User talk:Scarian: Difference between revisions
→Voting: new section |
→Baseball: the falsifier log |
||
Line 367: | Line 367: | ||
:Yeah, well deserved. Happy early birthday and try to stay off Wikipedia as much as possible for a few days. :) '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup><font color="orange">msg!</font></sup></b>]]'' 18:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
:Yeah, well deserved. Happy early birthday and try to stay off Wikipedia as much as possible for a few days. :) '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup><font color="orange">msg!</font></sup></b>]]'' 18:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
::And when you do come back.... the "falsifier" is now editing as IP 66.143.119.148. I will keep a running log of this vandal here (if you don't mind) just so I have a list of IPs to jog my mamory from time to time. And no that's not a typo (I just feel like a t*thead) :D. [[Special:Contributions/156.34.210.47|156.34.210.47]] ([[User talk:156.34.210.47|talk]]) 23:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Vote Wanted == |
== Vote Wanted == |
Revision as of 23:48, 17 March 2008
![]() | Scarian is currently wikibonked and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Hitting the wall is a temporary condition, and the user should return to normal edit levels in time. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
Message from my partner:Hello, Pat. I love you. --DeaaaaCall me Gertrude 17:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Ahhh protsYou put a prot on my favourite page. If any additions get stuck into it from any "new single purpose accounts" can I get you to do my standard "cleanup re: lead-in" edit to help maintain the integrity of the list? 156.34.231.56 (talk) 16:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Kurt CobainIf his first experience with marijuana was in 1980, that would have made him 13, seeing as he was born in 1967. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoseInWinter (talk • contribs) 17:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough. But I know for sure that he said in one Rolling Stone interview that his stomach wasn't bothering him anymore. I just need to dig it up, but Justice for Kurt does offer citations for quotes. The basic math stands. 1980-1967 is 13, not 14. You can't spell it out any more than that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoseInWinter (talk • contribs) 17:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Arjuna808Aloha. Please review the comments I have made about Arjuna808's block here. Thank you. —Viriditas | Talk 02:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Another Huggle struggler?Jj137 (talk · contribs) is either a huggle newbie or doesn't know what WP:VAN is. 156.34.225.50 (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the help!Hey Scarian, I wanted to stop by and say thanks for taking such an interest in helping to figure things out with User:Yosemitesam25. I know it's difficult to step into conflicts like this--I've been keeping an eye on it for a while and am still struggling to keep up--but I just wanted to let you know that your help is appreciated. --jonny-mt 12:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
ThanksAppreciate you taking action so quickly. Cheers Rossrs (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Re:HuggleOops, that was an obvious mistake. :( Thanks for telling me. jj137 (talk) 14:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC) cobainyou are failing at your duty as an administrator to see that i had made a good faith compromise attepmt with chrisb but chrisb just responded with sarcasm and i see you have taken sides and i will contact another adminstrator to handle this issue being i see you have your biases as i can see you are showing me the 3 revert rule warning mean while the one chrisb started the revert first and i tried to make a good faith attempt on his page to resolve the issue thats a nono scarian--Wikiscribe (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC) scarian i did discuss it look at chrisb talk page you are totaly missing the point i made a good faith attepmt to resolve the issue before i made change to page again what is your problem how can you just ignore this and say im not engaing in a dialoge to resolve the issue how blantlly bias can you be this is outrageous--Wikiscribe (talk) 17:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC) a small accurate contribution does not need to be disscussed on the talk page discussing that would equate to disscusing a gramtical error and asking it was okay to fix the spelling lol i handled it fine i proceded to ther person who had a problem and tried to be democratic about maybe he did not like the wording i used and offed to change it to something we could both agree on--Wikiscribe (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC) I put it on hold (not many things, shouldn't take too long). You can see my comments here. --Kakofonous (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
blockYou put a 24 hour block on me for violating the three revert rule on the article Standardization of Office Open XML ? But I had only exactly three reverts on that article and no more than that. Whilst others are using Tor to editthe article even Example. So why was I getting blocked ? hAl (talk) 21:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
