User talk:Peanut4: Difference between revisions
Ron Hamence |
Award center newsletter delivery. |
||
Line 449: | Line 449: | ||
== Top leagues == |
== Top leagues == |
||
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_football&diff=215327508&oldid=215327241 this edit], the link does include this quote by [[Marcel Desailly]]: ''"However, if you talk with the Italians they would tell you that Serie A is the best league. The only difference is that the Premier League has a global following. I think that, tactically, the gap is not so big between England, Spain and Italy."''. But for sure a better source will need to be found. <small><font color="AE1C28">[[User:Jacoplane|JACO]]</font><font color="#21468B">[[User_talk:Jacoplane|PLANE]]</font> |
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_football&diff=215327508&oldid=215327241 this edit], the link does include this quote by [[Marcel Desailly]]: ''"However, if you talk with the Italians they would tell you that Serie A is the best league. The only difference is that the Premier League has a global following. I think that, tactically, the gap is not so big between England, Spain and Italy."''. But for sure a better source will need to be found. <small><font color="AE1C28">[[User:Jacoplane|JACO]]</font><font color="#21468B">[[User_talk:Jacoplane|PLANE]]</font> • 2008-05-29 19:23</small> |
||
== Ron Saggers == |
== Ron Saggers == |
||
Line 867: | Line 867: | ||
==Ron Hamence== |
==Ron Hamence== |
||
Thank you very much for the review. Your comments and suggestions have improved the article immeasurably. -- [[User:Mattinbgn|Mattinbgn]]\<sup>[[User talk:Mattinbgn|talk]]</sup> 04:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
Thank you very much for the review. Your comments and suggestions have improved the article immeasurably. -- [[User:Mattinbgn|Mattinbgn]]\<sup>[[User talk:Mattinbgn|talk]]</sup> 04:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
== [[WP:AWC|Award Center]] Newsletter == |
|||
{{Wikipedia:AWC/newsletter/archive/4}} - ''[[User:Newsletterbot|<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px" color="#248011">Newsletter Bot</font>]] [[User talk:Newsletterbot|'''''<font face="High Tower Text" size="1px" color="#0016FF">Talk</font>]]'' 02:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC) <small>If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name [[User:Sharkface217/Award Center/newsletter/exclude|here.]]</small> |
Revision as of 02:13, 21 June 2008
This is Peanut4's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
Everything is now finished bt Jaron or me. Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 19:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- And reworded. Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 16:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- I reworded it again. I don't think it was just one single person who found out, it was probably just known. Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 17:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- And you'll definitely like it now (I hope) Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 17:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- I reworded it again. I don't think it was just one single person who found out, it was probably just known. Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 17:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Bright Idea Barnstar | |
The Bright Idea Barnstar, awarded for your invaulable assistance working on Philadelphia Phillies seasons. Couldn't have done it without your sharp eyes. Thanks! KV5 (talk) 23:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for all your input. This has been a real eye-opener, and it's great to work with experienced reviewers. I appreciate your help. KV5 (talk) 23:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Done + Expanded lead. Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 20:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've done everything, except I can't expand the lead, (which seems to meet WP:LEAD, and the best I got to a sortable table was this Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 21:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, do you have any further comments on List of New England Patriots head coaches? Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 21:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I've expanded List of San Diego Chargers head coaches as much as possible, and you have a question in the FLC. Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 20:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Please see the lead. I'm currently merging some paragraphs at the moment, but you can get a basic view. Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 21:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I've expanded List of San Diego Chargers head coaches as much as possible, and you have a question in the FLC. Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 20:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, do you have any further comments on List of New England Patriots head coaches? Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 21:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Unlucky thirteen
No problemo, I simply interpreted a line on the Bradford official page as literal - "released on Tuesday afternoon." I'll wait till Saturday, but you never know, McCall may use the last game as an opportunity to try out some youngsters, seeing as our league position is safe. Best regards, GiantSnowman 20:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Erm, sorry about doing the exact same edit. Should have checked beforehand. 82.219.210.17 (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the pointers, i believe they have all been resolved and would be grateful if you would take another look, cheers. Eddie6705 (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry to seem nagging but all comments from other users have been dealt with and i would like to satisfy your suggestions on the article, cheers. Eddie6705 (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look ;) Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 23:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2008
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Bradford away kit
Hi Peanut, don't know if you've seen the new City Away kit (and it's a cracker by the way) but it's been confirmed as an all-white affair, as seen here. My question is this: when should we change the kit on the main page? Kind regards, GiantSnowman 16:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, I've changed the kit (as best as I could!) and added a reference, hope it all looks OK. GiantSnowman 18:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tried to include the claret & amber but couldn't find a suitable design. If you manage to find one then I'll add it, but if not then it'll unfortunately have to stay as it is. GiantSnowman 19:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
df=y
Hey man. I'm afraid I don't quite understand the purpose of this parameter. Can you explain it to me? – PeeJay 21:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- But surely it's a bit presumptuous to force a particular date style on people? – PeeJay 22:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough. I see now. Thanks. – PeeJay 22:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Re:Featured lists
It's understandable. I'll just remove it from all the lists since the other ones already featured (see my userpage) don't have a history section. I will however create pages like "History of ____________ coaches" - Is this OK with you? Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 01:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright. I'll expand the leads, and I'll make History of ... coaches. Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 01:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
List of New England Patriots head coaches seems to have a decent lead. Do you have any further comments on it? Thanks, Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 18:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- ...and List of San Diego Chargers head coaches as well. Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 19:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Did you see the messages above? « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 19:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Premier League
This is what I thought of the nicknames. They were unneccessary, I have never heard of them. Only the most common, and referenced nicknames should be there, if we need nicknames at all. Complete removal would be something for the talkpage I think. Regards. Woody (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Looked into it a bit more, thought about it a bit more and here is what I came up with: diff. ;) Hope all is good. Regards. Woody (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
5/7 DYK
--Bedford 18:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well done! --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 18:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Sam Cowan
Yeah, I saw the article was in a poor state and resolved to get it over 1000 words and fully referenced by the end of the weekend. I've just added a sentence which unfortunately represents the sum total of my material about his time at Bradford. The fee must have been very high for a 34 year old. In other matters, I've responded to the comments you left at the Kinkladze FAC, could you take a look to see if the responses meet with your satisfaction? Oldelpaso (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- You may have noticed that my proofreading is horrific, thanks for hoovering up my errors. I saw your recent DYK nom, it had me scampering to check Steve Claridge's record. He nearly manages 6 levels but is missing the Conference. Oldelpaso (talk) 09:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Jonathan McLaughlin
Yep no problem, if/when he plays then simply put him for a Deletion Review, the article should be recreated then no probs. Cheers for the heads up! GiantSnowman 22:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
DYK nom
--Gatoclass (talk) 09:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi
I've started my own wiki on the European Football Championship, wikieuro08.altervista.org, can you help me? Thanks Ciaociao (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Milford Mercury
Maybe you should talk to your colleagues at the Milford Mercury - they are quite able to use diacritics. At least the previous reporter was. Agathoclea (talk) 13:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
| |
If you are familiar with or like using photoshop or the GIMP, your help is needed to create some special awards for an important upcoming AWC project. Please contact The Transhumanist ''
New challenges include:
|
In case you ever get lost:
|
- Newsletter Bot Talk 22:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)The above newsletter was delivered by Newsletterbot (talk · contribs). If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.
Kinkladze again
Following the failure of the FAC nomination for Georgi Kinkladze, I have opened another peer review in an attempt to get the article ready for a second nomination. As you commented on the FAC, I would value your opinion of whether the issues you raised have been resolved, and details of any further issues you have. Oldelpaso (talk) 13:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
European Championship Tables
I think it would look good if they were on because England are the most important footballing country —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 09:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
FAR review
Brian Close has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Brianboulton (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for Peer Review help
Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.
1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...
2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.
3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.
Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for a peer review
Hi, we at WP:AFL are looking for an external user from to provide a peer review for one of our articles, Joel Selwood. The article is currently undergoing an extensive peer review, and your comments as a fresh reviewer with no necessary knowledge of the sporting code would be most appreciated. In particular, in helping us address any concerns regarding issues with jargon etc. Kind regards. Boomtish (talk) 10:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Middlesbrough Peer Review
I'd just like to say thanks for your help with the peer review. I think we've acted on many of your suggestions so hopefully it shouldn't be too long before we get it to FA status!Mofs (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, farewell
Hi there PEANUT, this is VASCO from PORTUGAL,
I am leaving WP for good, after almost two years helping to the best of my abilities (lots of soccer edits, lots of vandalism removed), and lots of accusations (maybe some due to the fact i never opened an account) of being a vandal and more rude words i would have liked to hear, but oh well...Anyway...
I just want to thank you for making edits on PEPE (brazilian footballer, REAL MADRID), regarding his goal total. You don't know the mess you have gotten yourself into man...Why? Check this out, conversations between user 202.75.80.182 and yours truly.
I knew PEPE had no goals, but an own goal against CORUÑA, so reverted to 0 league goals, everytime i saw 1 written, and this other user re-reverted to 1 goal, and justified (please check PEPE's edit history) with the following: "Goals are included. Own goals are NOT excluded."). After i tried to make him see "the light", his answer (lacking class, friendliness, and so on, so on) was THIS:
"According to your reference, I like to apologize about my edits as you referred. But I just want to know. What is the meaning of adding 22 goals on Spanish cup? I only stated that he scored 1 goal for the league, but 0 for CUP. Are you trying to VANDALISE the article before saying I'm trying to add silly edits? If you say YES, I will forgive you, because you only put 22 goals on CUP section. If you say NO, FUCK off.
Anyway, I stated that he scored 1 goal, because I think that goal is a good goal. You are welcome to give me any comments on my talk section, but don't give me any nonsense, such as it's just an own goal, or OWN goals are BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD. Thank You.
From China, a nice week,"
WHAT A JERK, my friend, i hope you, by reverting it to 0 GOALS, will not also hear from this individual, who thinks an own goal is a good goal...
Explaining my title in message (GREETINGS, FAREWELL), greet you because we talk 4 the first time, and bid you farewell because it's also 4 the last time, i am definitely stopping all editing and HELPING, just consulting from now on, but you can, if interested, reply to me on my talk page, i will browse it from time to time, just NO EDITING...
Enough said, my friend, all the best from PORTUGAL, have a nice life,
VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 23:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Top leagues
Regarding this edit, the link does include this quote by Marcel Desailly: "However, if you talk with the Italians they would tell you that Serie A is the best league. The only difference is that the Premier League has a global following. I think that, tactically, the gap is not so big between England, Spain and Italy.". But for sure a better source will need to be found. JACOPLANE • 2008-05-29 19:23
Ron Saggers
Thanks for your help with the GA, appreciate it. SGGH speak! 22:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Peter Jackson (footballer born 1937)
--BorgQueen (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Looks like we'll be taking it to RM then. – PeeJay 19:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire - June 2008 Newsletter
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Finals template
Hmm, we'll you could probably incorporate something that would be similar to the regular {{footballbox}} as they use for the matches in FIFA World Cup Finals, though through another template which have a hide/show alternative. Shown here {{Liverpool F.C. season 2007-08 game log}} The template in there could probably be incorporated with the Fb finals one. ← chandler 14:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Luton Town
Hmmm. Good call. I hadn't seen any FA Statement, and the BBC article didn't convince me that I was wrong, but that cleared it up. Sorry for the inconvenience. Falastur2 (talk) 21:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- To get firm clarification, I started a new topic at WP:FOOTBALL ten minutes or so ago. It's probably mute now anyway, now that we've found consensus. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Request for Review
Hi, I have been working on an article titled Iowa High School Athletic Association. If you can find the time, would you please give it a look over? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradenkeith (talk • contribs) 19:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit without explanation, please? Linking schools is good practice so that when an article on the school is created then alumni show up. Smile a While (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Smile a While (talk) 00:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Good articles newsletter
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 02:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
George Murphy
After having a look in Football League Players' Records 1888 - 1939, it indeed is him - I'll change the link. Thanks for finding this out. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
York Park
Hi Peanut4, thanks for your suggestions for York Park, I'll endeavour to fix it up! Just one question - you suggest converting to prose - I thought that parts such as the list of highest crowds would be better presented as a list (or a table)? -- Chuq (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Ronnie Wallwork
I'm thinking about putting Ronnie Wallwork up for peer review later in the week, as I've done pretty much all I can on it now, bar the odd tweak. Do you think there's much more to add or are you OK for me to get it reviewed soon? I've now finished my BCAFC review comments btw (sorry there's so many bullet points! hope it's of some use). Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, will go for PR first, then put it up for GAN later. One question (apologies if I missed it in the article) - have they always been Bradford City A.F.C. or were they ever Bradford City F.C.? --Jameboy (talk) 01:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Now up for peer review. I've managed to add a few comments from Robson re: Wallwork's qualities - not a complete "Style of Play" section like some articles but hopefully it will suffice. Still missing those England under-20 stats but hopefully those will follow soon. Thanks again for your help with this article, particularly the MoS edits and improving the wording - sometimes I just need to slap the words down on the page and can't always think how best to phrase it! Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 23:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Richard Rundle's website
You stated here in the hyperlink that Rundle owned Footballsite. However, according to Rundle's userpage, he owns the FCHD BT Internet site. To avoid any confusion, I've slightly changed your comment at Ealdgyth's talkpage, see here as Rundle owns the BTInternet site, not the Football site. I hope you don't mind. Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 08:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- I take it your most recent comment at Ealdgyth's talkpage was aimed at me. Ealdgyth may put on a "confused" face when she sees that comment, as I haven't commented on the discussion at her talkpage. D.M.N. (talk) 19:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Ron Hamence
Thank you very much for the review. Your comments and suggestions have improved the article immeasurably. -- Mattinbgn\talk 04:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Award Center Newsletter
Wikipedia:AWC/newsletter/archive/4 - Newsletter Bot Talk 02:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC) If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.