Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Dead Lock Up: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:52, 5 August 2008

Living Dead Lock Up

(delete) – (View log) Fails WP:N and WP:V, at least as it currently stands. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability for films. Almost everyone involved is a red link, and there are no sources to back up the material. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 22:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Renier J. Murillo as well. Fails WP:BIO. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 01:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 23:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Created at a university on a $200 budget, I don't see its notability. --Porqin (talk) 00:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I managed to find a few reviews ([1], [2], [3]), but I don't think that's enough to establish notability. PC78 (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - also added article to this AfD on only blue-link bio within the group, which also appears to fail notability standards. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 00:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as I have just added 6 film reviews to the article's EL list. Cannot help all the redlinks, as even newcomers have to start somehwere.. and I'll be hapy to clean them up, but the film itself does have a (strange) notabilty. I was amazed at the number of hits I found on Google. Must be a very popular torrent. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 04:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I do agree however to delete the artcile about Renier J. Murillo. Being a part of a (slightly) notable film does not make him notable. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Never heard of it. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Neither had I... until this AfD. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 06:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since this fails WP:V and WP:RS. Cliff smith ^talk 16:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just because you have not heard of it does not mean that others have not. However, there is simply not enough information cited to show notability from what I observed. (Roodhouse1 (talk) 23:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people|list of Living people-related deletion discussions]].  </small> <small>-- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 06:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' since this fails [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]].  [[User:Cliff smith|<font color="blue">'''<font face="georgia">Cliff''' smith</font></font>]] [[User talk:Cliff smith|''<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>'']] 16:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
+'''Comment''' Just because you have not heard of it does not mean that others have not. However, there is simply not enough information cited to show notability from what I observed. ([[User:Roodhouse1|Roodhouse1]] ([[User talk:Roodhouse1|talk]]) 23:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC))