Jump to content

Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted to revision 206742925 by FellGleaming; rv NPOV does not mean no critique - it means a weighted critique according to reliable sources.. using TW
Mofb (talk | contribs)
This edit is by the subject of this biographical entry. Detailed reasons for the changes are in a letter from the subject's lawyers to Wikipedia's legal department.
Line 12: Line 12:
| mother = Marianna Laetitia Bower
| mother = Marianna Laetitia Bower
| date of birth = {{Birth date and age|1952|2|14|df=y}}
| date of birth = {{Birth date and age|1952|2|14|df=y}}
| place of birth =
| place of birth = London, England
| date of death =
| date of death =
| place of death =
| place of death =
Line 19: Line 19:
|}}
|}}


'''Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley''' (born [[14 February]] [[1952]]) is a retired [[United Kingdom|British]] international business consultant, policy advisor, writer, and inventor. He served as an advisor to [[Margaret Thatcher]] and has attracted controversy for his public opposition to the mainstream scientific consensus on [[global warming]] and [[climate change]].
'''Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley''' (born [[14 February]] [[1952]]) is a retired [[United Kingdom|British]] international business consultant, policy advisor, writer, and inventor. He served as an advisor to [[Margaret Thatcher]] and has questioned the theory that anthropogenic [[global warming]] and [[climate change]] may cause catastrophe. For a more accurate biographical entry, see Who's Who.


==Biography==
==Biography==
Monckton was born on [[14 February]] [[1952]], the eldest son of the [[Gilbert Monckton, 2nd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley|2nd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley]]. He was educated at [[Harrow School]], [[Churchill College, Cambridge]] where he read [[classics]] and [[Cardiff University|University College, Cardiff]], where he obtained a diploma in journalism.<ref name="whoswho">''Who's Who 2007'', p. 1599</ref> On [[19 May]] [[1990]], he married Juliet Mary Anne Malherbe Jensen. He inherited his father's [[hereditary peer]]age upon his father's death in 2006.
Lord Monckton was born on [[14 February]] [[1952]], the eldest son of the [[Gilbert Monckton, 2nd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley|2nd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley]]. He was educated at [[Harrow School]], [[Churchill College, Cambridge]] where he read [[classics]] and [[Cardiff University|University College, Cardiff]], where he obtained a diploma in journalism.<ref name="whoswho">''Who's Who 2007'', p. 1599</ref> On [[19 May]] [[1990]], he married Juliet Mary Anne Malherbe Jensen. He inherited his father's [[hereditary peer]]age upon his father's death in 2006.


==Career==
==Career==
Line 30: Line 30:
===Politics===
===Politics===
He returned to Conservative Central Office in late 1982, this time as a policy advisor for [[Margaret Thatcher]].<ref>"Journalists to join Thatcher policy team", ''The Times'', 2 August 1982</ref> In 1986, he became assistant editor of the newly established, and now defunct, newspaper ''[[Today (UK newspaper)|Today]]''. He was a consulting editor for the ''[[Evening Standard]]'' from 1987 to 1992 and was its chief leader-writer from 1990 to 1992.<ref name="whoswho" />
He returned to Conservative Central Office in late 1982, this time as a policy advisor for [[Margaret Thatcher]].<ref>"Journalists to join Thatcher policy team", ''The Times'', 2 August 1982</ref> In 1986, he became assistant editor of the newly established, and now defunct, newspaper ''[[Today (UK newspaper)|Today]]''. He was a consulting editor for the ''[[Evening Standard]]'' from 1987 to 1992 and was its chief leader-writer from 1990 to 1992.<ref name="whoswho" />

Although he has in the past stated that he is "a member of the Upper House of the [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|United Kingdom legislature]],"<ref name="uphold">Monckton, Christopher. [http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20061212_monckton.pdf "Uphold Free Speech about Climate Change or Resign"]. December 11, 2006</ref> Monckton has never been a member of either the [[House of Lords]] or the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]]. The 1997 [[reform of the House of Lords]], culminating in [[The House of Lords Act 1999| the 1999 House of Lords Act]] ended the right of all but 92 hereditary peers to sit in Parliament, with the remaining 92 being elected by fellow peers within their party caucus. Monckton was an unsuccessful candidate for a Conservative seat in the House of Lords in a March 2007 [[by-election]] caused by the deaths of two peers. He had been highly critical of the way that the Lords has been reformed, describing the by-election procedure, with 43 candidates and 47 electors, as "a bizarre constitutional abortion." <ref>"Born to run: There are 47 voters, 43 candidates, and the race to be elected a hereditary Tory peer is on. Is this democracy at last in the House of Lords?". ''The Guardian'', February 24, 2007</ref>


