Talk:Ogier (law firm): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Not an advert, but certainly need radical help |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It wasn't intended to be an advert. I started the article some time ago as part of a series of articles on all of the firms in the [[offshore magic circle]], but I know little about Ogier other than the basics, so I wasn't able to flesh it out. I agree that the article needs some healthy and constructive input. --'''[[User:Legis|Legis]]''' <small>([[User talk:Legis|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Legis|contribs]])</small> 11:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
:It wasn't intended to be an advert. I started the article some time ago as part of a series of articles on all of the firms in the [[offshore magic circle]], but I know little about Ogier other than the basics, so I wasn't able to flesh it out. I agree that the article needs some healthy and constructive input. --'''[[User:Legis|Legis]]''' <small>([[User talk:Legis|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Legis|contribs]])</small> 11:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Fair enough. I only used that tag because it was already present, but visible in the article as it was mis-spelled. However, removing the promotional sounding COI edits will take it back down to a very short stub. Is the company really notable? Perhaps the information in [[offshore magic circle]] will suffice, without its own article? [[Special:Contributions/81.20.181.126|81.20.181.126]] ([[User talk:81.20.181.126|talk]]) 11:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:51, 6 May 2009
![]() | Law Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Marked this for speedy deletion. Someone else had previously tried to, but left a typo in the tag. Reads as a blatant advert, and most of the content was added early on by username Tomnewbald, who according to Google is the "Online Development Manager" for Ogiers. 81.20.181.126 (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- It wasn't intended to be an advert. I started the article some time ago as part of a series of articles on all of the firms in the offshore magic circle, but I know little about Ogier other than the basics, so I wasn't able to flesh it out. I agree that the article needs some healthy and constructive input. --Legis (talk - contribs) 11:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I only used that tag because it was already present, but visible in the article as it was mis-spelled. However, removing the promotional sounding COI edits will take it back down to a very short stub. Is the company really notable? Perhaps the information in offshore magic circle will suffice, without its own article? 81.20.181.126 (talk) 11:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)