CongratsDespite what you've asked me, I'd find it rude not to congratulate you on your successful RfA. --Alisyntalk 00:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Question about a proposed music mergeA discussion was started on merging something in September 2006. It never got much discussion. Now what? Enigma msg! 00:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
How can I avoid an banning and an edit war?I was recently blocked by you for an edit war with hal. I do not want another ban and would prefer to stay out of edit wars. But Hal who has a very pro Microsoft stance has just wiped out a large section of criticism on Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML Here is a dif and here is another with no discussion or asking for more references. Will I get blocked or warned for replacing them? Kilz (talk) 00:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
award![]() Protect
HAlIt seems that I am not the only user who has difficulties with the attitude of user HAl. I suggest blocking him. Oub (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC): Can you..Do something about Mr Linkspammer? 156.34.222.210 (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC) I put the article up for AfD. I figured if I mentioned it on your talk page that yourself and others might take a look at the article and see my reasoning and cast their votes one way or the other. Thanks. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
MessengerI sent you a couple of offline MSN messages. I will copy them into an email. I am out for the day. Good luck protecting the Wik. 156.34.223.41 (talk) 11:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
WhoopsI accidentally thought the one on the left was on the right. my apologizes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumestest (talk • contribs) 23:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Copyvio?The article Good to Be Bad is lifted almost word for word from here. Or am I seeing things? 156.34.239.151 (talk) 00:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Alcoholics AnonymousYour revert of vandalism: (Reverted edits by 207.232.97.13 (talk) to last version by 82.35.59.169) Has been vandalised again by user: 207.232.97.13
Your revert of vandalism: (Reverted edits by 207.232.97.13 (talk) to last version by Scarian) Has been vandalised once more by user: 207.232.97.13 Mr Miles 01:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Scarian, thanks for the block on user: 207.232.97.13 Unfortunately he also posters under the IP: 207.194.108.93 and User:MisterAlbert This is noted here: He has resumed his vandalism under the other two guises. Anything you can do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.59.169 (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC) RhapsodyPlease stop vandalizing the Rhapsody article and leaving bogus warnings on my talk page. The fact that the Japanese title is "Puppet Princess" and not "Doll Princess" is an undisputed fact. It's even stated several times in the article and is visible on the Japanese game cover, which is also shown on the article. In fact, the official title is even included in the Rhapsody game booklet, at the end of the prologue. Don't attack edits without even doing proper research.24.3.180.166 (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Return of the blogsI see that you are working at a slower pace. But I am hoping you can help again. There is a discussion on Talk:Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML of adding one of the blogs you removed with a different page from the blog, lol sbdd. At least my sense of humor is returning. Its so heated that I went to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard and posted a question in hopes of getting an answer , only to have the war dragged there. I didnt announce that I was asking the question, but was followed through my contribs. Would it be possible for you to post on the placing of blogs on Talk:Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML? Thanks in advance. Kilz (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC) USER WarrenHello You recall the article about OOXML? We are just trying to discuss in a peaceful manner how to preceed and user User:Warren just removed that section. I find that not acceptable he has not contributed to the discussion. I will revert his edit and propose a warning about his editing polity. Oub (talk) 17:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC): I was just curious as to why the user was blocked. I've talked with METALFREAK04 a few times in the past and he never seemed to be the kind of person to do anything wrong on wikipedia. I'm not saying he didn't I was just wondering what the block was for as I noticed it while moseying on over to his talk page. Thanks. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 20:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