===Business consultancy===
===Business consultancy===
In 1987, Monckton founded a consultancy company, Christopher Monckton Ltd., where he served as a director until he retired because of ill health in 2006. In 1999, he created and published the [[Eternity puzzle]], a geometric puzzle which involved tiling a [[dodecagon]] with 209 irregularly shaped [[polygon]]s called [[Polydrafter]]s. A [[Pound sterling|£]]1m prize was won after 18 months by two [[Cambridge]] mathematicians.<ref name="bbcwin">{{cite news | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/992393.stm | publisher=BBC | work=BBC News Online | title=£1m Eternity jackpot scooped | date=2000-10-26}}</ref> By that time, 500,000 puzzles had been sold. Monckton claimed that he had to sell his home, Crimonmogate, to pay the prize;<ref name="bbcwin" /> he later admitted he fabricated the story as a publicity stunt.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://plus.maths.org/latestnews/jan-apr07/eternity/index.html }}</ref> A second puzzle, [[Eternity II puzzle|Eternity II]], was launched on [[28 July]] [[2007]], with a prize of $2 million.
In 1987, Monckton founded a consultancy company, Christopher Monckton Ltd., where he served as a director until he retired because of ill health in 2006. In 1999, he created and published the [[Eternity puzzle]], a geometric puzzle which involved tiling a [[dodecagon]] with 209 irregularly shaped [[polygon]]s called [[Polydrafter]]s. A [[Pound sterling|£]]1m prize was won after 18 months by two [[Cambridge]] mathematicians.<ref name="bbcwin">{{cite news | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/992393.stm | publisher=BBC | work=BBC News Online | title=£1m Eternity jackpot scooped | date=2000-10-26}}</ref> By that time, 500,000 puzzles had been sold. Monckton sold his home, Crimonmogate, to pay the prize;<ref name="bbcwin" /> A second puzzle, [[Eternity II puzzle|Eternity II]], was launched on [[28 July]] [[2007]], with a prize of $2 million.


==Associations==
==Associations==
Line 41: Line 39:
==Political views==
==Political views==
===Social policy===
===Social policy===
Monckton has been described as "a fervent, forthright and opinionated Roman Catholic Tory" <ref>MacArthur, Brian. ''Eddy Shah: Today and the Newspaper Revolution'', p. 154. David & Charles Publishers, 1988. ISBN 0715391453</ref> who has been closely associated with the "[[New Right#United Kingdom|New Right]]" faction of the Conservative Party.<ref name="berridge">Virginia Berridge. ''AIDS in the UK: The Making of a Policy, 1981-1994'', p. 132. Oxford University Press, 1996. ISBN 0198204736</ref> As one of Margaret Thatcher's policy advisors, he has been credited with being "the brains behind the Thatcherite policy of giving council tenants ([[public housing]]) the [[Right to buy scheme|right to buy their homes]]."<ref name="times031004">Leppard, David. "[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article489715.ece Top Tory in a kilt hit by visa 'racket' case]", ''The Times'', 3 October 2004</ref> In more recent years, he has been associated with the [[Referendum Party]], advising its founder Sir [[James Goldsmith]], and in 2003 he helped a Scottish Tory breakaway group, the [[People's Alliance]].<ref name="times031004" />
Monckton has been described as "a fervent, forthright and opinionated Roman Catholic Tory" <ref>MacArthur, Brian. ''Eddy Shah: Today and the Newspaper Revolution'', p. 154. David & Charles Publishers, 1988. ISBN 0715391453</ref>. As one of Margaret Thatcher's policy advisors, he has been credited with being "the brains behind the Thatcherite policy of giving council tenants ([[public housing]]) the [[Right to buy scheme|right to buy their homes]]."<ref name="times031004">Leppard, David. "[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article489715.ece Top Tory in a kilt hit by visa 'racket' case]", ''The Times'', 3 October 2004</ref> In more recent years, his consultancy company has advised many political parties, including the [[Referendum Party]], advising its founder Sir [[James Goldsmith]], and, in 2003, the Scottish [[People's Alliance]].<ref name="times031004" />


===AIDS===
===AIDS===
Monckton's views on how the [[AIDS]] epidemic should be tackled have been the subject of some controversy. In an article entitled "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS", written for the January 1987 issue of ''[[The American Spectator]]'', he argued that "there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently." This would involve isolating between 1.5 and 3 million people in the United States ("not altogether impossible") and another 30,000 people in the UK ("not insuperably difficult").<ref>Monckton, Christopher. "The Myth of Heterosexual Aids." ''The American Spectator'', January 1987</ref> Monckton appeared on the [[BBC]]'s ''[[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]]'' programme in February 1987 to discuss his views and present the results of an opinion poll that found public support for his position.<ref name="berridge" /> In 1999 the British gay rights group [[OutRage!]] launched a campaign to force the manufacturer of Monckton's [[Eternity Puzzle]] to disassociate itself from him because of his views.<ref>"[http://www.planetout.com/news/article.html?1999/08/05/4 OutRage Goads ERTL re Monckton]". ''The Advocate'', August 5, 1999</ref> Monckton has since modified his views on AIDS, stating that "the article was written at the very outset of the AIDS epidemic, and with 33 million people around the world now infected, the possibility of [quarantine] is laughable. It couldn't work." <ref>"ERTL in puzzle as gay group protests - inventor outrageous, Glen Ellyn firm told", ''Chicago Tribune'', 14 August 1999</ref>
In an article entitled "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS", written for the January 1987 issue of ''[[The American Spectator]]'', written after he had consulted the first medical scientists to investigate disease, he argued that "there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently", adding that the isolation should be humanely done, and need not be as drastic as the isolation that had been used as the standard method of preventing the spread of previous fatal infections. <ref>Monckton, Christopher. "The Myth of Heterosexual Aids." ''The American Spectator'', January 1987</ref> Monckton appeared on the [[BBC]]'s ''[[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]]'' programme in February 1987 to discuss his views and present the results of an opinion poll that found public support for his position.<ref name="berridge" /> In 1999 the British gay rights group [[OutRage!]] launched an unsuccessful campaign to force the manufacturer of Monckton's [[Eternity Puzzle]] to disassociate itself from him because of his desire to spare the 25 million who have since died and the 40 million who are now infected (UNAIDS statistics) because the standard public health measures were not applied.<ref>"[http://www.planetout.com/news/article.html?1999/08/05/4 OutRage Goads ERTL re Monckton]". ''The Advocate'', August 5, 1999</ref> Monckton more recently said that, though isolation had been possible and would have been right in the 1980s, "the article was written at the very outset of the AIDS epidemic, and with 40 million people around the world now infected, the possibility of [quarantine] is laughable. It couldn't work." AIDS, he has said, was an almost entirely avoidable and heartbreaking tragedy that occurred because the short-term vested interest of a narrow special interest group prevailed over the general interest. <ref>"ERTL in puzzle as gay group protests - inventor outrageous, Glen Ellyn firm told", ''Chicago Tribune'', 14 August 1999</ref>


