Talk:Samir Arora: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:54, 27 July 2008

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Articles about NetOjects Inc. and NetObjects Fusion to follow soon. --Peter Eisenburger 06:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits of 64.121.49.97

Have reverted changes from anonymous user IP

Edits were a mixture of

deletions without rationales: Samir Arora indeed took prominent part in creating the term “web site”

errors: NetObjects, Inc. was not the successor of Rae; Rae was a affiliate of Apple, NETO of IBM; while its true that there was an initial investmant by Rae - NETO was not the successor in a legal way; the relation between Rae and NETO will be covered in my forthcoming NETO article, it should not be a part of the introduction to this bio

errors: Rae is not defunct

irrelevant details: relationship between brothers; however I would accept when edited this point again.

Feel free to discuss on discussion page. But always give rationales when you delete sth. --Peter Eisenburger 20:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VF

Personal e-mail from Samir Arora to the first author of this article with biographical details.

is not. Rich Farmbrough, 16:02 22 September 2006 (GMT).

I will add more external links.--Peter Eisenburger 17:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Sdsouza 20:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All sources, that are available over the Web, have been worked through diligently. As long as I am not allowed to use original research I can't extend the article. --Peter Eisenburger 17:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't items that cannot be verified with references, be removed? Given our different viewpoints, I will leave it to you Peter to decide rather than make the edits myself given this is on of your pages that you track...--Obgydd 23:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your behaviour well. "Our different viewpoints" were that you deleted referenced facts in articles about companies that you are affiliated with in some way. Now you come with your sockpuppet account, check my work and give me warnings.

I wrote this article at a time when I used to reference mainly with "external links and references". Since you follow my work now you have seen that lately in my articles I reference each single statement in the separate reference section. (As it is up-to-date now in English Wikipedia. I'm German. Here we don't need the "Einzelnachweis").

Each fact of this article can be found in the external links or in articles of referenced internal wiki links. But since I'm working through new material for another article I will give more links for your convenience.--Peter Eisenburger 07:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. I was checking out your work, by the way, out of curiosity. If the references are there, no need to make changes on my account.--Obgydd 13:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NETO financials; POV

In the sum the latest edits look POV to me. Especially I found the statements about NETO's financials not well placed in the context and poorly sourced. The source only shows numbers of 2000/01 as far as I could see. Anyways there are only published numbers since going public in 1999. So you can't say "did never show a profit". I think the description of NETO financials in the corresponding NetObjects article are fair enough, so I deleted this one sentence. I also think, "as a teenager" gives a special taste to the sentence. These works were between the age of 16 and 19. The creation years are given and that says it all. --Peter Eisenburger (talk) 16:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the editor says it all. I will re-introduce the sentence.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 07:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glam

"Web property" should be consensual. It's the jargon of Comscore. - "Owns London-based agency" is wrong. Ex-Monetise is now a part of Glam.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 18:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 Shouldn't items that cannot be verified with references, be removed? Given our different viewpoints, I will leave it to you Peter to decide rather than make the edits myself given this is on of your pages that you track...--[[User:Obgydd|Obgydd]] 23:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 :I understand your behaviour well. "Our different viewpoints" were that you deleted referenced facts in articles about companies that you are affiliated with in some way. Now you come with your sockpuppet account, check my work and give me warnings.
-:I wrote this article at a time when I used to reference mainly with "external links and references". Since you follow my work now you have seen that lately in my articles I reference each single statement in the separate reference section. (As it is up-to-date  now in English Wikipedia. I'm German. Here we don't need the "Einzelnachweis", a strong leader will do!).
+:I wrote this article at a time when I used to reference mainly with "external links and references". Since you follow my work now you have seen that lately in my articles I reference each single statement in the separate reference section. (As it is up-to-date  now in English Wikipedia. I'm German. Here we don't need the "Einzelnachweis").
 :Each fact of this article can be found in the external links or in articles of referenced internal wiki links. But since I'm working through new material for another article I will give more links for your convenience.--[[User:Peter Eisenburger|Peter Eisenburger]] 07:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 Sounds good to me.  I was checking out your work, by the way, out of curiosity.  If the references are there, no need to make changes on my account.--[[User:Obgydd|Obgydd]] 13:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)