User talk:Director: Difference between revisions
→Parliament of Dalmatia: new section |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
P.S.: probably you can use [[Grožnjan|this layout]] (just guessing, I ignore the exact style conventions for it). --[[User:Yuma|Yuma]] ([[User talk:Yuma|talk]]) 11:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
P.S.: probably you can use [[Grožnjan|this layout]] (just guessing, I ignore the exact style conventions for it). --[[User:Yuma|Yuma]] ([[User talk:Yuma|talk]]) 11:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Parliament of Dalmatia == |
|||
DIREKTOR, please voice your opinion on the [[Parliament of Dalmatia]] article. |
|||
There is a dispute whether next to Croatian and Italian (Serbo-Croatian as a compromise I have ruled out, due to the unpopularity of the term among others involved in the dispute) Serbian (and whether Cyrillic too or not) should be added. |
|||
It seems that some users have, also, (mis?)understood the presence of Serbian in the insulting and provocative, due to the recent conflicts between Serb and Croat peoples in the Balkan peninsular. |
|||
Could you voice your opinion on the article? Thanks, --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] ([[User talk:PaxEquilibrium|talk]]) 11:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:50, 8 April 2009
Sign (~~~~) before you save.
Home Talk Contributions Archives Make yourself at home.... | |
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator electionThe Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! Military history WikiProject coordinator electionThe Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. Chetniks/Draza MihailovicHey, apparently you have a problem with my edits. I'm not trying to be naive or anything, and I apologize if I do, but I actually had some sources listed for ally-aiding actions that the Chetniks did. If you think "pro-allied" is a wrong choice of words, I'll respect you're knowledge about the matter, but at least dont delete all the references, they are no less important than the references that say the Chetniks were complete collaborators. I just want to talk about it, that's all. I left you're edits alone, I promise I didn't put any of my edits back. I just wanted to talk about it. Write to me why I couldn't write what I wrote or what I did wrong Balkanskiredneck (talk) 21:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok, so when I have the time, I'll probly stop by one day and list some references and ask people in the discussion to discuss about how and if my references could be used and how, and whatever else I need to ask. as a matter of fact I actually don't edit here too much, it's just been this past week I've been goin around here a bit as to studying for high school and not. But I'll remember take you're advise sometime soon. hvala Balkanskiredneck (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Zadar Bombing WWIIwhy did you delete my job on the Zadar bombing article and the source reference, Direktor ? Cunibertus (talk) 21:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. BaleI don't get the point of this edit. Unless you want to feed conspiracionist trolls, of course. --Yuma (talk) 11:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC) P.S.: probably you can use this layout (just guessing, I ignore the exact style conventions for it). --Yuma (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC) Parliament of DalmatiaDIREKTOR, please voice your opinion on the Parliament of Dalmatia article. There is a dispute whether next to Croatian and Italian (Serbo-Croatian as a compromise I have ruled out, due to the unpopularity of the term among others involved in the dispute) Serbian (and whether Cyrillic too or not) should be added. It seems that some users have, also, (mis?)understood the presence of Serbian in the insulting and provocative, due to the recent conflicts between Serb and Croat peoples in the Balkan peninsular. Could you voice your opinion on the article? Thanks, --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |