characters, such as what they did in each day etc. It's not necessary. Would improving that article qualify? Also can you post a {{talkback}} template on my page? Thanks. And im at 4300+ edits now :) Steve Crossin (talk) 03:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that article is just fine. All my requirements where is that you significantly edit an article of your interest. 4300+ ooo.... you are getting so close to graduating! :P Tiptoety ^talk 03:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then. It will take me maybe an hour to find citations for all of them. I'm trying to find newspaper articles, but if worst comes to worst, can I use IMDB? After I've added citations, I'll remove the tag, then can you review it, and tell me if its OK? Steve Crossin (talk) 03:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, that is alright. Are you going to be doing any other work on the article, other than finding references that is? Tiptoety ^talk 04:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I said, there is some excessive info in the article. If you check the articles edit history, you will see I've removed some excessive info. Also, I've got a question. If you use a citation more than once, how do you do that? Steve Crossin (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. If you look here it shows you how to. Tiptoety ^talk 04:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that seems simple enough. I think I'm going OK, what do you think? And, also, I should have my 5000 edits by the end of the day, if not then, it will be within 24 hours, easily. I apparently have a case of WP:ECT. How do you think the article I'm editing is going? :)

Looks good, one suggestion would be to place brackets "[external link]" around the external links in the references, it just looks better. Tiptoety ^talk 04:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean at the bottom of the page? Could you show me exactly what you mean? As in, paste the code in here, with the nowiki tags :) Steve Crossin (talk) 04:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No at the references at the bottom, but in the actual ref itself, i noticed that you did not place brackets around it, hence why you can see the whole URL code at the bottom in the reference section. If that is not clear, let me know. Tiptoety ^talk 04:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that. Lol. I know exactly what you mean now. I've fixed that :) Thanks.Steve Crossin (talk) 04:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question, I'm a little concerned. Currently, in the article, I'm removing the description next to each character, as I believe they are unnecessary, as it's really just a basic list. Can you look at the edit summaries and tell me if I should keep each characters descriptions? I just think they are unnecessary. Steve Crossin (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any issue with it. Though I would recommend that you leave a not on the talk page of the article stating what you are doing and why, that way other editors who watch that page can give their thoughts on it as well. Tiptoety ^talk 05:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have a look at the article and tell me what you think of it? Are there enough references? Or are more needed? Not enough references is the tag on the article that is an issue. Steve Crossin (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Rollback

Hi there, thanks for pointing that out. I've actually had rollback for some time, but it was recently removed (I haven't bothered to update my userspace as hopefully it will be back soon :-). The comment from Ral315 was the result of a request for the situation to be reviewed on IRC. I've actually been looking for someone else to review the reasons and such (all on AzaToth's talk page) - I'm sure AzaToth will reinstate it when they get back online, it's just a pain doing it the TW way in the mean time. Cheers, Pump me up 06:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So I guess that's a no for giving it back - I don't think I'll bother to remove it (it involves messing with my userspace I finally got just nice) - several admins have said they will give it back in the near future anyway :-). Cheers, Pump me up 06:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet as. I won't be removing it - I can display the box on my userpage even if I never have it. Thanks for your understanding :-) --Pump me up 06:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just got your message after posting there. I believe there's not (don't ask me for a link, I can't remember where I found this info). I had a similar issue with a user on the Commons and recall that the Wikipedia policy was similar, that a logo or userbox is not an "official thing" (only the user right's log is). Anyway it will be interesting to find out. Cheers, Pump me up 06:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like rollback

Although WP:Twinkle gives me rollback to a degree, i'd still like to have the full feature. I suppose you can't have to many tools in the fight against vandalism! Thanks, and have a nice day! TheProf | 2007 12:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tiptoety ^talk 15:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graduating??