===European integration===
===European integration===
Monckton has been an advocate of [[Euroscepticism]] for many years; as he put it in a 2007 interview, he would "leave the [[European Union]], close down 90 per cent of government services and shift power away from the atheistic, humanistic government and into the hands of families and individuals." <ref>"'I'm bad at doing what I'm told. I'm a born free-thinker ' - The 5-Minute Interview", ''The Independent'', 24 August 2007</ref> In 1994, he sued the Conservative government of [[John Major]] for agreeing to contribute to the costs of the Protocol on Social Policy agreed in the 1993 [[Maastrict Treaty]], although the UK had an opt-out from the protocol. The case was heard in the Scottish [[Court of Session]] in May 1994. His petition for [[judicial review]] was dismissed by the court for want of relevancy.<ref>"Lawful for UK to contribute to European social policy costs - Scots Law report", ''The Times'', 12 May 1994</ref>
Lord Monckton is in favour of Europe and, therefore, against the European Union on the ground that, if it were to apply for membership of itself, its application would be rejected on the ground that it is insufficiently democratic. In a 2007 interview, he said he would "leave the [[European Union]], close down 90 per cent of government services and shift power away from atheistic-humanist, bureaucratic-centralist governments and back into the hands of families and individuals." <ref>"'I'm bad at doing what I'm told. I'm a born free-thinker ' - The 5-Minute Interview", ''The Independent'', 24 August 2007</ref> In 1994, he sued the Conservative government of [[John Major]] for agreeing to contribute to the costs of the Protocol on Social Policy agreed in the 1993 [[Maastrict Treaty]], although the UK had an opt-out from the protocol. The case was heard in the Scottish [[Court of Session]] in May 1994. His petition for [[judicial review]] was dismissed by the court, which, however, expressed considerable sympathy for the petitioner's position and would have found in his favour if the Government had not discovered, at the last moment, a line item in the EU Budget authorizing expenditure on the Social Chapter under the Maastricht Treaty that the UK Parliament had previously expressly declined to authorize. The Government took Lord Monckton's challenge so seriously that it put up the Lord Advocate personally against him. The outcome was such that the Government was unable to recover its costs in the cause.<ref>"Lawful for UK to contribute to European social policy costs - Scots Law report", ''The Times'', 12 May 1994</ref>


===Global warming===
===Global warming===
Monckton is critical of the theory of anthropogenic causes for [[global warming]] and the stated scope of it, which he regards as a controversy catalyzed by "the need of the international left for a new flag to rally round" following the fall of the [[Berlin Wall]] in 1989.<ref name="brown">Brown, Allan. "From here to Eternity II". ''The Sunday Times'', July 22, 2007</ref> Although he has acknowledged that [[global warming]] is real, he has cast doubt on its provenance and the underlying science in a number of newspaper articles and papers. His views have attracted controversy and strong criticism from scientists and environmental activists, including [[Al Gore]] and [[George Monbiot]]. According to Monckton, his interest in the subject was provoked by "a finance house [asking] me to look into it to see if it was anything the financial sector should worry about. The more I looked the more I thought, hang on, none of this quite adds up." <ref name="brown" />
Monckton is critical of the theory that anthropogenic [[global warming]] may prove catastrophic. Although he has acknowledged that [[global warming]] has occurred, he has cast doubt on its provenance and the underlying science in a number of newspaper articles and papers. His researches have attracted strong opinions for and against. According to Monckton, his interest in the subject was provoked by "a finance house [asking] me to look into it to see if it was anything the financial sector should worry about. The more I looked the more I thought, hang on, none of this quite adds up." <ref name="brown" />

In two high-profile ''[[Sunday Telegraph]]'' articles published in November 2006, Monckton has disputed whether global warming is man-made, suggested that it is unlikely to prove catastrophic and criticized the science performed by the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]. In particular, he has criticized the IPCC's interpretation of the [[Medieval Warm Period]], cited the [[hockey stick controversy|"hockey stick" controversy]] as evidence of faulty science, argued that the IPCC's scientists have misapplied the [[Stefan–Boltzmann law]], and supported the [[Solar variation#Solar variation theory|solar variation theory]] as a possible explanation of global warming.<ref name=MoncktonNov2006>Monckton, Christopher. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/05/nosplit/nwarm05.xml "Climate chaos? Don't believe it"], ''The Sunday Telegraph'', November 5, 2006.</ref> In response to the U.K. government's [[Stern Review|Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change]], he has argued that the review's recommendation to invest 1% of global GDP in climate change mitigation would be ineffective, as would the introduction of [[carbon tax]]es and [[emissions trading]] as a means of curbing carbon emissions. He has proposed instead that the best solution should be to "go nuclear and reverse 20th-century deforestation." <ref>Monckton, Christopher. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/12/nclim12.xml Wrong problem, wrong solution], ''The Sunday Telegraph'', November 15, 2006.</ref>


In two ''[[Sunday Telegraph]]'' articles published in November 2006, Monckton disputed the extent to which global warming is man-made, suggested that it is unlikely to prove catastrophic, and criticized the science performed by the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]. In particular, he criticized the IPCC's attempted abolition of the [[Medieval Warm Period]], cited the [[hockey stick controversy|"hockey stick" controversy]] as evidence of faulty science, argued that the IPCC's scientists had misapplied and failed to mention the [[Stefan–Boltzmann law]], and discussed the [[Solar variation#Solar variation theory|solar variation theory]] as a possible explanation of global warming.<ref name=MoncktonNov2006>Monckton, Christopher. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/05/nosplit/nwarm05.xml "Climate chaos? Don't believe it"], ''The Sunday Telegraph'', November 5, 2006.</ref> In response to the U.K. government's [[Stern Review|Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change]], he has argued that the review's recommendation to invest 1% of global GDP in climate change mitigation would be ineffective, as would the introduction of [[carbon tax]]es and [[emissions trading]] as a means of curbing carbon emissions. He has proposed instead that the best solution should be to "go nuclear and reverse 20th-century deforestation." <ref>Monckton, Christopher. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/12/nclim12.xml Wrong problem, wrong solution], ''The Sunday Telegraph'', November 15, 2006.</ref>
[[Gavin Schmidt]] has criticised Monckton's analysis of [[climate sensitivity]] as "sleight-of-hand to fool the unwary" [http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/11/cuckoo-science/]. Dr. Stephan Harrison criticises Moncktons' articles as "full of errors, misuse of data and cherry-picked examples" [http://www.turnuptheheat.org/?page_id=27]. The British writer and environmentalist [[George Monbiot]] has criticized Monckton's arguments as "cherry-picking, downright misrepresentation and pseudo-scientific gibberish."<ref>Monbiot, George. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,1947246,00.html "This is a dazzling debunking of climate change science. It is also wildly wrong"], ''The Guardian'', November 14, 2006</ref> In a response published in ''[[The Guardian]]'', Monckton has argued that he "got the science right" and that Monbiot got "too many facts wrong" and had shown "ignorance of the elementary physics".<ref>Monckton, Christopher. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1947724,00.html "This wasn't gibberish. I got my facts right on global warming"], ''The Guardian'', November 16, 2006</ref> According to Monbiot, Monckton has since threatened him and ''The Guardian'' "with libel proceedings after I challenged his claims about climate science." <ref>Monbiot, George. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2053234,00.html "There is climate change censorship - and it's the deniers who dish it out"], ''The Guardian'', April 10, 2007</ref> Monckton's views have also been criticized by Al Gore. In an article in ''[[The Sunday Telegraph]]'', the former U.S. Vice President and environmental campaigner described Monckton's scientific assertions as "extremely misleading" and "completely wrong".<ref>Gore, Al. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/19/nclim19.xml "At stake is nothing less than the survival of human civilisation"], ''The Sunday Telegraph'', 19 November 2006</ref> Monckton has in turn accused Gore of having "bastardised" science<ref name="brown" /> and having produced "a foofaraw of pseudo-science" in the form of his climate change documentary ''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]''.<ref>Manthorpe, Rowland. "Monckton's Jigsaw". ''The Observer'', May 6, 2007</ref>


In an article in ''[[The Sunday Telegraph]]'' replying to Lord Monckton, the former U.S. Vice President and environmental campaigner Al Gore described Monckton's scientific assertions as "extremely misleading" and "completely wrong".<ref>Gore, Al. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/19/nclim19.xml "At stake is nothing less than the survival of human civilisation"], ''The Sunday Telegraph'', 19 November 2006</ref> Monckton has in turn accused Gore of having "bastardised" science<ref name="brown" /> and having produced "a foofaraw of pseudo-science" in the form of his climate change documentary ''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]''.<ref>Manthorpe, Rowland. "Monckton's Jigsaw". ''The Observer'', May 6, 2007</ref>
Monckton's critics charge that "[his] science is self-taught and his paper qualifications nonexistent"<ref name="brown" /> and that "he is trying to take on the global scientific establishment on the strength of a classics degree from Cambridge."<ref name="leake">{{cite news | author=Leake, Jonathan | url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/education/article2652851.ece | title=Please, sir - Gore's got warming wrong | publisher=The Times | date=2007-10-14}}</ref> For his part, Monckton takes the view that it is "a very modern notion that you need paper qualifications to pronounce on anything and it comes from the socialist idea that people need to be trained in the official, accepted, dogmatic truths."<ref name="brown" />


