User talk:Colonies Chris: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:28, 14 February 2009

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Welcome!

Hello Colonies Chris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- GraemeL ^(talk) 22:41, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

The following temporary injunction has been passed in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking;

Until this case is decided or otherwise directed by the Arbitration Committee, all editors are instructed not to engage in any program of mass linking or delinking of dates in existing articles, including but not limited to through the use of bots, scripts, tools, or otherwise. This injunction is entered as an interim measure and does not reflect any prejudgment of any aspect of the case.

For the Arbitration Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 11:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments at Workshop

I'm sure you must have seen the analysis I did here. Do let me know if there are any more I may have overlooked. Ohconfucius (talk) 15:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It may interesting to see what the other side has to say about date linking. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 ==Your comments at Workshop==
 I'm sure you must have seen the analysis I did [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Date_delinking/Evidence#Edit_warring_by_User:Tennis_expert|here]]. Do let me know if there are any more I may have overlooked. [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 15:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+:It may interesting to see what the [[User:Kendrick7/Summary of the Date Linking RFCs|other side]] has to say about date linking. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 01:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)