Hello. I think I've done the requirements. See my user page for my edit counts, and List of 24 characters for the work I've done on this. Added 33 references, cleaned it up a bit. What do you think?Steve Crossin (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, the article looks much better and it appears as if you have over 5000 edits. I would say its time to dawn your cap and gown. You have graduated. Congratulations! Tiptoety ^talk 15:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		For being the one who has turned me from a user who had no idea on Wikipedia, into a Wikipedian who can contribute in a much better way than I thought possible, and for giving me the reason to fight vandals that I do now have, I award you this barnstar, and I sincerely thank you. Steve Crossin (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now, one other thing. We were discussing Admin Coaching. What would you suggest? And, for the record, do you think you would ever support me in an RFA? :P Steve Crossin (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are very welcome, it was a pleasure. I highly recommend that you do admin coaching, to request a coach add your name to this page. Also I would be willing to support you in an RfA, but in the very distant future. Cheers, and best of luck. Tiptoety ^talk 15:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just checked the Admin Coaching program. It says here the guideline for starting an Admin Coaching, number of active months on Wikipedia, as 4 months. It says if you do not meet these requirements, consider Adoption. But I've already been adopted. What would you suggest? Steve Crossin (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the reason that they send you back to the adoption program is that by the time users relieve there is a adoption or admin coach program they usually already have 3 months under their belt. My recommendation is that you wait until you have 4 months experience, contribute to many areas of the project then request coaching. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 16:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well, I could always round myself out. As in, get more involved with XFDs, with the Help Desk. I also want to help fix linkrot, there is a massive backlog there, but I'm confused with how to use this tool. Which is a shame, if I knew how to do this sort of stuff, I could contribute more. And I think I will try working on my task list a bit more, those articles are not going to rewrite themselves :P. But, I think they might make an exception if I met all the other criteria. The page said that not meeting one of those criteria does not necessarily rule you out of the program. :) Steve Crossin (talk) 16:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, working around some project space is good. I am not sure which tool you are referring to, otherwise I would help you. Tiptoety ^talk 18:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to the tool that checks the status of links on a page. Here is an example. Steve Crossin (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, not sure how to use that either. Tiptoety ^talk 19:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Huggle on AndonicO

Thanks for the heads up on my edit count but I checked and that was total edits, I can't apply for Huggle until I've got more than 1000 mainspace edits (I've got about 360 at the moment) and a good history of using another programme on WP. WHilst I'm firmly in the number of edits does not a good user make camp, it's a problem with the sytem which cannott be changed on this one unfortunately. BigHairRef | Talk 17:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message

And in regards to that tool I mentioned above, could you see if you can find someone who knows how to use it? I think I could do a lot of good work with that tool, only if I knew how to use it. Steve Crossin (talk) 19:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, or how about you try the help desk? They might know. Tiptoety ^talk 19:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback rights

Hi, I am User:Abrech and I am currently often engaged in fighting Vandalism. Is it already possible for me to be granted rollback rights? It would make it a lot easier for me to carry on fighting Vandals. I know my editcount is not extremely high yet. However, I hope my edits show already now that there is no risk I would abuse such extended right. Kind regards, --Abrech (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please take a look at Wikipedia:Rollback feature and if you would like to add a userbox to your page it is {{user wikipedia/rollback}}. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 19:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dj Perry: hoax?

Yo, you commented in an edit summary that the article Dj Perry was "obviously a hoax". Would you care to elaborate? скоморохъ 18:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I was simply stating that while the article asserted notability it still appeared to be a hoax and that it should be taken to AfD opposed to speedily deleted. Hope that clears it up, Tiptoety ^talk 19:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I understand your rationale re: CSD vs Afd, but what I am wondering why you think/thought it is/was a hoax - it seems legit to me. Regards, скоморохъ 19:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well reading over it again, it looks like less of hoax than originally thought, but i am just not able to find any good sources (outside of myspace) that assert this person is in fact who the article claims him to be. While i see that he as a page at imdb.com it almost appears it is fake, as there are no other sources to back up the claims on that page, to my understanding anyone can edit imdb.com , Hope that helps. Tiptoety ^talk 19:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. скоморохъ 19:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I hope that you are able to find some good sources so that this article came be improved instead of sent to AfD. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 19:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletionof WhipKraft

Dear Tiptoety,

I am writing in regard to your deletion of the SF band WhipKraft. I am confused as to why a band like this would be deleted? Being quite familiar with all kinds of music and having written books about metal bands especially the underground genre, this band had quite a bearing on the SF community and still does. In addition to my books, this band has been written about by other editors in two published books, which you can do a search on amazon.

Your input is very welcome. Thank you ZZ