After the U.S. Senators [[Jay Rockefeller]] and [[Olympia Snowe]] wrote a bipartisan letter to the Chief Executive Officer of [[ExxonMobil]] asking him to stop funding think tanks that reject [[global warming]],<ref>{{cite web | url=http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9ACBA744-802A-23AD-47BE-2683985C724E | title=Rockefeller and Snowe demand that Exxon Mobil end funding of campaign that denies global climate change" | work=website of Olympia J. Snowe}}</ref> Monckton wrote to them, asserting that their letter to ExxonMobil violated the corporation's right of free speech and calling on them to reverse their position or resign.<ref name="uphold" /> In February 2007, he published a critique of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on climate change.<ref>{{cite web | author=Monckton, Christopher | url=http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20070201_monckton.pdf | title=IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007 Analysis and Summary | date=February 2007}}</ref> His calculations of climate sensitivity to increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have been published in the ''Quarterly Economic Bulletin''.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20070217_monckton.pdf | title=Quarterly Economic Bulletin | date=December 2006}}</ref> A number of his writings on global warming, including his letter to Senators Snowe and Rockefeller and his IPCC critique, have been published by the [[Science and Public Policy Institute]] (SPPI), part of [[Frontiers of Freedom]], a conservative organization funded by ExxonMobil that has campaigned against the screening of ''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]'' in U.S. schools.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/UK_Noble_to_senators_Apologize_to_1218.html | title=UK noble to senators: Apologize to Exxon or resign | publisher=The Raw Story | date=2006-12-18}}</ref>
After the U.S. Senators [[Jay Rockefeller]] and [[Olympia Snowe]] wrote a bipartisan letter to the Chief Executive Officer of [[ExxonMobil]] asking him to stop funding think tanks that reject [[global warming]],<ref>{{cite web | url=http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9ACBA744-802A-23AD-47BE-2683985C724E | title=Rockefeller and Snowe demand that Exxon Mobil end funding of campaign that denies global climate change" | work=website of Olympia J. Snowe}}</ref> Monckton wrote to them, asserting that their letter to ExxonMobil violated the corporation's right of free speech and calling on them to reverse their position or resign.<ref name="uphold" /> In February 2007, he published a critique of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on climate change.<ref>{{cite web | author=Monckton, Christopher | url=http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20070201_monckton.pdf | title=IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007 Analysis and Summary | date=February 2007}}</ref> His calculations of climate sensitivity to increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have been published in the ''Quarterly Economic Bulletin''.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20070217_monckton.pdf | title=Quarterly Economic Bulletin | date=December 2006}}</ref> A number of his writings on global warming, including his letter to Senators Snowe and Rockefeller and his IPCC critique, have been published by the [[Science and Public Policy Institute]] (SPPI). <ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/UK_Noble_to_senators_Apologize_to_1218.html | title=UK noble to senators: Apologize to Exxon or resign | publisher=The Raw Story | date=2006-12-18}}</ref>


Monckton played a key role in a [[Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education and Skills|legal challenge]] heard in the [[High Court of Justice]] in October 2007 in a bid to prevent ''An Inconvenient Truth'' from being shown in English schools. In an interview with the conservative American talk radio host [[Glenn Beck]], Monckton stated that he had prompted an unnamed friend to fund the case "to fight back against this tide of unscientific freedom-destroying nonsense" and had played a direct role in the litigation against the British government.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/196/6783/ | title=Glenn talks with Lord Monckton | publisher=Glenn Beck | date=2008-03-04}}</ref> He is also funding the distribution to schools of the controversial documentary ''[[The Great Global Warming Swindle]]'' as a riposte to Gore's film.<ref name="leake" /> He is a supporter of [[The New Party (UK)|The New Party]], which lent its political support to the litigation over Gore's film, and wrote part of its manifesto.
Monckton was an expert witness in a [[Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education and Skills|legal challenge]] heard in the [[High Court of Justice]] in October 2007, to prevent ''An Inconvenient Truth'' from being shown in English schools. The judge held that "The Armageddon scenario that he [Al Gore] depicts is not based on any scientific view," and ordered that the UK Government must issue corrective guidance in writing to all schools, putting right nine "errors" of science in Gore's film. In an interview with the conservative American talk radio host [[Glenn Beck]], Monckton stated that he had recommmended that a friend should support the case financially "to fight back against this tide of unscientific freedom-destroying nonsense", and that he had acted as an expert witness in the case.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/196/6783/ | title=Glenn talks with Lord Monckton | publisher=Glenn Beck | date=2008-03-04}}</ref> He is also seeking funding for the distribution to schools of the controversial documentary ''[[The Great Global Warming Swindle]]'', and of his own feature-length documentary, Apocalypse? NO!, as a riposte to Gore's film.<ref name="leake" />


