Jump to content

User talk:Nukeh: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nukeh (talk | contribs)
→‎Adolph Hitler edit: Darwin quote on scientific problems
Nukeh (talk | contribs)
→‎"testable forces": Control WP Editing of Articles POV
Line 41: Line 41:
:::Anti-Amish POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&diff=203090565&oldid=203088478 [[User:Nukeh|Doug Youvan]] ([[User talk:Nukeh#top|talk]]) 22:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Anti-Amish POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&diff=203090565&oldid=203088478 [[User:Nukeh|Doug Youvan]] ([[User talk:Nukeh#top|talk]]) 22:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Anti-Physics POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&diff=202574549&oldid=202566772 [[User:Nukeh|Doug Youvan]] ([[User talk:Nukeh#top|talk]]) 22:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Anti-Physics POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&diff=202574549&oldid=202566772 [[User:Nukeh|Doug Youvan]] ([[User talk:Nukeh#top|talk]]) 22:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Control WP Editing of Articles POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hrafn&diff=prev&oldid=207149325

===Adolph Hitler edit===
===Adolph Hitler edit===
I don't know what weird angle you're coming from with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education&diff=208193133&oldid=207886246 this edit] (maybe confusing fact and value?), but I'd be very interested in hearing how it has ''anything'' to do with the subject of the article. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] ([[User talk:Richard001|talk]]) 23:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't know what weird angle you're coming from with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education&diff=208193133&oldid=207886246 this edit] (maybe confusing fact and value?), but I'd be very interested in hearing how it has ''anything'' to do with the subject of the article. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] ([[User talk:Richard001|talk]]) 23:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:07, 26 April 2008

Archives, Other Files, and Images

Archive 0 - [1]

Archive 1 - 4/7/2008 [2]

Archive 2 - Starting 4/8/2008 [3]

Archive Bit Bucket - Bit Bucket

Sandbox for testing - [4]

Sandbox for new WP article on Obscene Profit(s) - [5]

Sandbox for new WP article on An Amish View of the Physics of Time Asymmetry - [6]

Sandbox for new WP article on "Lobbyists as Puppets on Wikipedia" - [7]


Images on Wikimedia Commons - [8]

ITN

I just noticed that three of your nominations on WP:ITN/C were withdrawn. I want to recommend you go through the archives of ITN/C, to see what was brought up before, what made it to ITN and what didn't. Generally speaking fives types of events make it to ITN: major scientific breakthroughs, national elections, major sporting events, significant prizes/awards and incidents/tragedies/disasters. If you have any other questions about ITN/C, feel free to leave me a message. I see you are eager to help out, but I can imagine that withdrawing three nominations is not good for your motivation to continue. AecisBrievenbus 12:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern. At least we are not broadcast TV running the same few stories over and over again. One of my problems might be that I do not watch broadcast TV, nor do I read anything that requires a fee.
What I am discouraged about is WP's hate articles, which seem to be controlled by a few editors - if that. I spent a lot of time on YEC and related articles that try to debunk Creation with science, but a line is drawn such that nothing more fundamental than biology can be referenced. That's very strange, because good mathematicians and physicists know we are dealing with some very fundamental and unresolved issues in time, complexity, and P=NP. I call these hate articles, because YEC = Amish is true and can't be referenced. (YEC = stupid) is the POV of the controlling editors. But that leads to Amish = stupid, and that is false to an extent that is hateful.

Doug Youvan (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tariq Aziz

Please goto the Talk:Tariq Aziz page to justify your edits. -- Esemono (talk) 13:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation and evolution in public education

"testable forces"

FYI, I've unhidden and weighed in on discussion you started, here. NCdave (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dave - thanks. Those guys have greater editing skills than me, and I see you nailed a tag. I had no idea such a tag existed. Also, my attempts to insert Amish into the YEC article failed. My attempts to discuss the physics of time asymmetry anywhere these guys edit have also failed. I get gang banged. If one looks to money motivation, any chance these guys are part of a textbook lobby group? Anything that might change textbook content cost publishers a lot of money, and meatpuppets would be far cheaper. Doug Youvan (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-Molecular Biology POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACreation_and_evolution_in_public_education&diff=208160944&oldid=208157146 Doug Youvan (talk) 20:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neo-Nazi POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education&diff=208193848&oldid=208193133 Doug Youvan (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-Amish POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&diff=203090565&oldid=203088478 Doug Youvan (talk) 22:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-Physics POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&diff=202574549&oldid=202566772 Doug Youvan (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Control WP Editing of Articles POV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hrafn&diff=prev&oldid=207149325

Adolph Hitler edit

I don't know what weird angle you're coming from with this edit (maybe confusing fact and value?), but I'd be very interested in hearing how it has anything to do with the subject of the article. Richard001 (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"It is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science. - Charles Darwin"
  • Why someone would believe in Arthur de Gobineau's ideas of struggle for survival between the different races, among which the "Aryan race"—guided by "Providence" — was supposed to be the torchbearers of civilization?
Are you certain those three problems can be solved by science? Doug Youvan (talk) 00:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Nukeh!
We thank you for uploading Image:TUPLE.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Nukeh!
We thank you for uploading Image:Kcat.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]