Talk:Angel-A: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:00, 17 April 2009

France Stub‑class

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: French Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

Tone

"Besson delivers a beguiling romantic fantasy"

"If it's too slight and relies heavily on Debbouze's trademark motormouth act, it's still worth a look, if only as a reminder of how effective Besson can be without the Hollywood stars [...]"

While such fancy sentences may fit well in a film review, they convey subjective opinions that don't really belong here. A Wikipedia article should not tell its reader that a film is (or is not) "worth a look", for example. --Jonik 13:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this "article" is in serious need of editing. The plot section alone needs to be reworked to be less of a love letter to Besson. 24.24.244.132 (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 While such fancy sentences may fit well in a film review, they convey subjective opinions that don't really belong here. A Wikipedia article should not tell its reader that a film is (or is not) "worth a look", for example. --[[User:Jonik|Jonik]] 13:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- :Agreed, this "article" is in serious need of editing. The plot section alone needs to be reworked to be less of a love letter to Besson. [[Special:Contributions/24.24.244.132|24.24.244.132]] ([[User talk:24.24.244.132|talk]]) 10:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
+:Agreed, this "article" is in serious need of editing. The plot section alone needs to be reworked to be less of a love letter to Besson. [[Special:Contributions/24.24.244.132|24.24.244.132]] ([[User talk:24.24.244.132|talk]]) 10:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 == WikiProject class rating==