In March 2007, Monckton ran a series of advertisements in ''[[The New York Times]]'' and ''[[Washington Post]]'' challenging Al Gore to an internationally televised debate on climate change. The former U.S. Vice President did not respond. <ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/19/145933.shtml?s=ic "Al Gore Challenged to Climate Debate"]. NewsMax, [[March 19]], [[2007]]</ref><ref name="brown" /> The Science and Public Policy Institute provided funding for Monckton to produce a response to ''An Inconvenient Truth'', to be called ''Apocalypse?, No!'', described as "showing Monckton presenting a slide show in a vitriolic attack on climate change science."<ref name="leake" /> The film includes footage of Monckton giving a Gore-style presentation given on [[8 October]] [[2007]] at the [[Cambridge Union]] in which he asserted that Gore and the IPCC had systematically falsified and exaggerated the evidence for global warming. <ref name="leake" /><ref>Hardie, Josh. "[http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/global-warming-fact-or-theory/ Global warming: fact or theory?]", ''The Cambridge Student'', [[13 October]] [[2007]]</ref>
In March 2007, Monckton was featured in a series of advertisements in ''[[The New York Times]]'' and ''[[Washington Post]]'' challenging Al Gore to an internationally televised debate on climate change. The former U.S. Vice President did not respond. <ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/19/145933.shtml?s=ic "Al Gore Challenged to Climate Debate"]. NewsMax, [[March 19]], [[2007]]</ref><ref name="brown" /> The Science and Public Policy Institute provided funding for Monckton to produce a response to ''An Inconvenient Truth'', called ''Apocalypse?, No!'', and available from www.demanddebate.com, described by a detractor as "showing Monckton presenting a slide show in a vitriolic attack on climate change science."<ref name="leake" />, and by a supporter, Professor Larry Gould of the University of Hartford, Connecticut, as "the best presentation of the many I have seen on either side of the climate debate - powerful, informative, and emotionally compelling". The film includes footage of Lord Monckton giving a Gore-style presentation given on [[8 October]] [[2007]] at the [[Cambridge Union]] in which he asserted that Gore and the IPCC had systematically falsified and exaggerated the evidence for global warming. <ref name="leake" /><ref>Hardie, Josh. "[http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/global-warming-fact-or-theory/ Global warming: fact or theory?]", ''The Cambridge Student'', [[13 October]] [[2007]]</ref>


==Published works==
==Published works==
Line 76: Line 72:
* ''Sudoku Xtreme''. Headline Publishing Group, 2006. ISBN 0755315308
* ''Sudoku Xtreme''. Headline Publishing Group, 2006. ISBN 0755315308


The Science and Public Policy Institute has published nine papers by Monckton on climate-change science.<ref>[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton_papers/ Science and Public Policy Institute - Monckton Papers<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
The Science and Public Policy Institute has published numerous papers by Lord Monckton on scientific and economic aspects of climate change.<ref>[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton_papers/ Science and Public Policy Institute - Monckton Papers<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 90: Line 86:
*[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton_papers/greenhouse_warming_what_greenhouse_warming_.html Greenhouse warming? What greenhouse warming?] by Christopher Monckton
*[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton_papers/greenhouse_warming_what_greenhouse_warming_.html Greenhouse warming? What greenhouse warming?] by Christopher Monckton
*[http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20061121_gore.pdf Gore Gored] Monckton's response to Gore
*[http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20061121_gore.pdf Gore Gored] Monckton's response to Gore
*[http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,2073267,00.html Monckton saves the day!], ''The Observer'', May 6, 2007
*[http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/11/cuckoo-science/ Real Climate: Cuckoo Science] - analysis of Monckton's ''Telegraph'' articles, November 9, 2006


{{start box}}
{{start box}}

Revision as of 11:46, 25 April 2008

Christopher Walter Monckton
3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
SpouseJuliet Jensen
Names
Christopher Walter Monckton
FatherGilbert Monckton, 2nd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
MotherMarianna Laetitia Bower
OccupationRetired international business consultant

Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (born 14 February 1952) is a retired British international business consultant, policy advisor, writer, and inventor. He served as an advisor to Margaret Thatcher and has questioned the theory that anthropogenic global warming and climate change may cause catastrophe. For a more accurate biographical entry, see Who's Who.

Biography

Lord Monckton was born on 14 February 1952, the eldest son of the 2nd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley. He was educated at Harrow School, Churchill College, Cambridge where he read classics and University College, Cardiff, where he obtained a diploma in journalism.[1] On 19 May 1990, he married Juliet Mary Anne Malherbe Jensen. He inherited his father's hereditary peerage upon his father's death in 2006.

Career

Media

In 1974 at the age of 22, Monckton joined the Yorkshire Post, where he worked as a reporter and leader-writer. From 1977 to 1978, he worked at Conservative Central Office as a press officer, becoming the editor of the Roman Catholic newspaper The Universe in 1979, then managing editor of The Sunday Telegraph Magazine in 1981. He joined the English tabloid newspaper, Evening Standard, as a leader-writer in 1982.[1]

Politics

He returned to Conservative Central Office in late 1982, this time as a policy advisor for Margaret Thatcher.[2] In 1986, he became assistant editor of the newly established, and now defunct, newspaper Today. He was a consulting editor for the Evening Standard from 1987 to 1992 and was its chief leader-writer from 1990 to 1992.[1]

Business consultancy

In 1987, Monckton founded a consultancy company, Christopher Monckton Ltd., where he served as a director until he retired because of ill health in 2006. In 1999, he created and published the Eternity puzzle, a geometric puzzle which involved tiling a dodecagon with 209 irregularly shaped polygons called Polydrafters. A £1m prize was won after 18 months by two Cambridge mathematicians.[3] By that time, 500,000 puzzles had been sold. Monckton sold his home, Crimonmogate, to pay the prize;[3] A second puzzle, Eternity II, was launched on 28 July 2007, with a prize of $2 million.

Associations

Monckton is a member of the Worshipful Company of Broderers, an Officer of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, a Knight of Honour and Devotion of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, and a member of the Roman Catholic Mass Media Commission. He is also a qualified Day Skipper with the Royal Yacht Association, and has been a Trustee of the Hales Trophy for the Blue Riband of the Atlantic since 1986.[1]

Political views

Social policy

Monckton has been described as "a fervent, forthright and opinionated Roman Catholic Tory" [4]. As one of Margaret Thatcher's policy advisors, he has been credited with being "the brains behind the Thatcherite policy of giving council tenants (public housing) the right to buy their homes."[5] In more recent years, his consultancy company has advised many political parties, including the Referendum Party, advising its founder Sir James Goldsmith, and, in 2003, the Scottish People's Alliance.[5]

AIDS

In an article entitled "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS", written for the January 1987 issue of The American Spectator, written after he had consulted the first medical scientists to investigate disease, he argued that "there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently", adding that the isolation should be humanely done, and need not be as drastic as the isolation that had been used as the standard method of preventing the spread of previous fatal infections. [6] Monckton appeared on the BBC's Panorama programme in February 1987 to discuss his views and present the results of an opinion poll that found public support for his position.[7] In 1999 the British gay rights group OutRage! launched an unsuccessful campaign to force the manufacturer of Monckton's Eternity Puzzle to disassociate itself from him because of his desire to spare the 25 million who have since died and the 40 million who are now infected (UNAIDS statistics) because the standard public health measures were not applied.[8] Monckton more recently said that, though isolation had been possible and would have been right in the 1980s, "the article was written at the very outset of the AIDS epidemic, and with 40 million people around the world now infected, the possibility of [quarantine] is laughable. It couldn't work." AIDS, he has said, was an almost entirely avoidable and heartbreaking tragedy that occurred because the short-term vested interest of a narrow special interest group prevailed over the general interest. [9]

European integration

Lord Monckton is in favour of Europe and, therefore, against the European Union on the ground that, if it were to apply for membership of itself, its application would be rejected on the ground that it is insufficiently democratic. In a 2007 interview, he said he would "leave the European Union, close down 90 per cent of government services and shift power away from atheistic-humanist, bureaucratic-centralist governments and back into the hands of families and individuals." [10] In 1994, he sued the Conservative government of John Major for agreeing to contribute to the costs of the Protocol on Social Policy agreed in the 1993 Maastrict Treaty, although the UK had an opt-out from the protocol. The case was heard in the Scottish Court of Session in May 1994. His petition for judicial review was dismissed by the court, which, however, expressed considerable sympathy for the petitioner's position and would have found in his favour if the Government had not discovered, at the last moment, a line item in the EU Budget authorizing expenditure on the Social Chapter under the Maastricht Treaty that the UK Parliament had previously expressly declined to authorize. The Government took Lord Monckton's challenge so seriously that it put up the Lord Advocate personally against him. The outcome was such that the Government was unable to recover its costs in the cause.[11]

Global warming

Monckton is critical of the theory that anthropogenic global warming may prove catastrophic. Although he has acknowledged that global warming has occurred, he has cast doubt on its provenance and the underlying science in a number of newspaper articles and papers. His researches have attracted strong opinions for and against. According to Monckton, his interest in the subject was provoked by "a finance house [asking] me to look into it to see if it was anything the financial sector should worry about. The more I looked the more I thought, hang on, none of this quite adds up." [12]

In two Sunday Telegraph articles published in November 2006, Monckton disputed the extent to which global warming is man-made, suggested that it is unlikely to prove catastrophic, and criticized the science performed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In particular, he criticized the IPCC's attempted abolition of the Medieval Warm Period, cited the "hockey stick" controversy as evidence of faulty science, argued that the IPCC's scientists had misapplied and failed to mention the Stefan–Boltzmann law, and discussed the solar variation theory as a possible explanation of global warming.[13] In response to the U.K. government's Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, he has argued that the review's recommendation to invest 1% of global GDP in climate change mitigation would be ineffective, as would the introduction of carbon taxes and emissions trading as a means of curbing carbon emissions. He has proposed instead that the best solution should be to "go nuclear and reverse 20th-century deforestation." [14]

In an article in The Sunday Telegraph replying to Lord Monckton, the former U.S. Vice President and environmental campaigner Al Gore described Monckton's scientific assertions as "extremely misleading" and "completely wrong".[15] Monckton has in turn accused Gore of having "bastardised" science[12] and having produced "a foofaraw of pseudo-science" in the form of his climate change documentary An Inconvenient Truth.[16]

After the U.S. Senators Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe wrote a bipartisan letter to the Chief Executive Officer of ExxonMobil asking him to stop funding think tanks that reject global warming,[17] Monckton wrote to them, asserting that their letter to ExxonMobil violated the corporation's right of free speech and calling on them to reverse their position or resign.[18] In February 2007, he published a critique of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on climate change.[19] His calculations of climate sensitivity to increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have been published in the Quarterly Economic Bulletin.[20] A number of his writings on global warming, including his letter to Senators Snowe and Rockefeller and his IPCC critique, have been published by the Science and Public Policy Institute (SPPI). [21]

Monckton was an expert witness in a legal challenge heard in the High Court of Justice in October 2007, to prevent An Inconvenient Truth from being shown in English schools. The judge held that "The Armageddon scenario that he [Al Gore] depicts is not based on any scientific view," and ordered that the UK Government must issue corrective guidance in writing to all schools, putting right nine "errors" of science in Gore's film. In an interview with the conservative American talk radio host Glenn Beck, Monckton stated that he had recommmended that a friend should support the case financially "to fight back against this tide of unscientific freedom-destroying nonsense", and that he had acted as an expert witness in the case.[22] He is also seeking funding for the distribution to schools of the controversial documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle, and of his own feature-length documentary, Apocalypse? NO!, as a riposte to Gore's film.[23]

In March 2007, Monckton was featured in a series of advertisements in The New York Times and Washington Post challenging Al Gore to an internationally televised debate on climate change. The former U.S. Vice President did not respond. [24][12] The Science and Public Policy Institute provided funding for Monckton to produce a response to An Inconvenient Truth, called Apocalypse?, No!, and available from www.demanddebate.com, described by a detractor as "showing Monckton presenting a slide show in a vitriolic attack on climate change science."[23], and by a supporter, Professor Larry Gould of the University of Hartford, Connecticut, as "the best presentation of the many I have seen on either side of the climate debate - powerful, informative, and emotionally compelling". The film includes footage of Lord Monckton giving a Gore-style presentation given on 8 October 2007 at the Cambridge Union in which he asserted that Gore and the IPCC had systematically falsified and exaggerated the evidence for global warming. [23][25]

Published works

  • The Laker Story (with Ivan Fallon). Christensen, 1982. ISBN 0950800708
  • Anglican Orders: null and void?. Family History Books, 1986.
  • The AIDS Report. 1987
  • European Monetary Union: opportunities and dangers. University of St. Andrews, Department of Economics. 1997
  • Sudoku X. Headline Publishing Group, 2005. ISBN 0755315014
  • Sudoku X-mas. Headline Publishing Group, 2005. ISBN 0755315022
  • Sudoku Xpert. Headline Publishing Group, 2006. ISBN 0755315294
  • Junior Sudoku X. Headline Publishing Group, 2006. ISBN 0755315286
  • Sudoku Xtreme. Headline Publishing Group, 2006. ISBN 0755315308

The Science and Public Policy Institute has published numerous papers by Lord Monckton on scientific and economic aspects of climate change.[26]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d Who's Who 2007, p. 1599
  2. ^ "Journalists to join Thatcher policy team", The Times, 2 August 1982
  3. ^ a b "£1m Eternity jackpot scooped". BBC News Online. BBC. 2000-10-26.
  4. ^ MacArthur, Brian. Eddy Shah: Today and the Newspaper Revolution, p. 154. David & Charles Publishers, 1988. ISBN 0715391453
  5. ^ a b Leppard, David. "Top Tory in a kilt hit by visa 'racket' case", The Times, 3 October 2004
  6. ^ Monckton, Christopher. "The Myth of Heterosexual Aids." The American Spectator, January 1987
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference berridge was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ "OutRage Goads ERTL re Monckton". The Advocate, August 5, 1999
  9. ^ "ERTL in puzzle as gay group protests - inventor outrageous, Glen Ellyn firm told", Chicago Tribune, 14 August 1999
  10. ^ "'I'm bad at doing what I'm told. I'm a born free-thinker ' - The 5-Minute Interview", The Independent, 24 August 2007
  11. ^ "Lawful for UK to contribute to European social policy costs - Scots Law report", The Times, 12 May 1994
  12. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference brown was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Monckton, Christopher. "Climate chaos? Don't believe it", The Sunday Telegraph, November 5, 2006.
  14. ^ Monckton, Christopher. Wrong problem, wrong solution, The Sunday Telegraph, November 15, 2006.
  15. ^ Gore, Al. "At stake is nothing less than the survival of human civilisation", The Sunday Telegraph, 19 November 2006
  16. ^ Manthorpe, Rowland. "Monckton's Jigsaw". The Observer, May 6, 2007
  17. ^ "Rockefeller and Snowe demand that Exxon Mobil end funding of campaign that denies global climate change"". website of Olympia J. Snowe.
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference uphold was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Monckton, Christopher (February 2007). "IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007 Analysis and Summary" (PDF).
  20. ^ "Quarterly Economic Bulletin" (PDF). December 2006.
  21. ^ "UK noble to senators: Apologize to Exxon or resign". The Raw Story. 2006-12-18.
  22. ^ "Glenn talks with Lord Monckton". Glenn Beck. 2008-03-04.
  23. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference leake was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ "Al Gore Challenged to Climate Debate". NewsMax, March 19, 2007
  25. ^ Hardie, Josh. "Global warming: fact or theory?", The Cambridge Student, 13 October 2007
  26. ^ Science and Public Policy Institute - Monckton Papers
Peerage of the United Kingdom
Preceded by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
2006–present
Succeeded by
Incumbent

{{subst:#if:Monckton of Brenchley, Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount|}} [[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:1952}}

|| UNKNOWN | MISSING = Year of birth missing {{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:}}||LIVING=(living people)}}
| #default = 1952 births

}}]] {{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:}}

|| LIVING  = 
| MISSING  = 
| UNKNOWN  = 
| #default = 

}}

Template:Persondata