That's cool. Nah, I'm not a pure blood american, lol. I'm guessing you're referring to a Native American? Maybe, I'll put a pic up, we'll see. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm?Is Badfish notable or advertising... or just notable advertising? 156.34.239.151 (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Scarian, check out my discovery of blatant plagiarism of the Hendrix & Greenwich village wiki articles by Rotimi Ogunjobi in his internet bookwith the (copied from the album title) "The Essential Jimi Hendrix" go to the hendix discussion page see article 71. Early Life Section,follow the links and compare, note the publishing date on his self published (by Lulu) "book" and check the pre 2006 articles on the hendrix wiki also the greenwich village.Jameselmo (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC) When you feel like itFriend14 (talk · contribs) is a vandal only account that needs a booting. 156.34.239.151 (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Warning?No less than 4 people on the talk page were agreeing on the edit. On the talk Page user:Warren, User:Cloud2user:Soumyasch and me stated that the section was inapporpriate, then Warren made the edit to remove it and user:Oub reverted it for like the tenth time. And then you give me a warning ???????????? That is fucking unbelievable. This time I am making a complaint against you for complety biased behaviour. user:Oub has double the amount of reverts on that particular section and you do not even touch him. Also you have been removing all references to Microsoft blogs from theStandardization of Office Open XML even though they were from experts on this standardization proces have have more peer review than any other sources and which are also some of the most cited sources on Office Open XML subject but left in all kind of unconfirmed and or negative stories by anti OOXML blogs. hAl (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC) ThanksPat: Thank you for recent contribution of disinterested commentary to my ongoing concerns about edits to tort law. I appreciate the advice of experienced and wise wikis such as you in resolving my first wikidispute, and I know that wikipedia is better having people like you around. Non Curat Lex (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Well-deserved barnstar
Hi, you A7'ed this. However, the page cited a source indicating the group was an enormously successful cover group. It was thus ineligible for speedy. May I please have the page restored? Chubbles (talk) 21:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism by this UserThis user has protected a user's talk page, apparently for protesting an unjustifiable block. This cannot be considered anything except pure vandalism, and vandalism of the worst and more petty sort. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.155.58 (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Need your opinion/expertise re: a bizarre text formattingWhen you have a spare minute go to Canned Heat. If you look at the article it doesn't seem to out of the ordinary poorly written but aren't they all Now click the edit button and slowly scroll down. Check out the bizarre line breaks that are not constant... but consistent throughout most of the article. In days past I have nailed many many articles with oddball formatting like that one as copyvio copy/paste jobs from other websites. Trouble with that one... and maybe I am just getting slow... I can't spot the "potential" external source. It looks like a pasty... but it can't be jarred and shelved until the true source... if there really is one... is Sherlocked out. Can you see what I am talking about when you click the edit button? That is my "strange-O" of the day. Another mystery for the Scooby-Doo gang to solve. Darn those meddlin' kids!156.34.228.106 (talk) 00:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
LMAO!!!! I saw 156 IP man's conservapedia pic...so true, so true. I also couldn't help but notice that Etac keeps sending 156 IP man "friendly, spread the love" templates. I thought 156 IP man hated Etac. or at least disliked him and considered him a troll. At any rate sorry to leave this message here, Pat, but I never know if I should leave a message on 156 IP man's page because he may switch IPs and never see it. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Warning Thanks for giving out the warning to ..colfer2, can you please look over this, [4] Uconnstud (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC) I just noticed that the AfD template is still up on the page and wasn't sure if I should remove it or not as I thought the conversation there was over. I figured I would bring it to your attention and leave it up to you to get rid of the template or whatever it is one is supposed to do there, lol. Thanks. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
hey!He asked me out on a date. Which had nothing to do with the 3rr report [5] to which I declined and stated that he had every right to his preference [6] and then further explained it to you [7] . WEre you able to look at the blatent violation of the 3rr report? thanks you. ps I have no bias against anyone except for the irrational Uconnstud (talk) 21:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
AN/II kept an eye on the message you posted, but no one replied. I looked into it a little bit myself, but it's a little hard to sort out, and I don't want to warn just the most obvious case, because I would likely get accused of bias in that case. "Why are you warning me! The other guy was just as bad!" etc. Heh. Anyway, I'm going to be away for a day or so. Good talking to ya! Enigma msg! 22:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC) ReplyI am adding these friendly salutations because I want to make friends with Wikipedians. Ok, I will try the welcoming commitee that you suggessted to me. Ok, thanks! LANGOLASSI (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC) More "Canned Heat-ish" copyvio?Pandemonium (band) is a very long article about a very non-notable subject. The style of prose indicates that it was written somewhere else and pasted here. BUT... I can't find the source. Ideas. One great idea I have is to speedy the thing... but I successfully speedied several articles over the past few days... and I feel a slump coming on if I try and keep up my current quality pace. :D 156.34.219.217 (talk) 12:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
