Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30 Days of Night: Dust to Dust: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Websites |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Weak keep'''. As an Internet-targetted film, [[WP:WEB]] is probably the more appropriate guideline. Was picked up for distribution by Time Warner Cable-on-Demand, which appears to satisfy [[WP:WEB]] condition 3. Possible sources: [http://www.comcast.com/About/PressRelease/PressReleaseDetail.ashx?PRID=781] [http://www.scifi.co.uk/articles/2008/07/news-from-07142008-to-07202008.php]. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] ([[User talk:JulesH|talk]]) 17:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep'''. As an Internet-targetted film, [[WP:WEB]] is probably the more appropriate guideline. Was picked up for distribution by Time Warner Cable-on-Demand, which appears to satisfy [[WP:WEB]] condition 3. Possible sources: [http://www.comcast.com/About/PressRelease/PressReleaseDetail.ashx?PRID=781] [http://www.scifi.co.uk/articles/2008/07/news-from-07142008-to-07202008.php]. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] ([[User talk:JulesH|talk]]) 17:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Raven1977|Raven1977]] ([[User talk:Raven1977|talk]]) 17:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Raven1977|Raven1977]] ([[User talk:Raven1977|talk]]) 17:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
* '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:StonerDude420|StonerDude420]] ([[User talk:StonerDude420|talk]]) 18:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:21, 3 January 2009
- 30 Days of Night: Dust to Dust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This miniseries which was only available via the internet or via On Demand programming has not received any attention in reliable sources that I can find, and I can find no evidence that it meets either the general notability criteria or the film notability criteria. Raven1977 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Weak keep. As an Internet-targetted film, WP:WEB is probably the more appropriate guideline. Was picked up for distribution by Time Warner Cable-on-Demand, which appears to satisfy WP:WEB condition 3. Possible sources: [1] [2]. JulesH (talk) 17:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. StonerDude420 (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)