Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/HappyCat12: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:56, 16 August 2008

HappyCat12

Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 19:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

HappyCat12 (talk · contribs) - I Use Wikipedia a lot and fix Vandalism and errors. I have good grammar and a native English speaker. I am part of the Counter-Vandalism Unit, Typo Team, and Recent Changes Patrollers. HappyCat12 (talk) 19:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I would intend to control and reverse vandalism

and assist other users.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Patrolling Recent Changes

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No, I haven't been in any.

General comments

See HappyCat12's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Links for HappyCat12: HappyCat12 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/HappyCat12 before commenting.

Discussion

I have transcluded this RfA for the candidate seeing as they do not know how. Tiptoety ^talk 20:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did HappyCat12 ask for the RfA to be transcluded? EJF (talk) 20:17, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the conversation regarding the candidates request to transclude this? Pedro : Chat 20:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't everyone jump on me at once, I guess I just assumed that adding the RfA notice to your userpage generally indicates you are ready for people to !vote, right? Feel free to untransclude if I did something wrong. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 20:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dude, but best chat with the editor first IMHO. Pedro : Chat 20:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-transcluded per this. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:47, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Moral Support While I appreciate your enthusiasm to help Wikipedia via adminship, you're still too new. Such few edits like you have doesn't give the community enough evidence with which we can judge your knowledge of policies and procedures. It is an extremely rare event that an editor with fewer than 2000 edits gain adminship. You'll probably want to wait several months and a couple thousand edits and then apply again. You'll also want to get more experience in admin-like areas, such as Articles For Deletion, Vandal Reporting, etc. If you ever have any questions about anything, don't hesitate to ask me. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is not transcluded. Let's refrain from making comments and !voting until the user wishes it to go live. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 20:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Live now. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:44, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose with moral support — Sorry to be the first one to do this but it's really for your own benefit to hear it! I'm sorry to oppose, I like your attitude towards this so far and you have made some positive steps in becoming a good contributor to the project and there is no reason to believe this enthusiasm won't continue into adminship. However, you do have a lack of experience in many areas since you're still so new to the site. I'd encourage you to participate more in this process, RfA, and focus heavily upon areas such as requests for page protection, criteria for speedy deletion and reporting vandals. There are other areas to participate too, but I'll leave you to discover those on your own. You have my sincere support for any future applications unless there is any logical reason not to at that time. Happy editing! —Cyclonenim^T@lk? 21:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose:Little or no experience in any and all areas. I really wish noobie editors would read the guide to adminship before applying; 3 or 4 times a week I see people who have ridiculously low edit counts and experience applying despite the Clear information in the guide about what is usually expected. Ironho lds 21:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 =====Oppose=====
 #'''Oppose with moral support''' — Sorry to be the first one to do this but it's really for your own benefit to hear it! I'm sorry to oppose, I like your attitude towards this so far and you have made some positive steps in becoming a good contributor to the project and there is no reason to believe this enthusiasm won't continue into adminship. However, you do have a lack of experience in many areas since you're still so new to the site. I'd encourage you to participate more in this process, RfA, and focus heavily upon areas such as [[WP:RFPP|requests for page protection]], [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] and [[WP:AIV|reporting vandals]]. There are other areas to participate too, but I'll leave you to discover those on your own. You have my sincere support for any future applications unless there is any logical reason not to at that time. Happy editing! —<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2px">'''[[User:Cyclonenim|''Cyclonenim'']]'''</font><sup><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">[[User_talk:Cyclonenim|T@lk?]]</font></sup> 21:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
+#'''Oppose''':Little or no experience in any and all areas. I ''really'' wish noobie editors would read the guide to adminship before applying; 3 or 4 times a week I see people who have ridiculously low edit counts and experience applying despite the [[Wikipedia:Guide_to_requests_for_adminship#What_RfA_contributors_look_for_and_hope_to_see|Clear information in the guide about what is usually expected]]. [[User:Ironholds|<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b>]][[User talk:Ironholds|<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b>]] 21:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 =====Neutral=====
 #