RedSpruceI am sorry if looks like I am just reversing RedSpruce without thought. Just look how much information was deleted by RedSpruce in his last reversion of my edits back to his last version here at Annie Lee Moss. He reverted over a dozen individual edits, including information on her birth, her parents, her husband, and her death date. He even reverted back to his typographical error in the name of the author. Again here at Mary Stalcup Markward, he has deleted every edit I have made to the article. Its not a matter of editorial opinion, its wholesale deletion of whatever I add. There are two open ANIs on him over it. His radical changes are still locked into the two above articles. His strategy is to delete all my additions, then ask for the page to be protected to lock in his changes. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC) He also left this on my page, after deleting my additions to the article: "You are a complete idiot and moron. Please take your stupidity to some other article. Thank you. RedSpruce (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)" AfD spike bandHey, Pat, I just wanted to ask if you could put that article up for deletion when you can per WP:OR and no references. The article is totally ridiculous as well and untrue in many ways. It might fit the criteria for a speedy deletion. It's much appreciated, thanks. I probabaly won't be around for the next week, so good luck with the article and what not. I hope the articles i usually watch don't get messed up, but I guess I can't really do anything. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Cheers...for the user talkpage revert. And might I say wow you are fast. You reverted the vandal and blocked them before I managed to see what they wrote. Thanks again :) AngelOfSadness talk 23:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Scarian, I sent you an e-mail. --Alisyntalk 23:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
I Award You The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Remember to Smile !![]() Prom3th3an (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! --Prom3th3an (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC) When you're around...When you're around, 68.102.178.172 is back off his block and at it again. 156.34.236.222 (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
68 ignored your friendly message. 156.34.236.222 (talk) 02:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I know you think he was being a bit harshBut.. this isn't the first case against him [8] Uconnstud (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC) I am backHey, long time no see! I was a bit busy in my personal life, specifically in study. But, now I'm getting back to Wikipedia. I think our attempt to organize debate related articles under WP:WikiProject_Debating becomes very slow. So, I just wanna speed up this process. It won't be a problem if we two again start working together. Just let me know. Cheers! -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 10:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC) I'm not sure; given his reaction to a 31 hour for repeated vandalism to Scientology, I doubt that he'll take any block in the spirit in which it is intended. I wonder if the account is compromised since he suddenly seems to have switched from constructive editing to vandalism. It's clearly a schoolkid. However, I can keep an eye on him if you want to drop the block down. Maybe the knowledge that we can block him indefinitely will concentrate his mind? --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC) VenomHow is using the logo for venom a fair use violation? Undeath (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
When you have a chance..This can be rv'd in my standard cleanup re: lead-in wording. 156.34.217.80 (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Big issueNow I seem to have a problem with the way things were handled with the venom article. Many, many band articles have the logo in the userbox. Frankenstein Drag Queens From Planet 13 and MATH (band) are just a few examples. I think, that in some cases, the logo should be in the infobox because hardly no other pictures exist. One that surprised me as having no picture is Disturbed (band). Undeath (talk) 23:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
BaseballSee 125.254.116.99 (talk · contribs). They've had three strikes already. And they have no balls. I'd say they get tossed from the game. 156.34.217.80 (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Then a well deserved rest it is. I shall not interrupt such a noble excursion as a trip to 'non-Wiki-land' (I hope anyways :D ) Enjoy the time away and enjoy your birthday break!!! 156.34.142.110 (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Vote WantedGo here and voice your opinion. Thanks. Undeath (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
VotingI was not vote stacking. If I was, I would have invited people all from a wikigroup. But, if you look at the people I notified, I notified people in the previous discussion as well as admins that have never seen it before. I was gathering new people for a new look on how things should be set up. And, if Wikipedia does not decide things by voting, how does it decide things? Where should I take this issue/proposition? Undeath (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |