Jump to content

User talk:Graham87: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Ccdsb - "→‎Homemaker info deleted!!!!: new section"
→‎Korydaleus: new section
Line 86: Line 86:
Thanks to let me know as I would like to understand
Thanks to let me know as I would like to understand
ccdsb <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ccdsb|Ccdsb]] ([[User talk:Ccdsb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ccdsb|contribs]]) 16:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
ccdsb <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ccdsb|Ccdsb]] ([[User talk:Ccdsb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ccdsb|contribs]]) 16:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Korydaleus ==

You removed Korydaleos from the list of Cremonini's famous students because you only got 3 Google hits. Trully, this is the criterion taht an ignorant would use. So, in order to "refresh your memory", read at least the following books:

*Cléoblue Tsourkas, ''Les Débuts de l'enseignement philosophique et de la libre pensée dans les Balkans La vie et l'oeuvre de Théophile Corydalée (1563-1646)'', 2-ème éd. revisée et complétée. Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessalonique, 1967
*George Henderson, ''The revival of Greek thought, 1620-1830'', Albany: SUNY Press, 1970

You can also check the following articles (I gather you are not the kind of guy that loves to read, since the first place where ypu went to find something on Korydaleos was Google; articles are shorter, you can eventually ask someone to read them to you):

*Raphael Demos, "The Neo-hellenic Enlightenment" (1750-1821), ''Journal of the History of Ideas'', Vol. 19, No. 4 (Oct., 1958), pp. 523-541
*George Henderson, "Greek Philosophy from 1600 to 1850, ''The Philosophical Quarterly'', Vol. 5, No. 19 (Apr., 1955), pp. 157-165

Another thing: try a Google search on "Korydaleus".

[[Special:Contributions/88.177.243.61|88.177.243.61]] ([[User talk:88.177.243.61|talk]]) 19:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:15, 14 April 2009

Archives:

March 2005 to March 2006 April 2006 to December 2006 January 2007 to May 2007 June 2007 to September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 to April 2008 May 2008 to June 2008 July 2008 to September 2008 October 2008 to December 2008 January 2009 to March 2009|-

Blocking Giano II

Do not ever joke block someone without their permission. I would argue that you shouldn't even with their permission. If Giano takes offense at your block you could be in some quite serious trouble. Prodego talk 04:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, Graham....did you make sure the autoblock has been lifted? It lasts 24 hours, regardless of the length of the block. Please see to this immediately if you haven't already. Risker (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(EC) I blocked with the autoblock disabled, so that shouldn't be a problem. I didn't think about the block showing up for three hours though. Yeah I realise I could get into bad trouble with this - I didn't get his permission beforehand. I won't do it again. Graham87 05:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graham! Would you consider userfying this article for me?

Thanks in advance. (Please reply here) decltype (talk) 09:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, it's at User:Decltype/Jenny Was a Friend of Mine. There was a talk page with content, if you're interested in it. Because it was proposed for deletion, you're allowed to move it back into article space at any time. Graham87 09:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! If there's anything on the talk page worth salvaging I would really like to have that as well. decltype (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. The talk page is now at User talk:Decltype/Jenny Was a Friend of Mine. Graham87 11:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Not much to work with, though. Hopefully I'll be able to dig up some sources to establish notability. Thanks again. decltype (talk) 11:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me.. info on Hereditary Multiple Exostoses needs to be removed!

Dear Graham 87 Besides being webmaster for Dr. Paley... Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (MHE/ MO/ HME) I am The MHE Research Foundation Vice President & National Director of Research Executive Director, The MHE National Research Registry & Coordinator of Clinical Information Liaison Officer, University of Antwerp, Department of Genetics, BelgiumLiaison Officer, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Genetics Unit, Bologna Italy

I clearly know the genetics of the EXT genes and this info is useless. work directly on the geentics of the EXT 1 gene and the EXT 2 gene.

I ahve taken this info down! One mutation on EXT 1 that causes HME is at the 340 codon where arginine changes to cysteine. Genetic Code For Genetic Mutation -EXT 1 Nucleotide Sequence

There are hunreds of mutions in the EXT 1 one gene and the EXT 2 gene.

I am co-oranzing the 3rd International conference on this disease http://mheresearchfoundation.org/MHE_Conference.html and there is video on the genetics of this disease located on the foundations website... The MHE Research Foundations website is the largest in the world for this disease and we are an affiliate of the Glycobiolgy Socitety and many many others... OK Where the referance to heparan sulfate that is Glycoliology...and this is the defect with these two genes that to put it in simply terms make all the signaling pathway within these genetic go wrong...

Please do not undo... what I have done by removing this info...

The MHE Research Foundations website will over 300 webpages long... and if people are looking for detailed info this is where they can find it...

Thanks

Sarah —Preceding unsigned comment added by Szlimblengthening (talkcontribs) 15:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the problem , the link goes to an official page with his own blog and music you can listen to on it. Its not advertising, when there's nothing like that there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.134.18.186 (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sleepover

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sleepover, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDICDEF: the article describes a simple concept that is more fitting for a dictionary than an encyclopedia

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DarwinPeacock (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I concur, the page can be made encyclopedic with the proper expansions. I hope you work on adding these! DarwinPeacock (talk) 06:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Homemaker info deleted!!!!

Dear Graham87,

I did an entry on the above subject and you deleated because "it's not encyclopedic; Wikipedia isn't a how-to guide". I don't think my add was a how to guide but a proper addition to the actual information given. The information already available is not really encyclopedic - it states facts. I was also just stating facts. Is it the wording which was not write??????

Thanks to let me know as I would like to understand ccdsb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccdsb (talkcontribs) 16:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Korydaleus

You removed Korydaleos from the list of Cremonini's famous students because you only got 3 Google hits. Trully, this is the criterion taht an ignorant would use. So, in order to "refresh your memory", read at least the following books:

  • Cléoblue Tsourkas, Les Débuts de l'enseignement philosophique et de la libre pensée dans les Balkans La vie et l'oeuvre de Théophile Corydalée (1563-1646), 2-ème éd. revisée et complétée. Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessalonique, 1967
  • George Henderson, The revival of Greek thought, 1620-1830, Albany: SUNY Press, 1970

You can also check the following articles (I gather you are not the kind of guy that loves to read, since the first place where ypu went to find something on Korydaleos was Google; articles are shorter, you can eventually ask someone to read them to you):

  • Raphael Demos, "The Neo-hellenic Enlightenment" (1750-1821), Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Oct., 1958), pp. 523-541
  • George Henderson, "Greek Philosophy from 1600 to 1850, The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 19 (Apr., 1955), pp. 157-165

Another thing: try a Google search on "Korydaleus".

88.177.243.61 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]