User talk:Closetindex: Difference between revisions
→March 2009: re |
Closetindex (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
Agreed. I added by the sourced portion and agree to leave out the unsourced portion. Is this okay? [[User:Closetindex|Closetindex]] ([[User talk:Closetindex#top|talk]]) 00:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex |
Agreed. I added by the sourced portion and agree to leave out the unsourced portion. Is this okay? [[User:Closetindex|Closetindex]] ([[User talk:Closetindex#top|talk]]) 00:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex |
||
:Sure, I actually didn't intent to remove it but since I'm using rollback it was removed anyway. Btw, did you use the right source on the Jens Pulver article? I couldn't find anything about her entering the cage in it. Also, be mindful of or [[WP:NPOV|netural point of view]]-policy. Writing things like "In a touching personal moment" isn't really encyclopedic. Cheers, --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 00:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
:Sure, I actually didn't intent to remove it but since I'm using rollback it was removed anyway. Btw, did you use the right source on the Jens Pulver article? I couldn't find anything about her entering the cage in it. Also, be mindful of or [[WP:NPOV|netural point of view]]-policy. Writing things like "In a touching personal moment" isn't really encyclopedic. Cheers, --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 00:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
Agreed, but it makes for good drama :) I linked to Jens blog, which mentions the miscarriage, but still does not prove that she entered the ring. Perhaps I should re-edit it. Also, I added back some of quote about Royce and agree with you about original research... I guess it is just my own theory as to why he used steriods. [[User:Closetindex|Closetindex]] ([[User talk:Closetindex#top|talk]]) 00:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex |
Revision as of 00:58, 22 March 2009
Welcome!
|
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --aktsu (t / c) 00:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. I added by the sourced portion and agree to leave out the unsourced portion. Is this okay? Closetindex (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex
- Sure, I actually didn't intent to remove it but since I'm using rollback it was removed anyway. Btw, did you use the right source on the Jens Pulver article? I couldn't find anything about her entering the cage in it. Also, be mindful of or netural point of view-policy. Writing things like "In a touching personal moment" isn't really encyclopedic. Cheers, --aktsu (t / c) 00:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreed, but it makes for good drama :) I linked to Jens blog, which mentions the miscarriage, but still does not prove that she entered the ring. Perhaps I should re-edit it. Also, I added back some of quote about Royce and agree with you about original research... I guess it is just my own theory as to why he used steriods. Closetindex (talk) 00:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex