Wikipedia:Requests for feedback: Difference between revisions
Tomjefferies (talk | contribs) |
Edward130603 (talk | contribs) →Nocturnes Op. 37 (Chopin): new section |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Tom Jefferies <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tomjefferies|Tomjefferies]] ([[User talk:Tomjefferies|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tomjefferies|contribs]]) 15:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Tom Jefferies <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tomjefferies|Tomjefferies]] ([[User talk:Tomjefferies|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tomjefferies|contribs]]) 15:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== [[Nocturnes Op. 37 (Chopin)]] == |
|||
This is an article about a pair of Chopin's nocturnes for piano. The article includes excerpts, summarys, the significance of these nocturnes, as well as quite a few other things. |
|||
After I started the article, many people significantly expanded it. I believe it is quite comprehensive now. |
|||
I am wondering if the B rating is appropriate. Also, how can this article be prepared for GA Assessment. Any improvements. |
|||
--'''[[User:Edward130603|Edward130603]]''' ([[User talk:Edward130603|talk]]) 20:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:21, 27 May 2009
Requests for Feedback |
|
Before you request feedback |
There are certain things which come up again and again so it may help if you deal with them before requesting feedback:
If you would like a beginner's guide to these sorts of issues, take a look at the article wizard. If you are unsure about how to edit Wikipedia articles, take a look at this tutorial. For a more general discussion of writing your first article, see "Your first article". |
How to post a request |
↓ Post your request using the box below. Replace "Untitled" with a wikilink to your article - e.g. [[User:Example/Lipsum]] or [[Cats]] ↓
|
After Receiving Feedback |
|
Are you providing feedback? |
|
(For help, see Wikipedia:Purge) |
---|
The previous few days of requests are transcluded below. The pages for the past 20 days are: (
user :James W. von Brunn
How do I get user: James W. von Brunn on Wikipedia website. Also I have a letter from Professor Revilo Oliver pertaining to Willis Carto that I want to attach. ??????? James von Brunn (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- The first step I'd suggest is reading WP:My first article, which has lots of information on how to write an article, what to put in it, and what not to put in it. It's the first stop for anyone who wants to write an article. You could also try taking a look at articles about similar people to get ideas of what is and is not acceptable for a Wikipedia article.
- However, there is one thing I'd like to point out- your username implies you are either this person or closely connected with them. In that case, I strongly suggest you read WP:COI, as you have a conflict of interest. If this is true, it may be best for you to request the article, rather than writing it yourself. You may also wish to read WP:Notability to see if this person should have an article (per Wikipedia guidelines). I hope this helps! --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 00:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I and a few other editors have substantially improved the article from the doctrinal point of view. However, the history sections are lacking and we haven't done much work there. I would like a review to give us a different perspective on what we should add, expand, remove, and/or rearrange. Thanks. Ltwin (talk) 04:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest that whenever you want a review for an article, you take it to peer review. There it will be listed along with other articles that people routinely stop by and review. Cheers. Mm40 (talk) 11:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I made some substantial edits to the page Adyar against the three problem areas - references, wikification, peacocking. I think I've kinda taken care of these. Can I get some feedback before I remove the tags? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
You have taken care of all three things. Good work! And you did the right thing to remove the wikification and peacock tags. I am a little hesitant as to the removal of the unreferenced tag. Perhaps it would have been better to change it to a refimprove tag. Debresser (talk) 23:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
New Entry for Semantic Designs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Clinternet/Semantic_Designs
I am trying to set up an entry for this company. I have started the page, but would appreciate suggestions on improving it so it is suitable for posting
-Clinternet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clinternet (talk • contribs) 15:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- User:Dawn Bard already gave a good summary of what the problem is with the article on your talk page. The article lacks proof of notability. The only reference returns a "page not found". To improve the article, fix the reference link and add more references of independent and reliable sources that show the relevance of this company. There are some minor issues as well: don't hyperlink in the the text section of the article. The history section should be expanded. bamse (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
NA'AMAT USA
I am requesting that NA'AMAT USA be included in the list of Women's Organizations and Jewish Women's Organizations.
NA'AMAT USA is part of the internation movement which supports the work of NA'AMAT Israel, Israel's largest women's movement. It provides social services for women, youth, children and families in Israel including Jewish, Arab, and Druse citizens of Israel.
Services include Israel's largest network of day care centers, technological high schools for at-risk youth, women's centers, legal services and much more. The web site of NA'AMAT USA is www.naamat.org
Sylvia Lewis, National Vice President NA'AMAT USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Syllewis1 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Cold distillation new page
Hi,
I'd like to add a page describing Cold distillation. I have drafted Cold distillation [1] as a user page. can i have some feedback on it before submitting to publish please?
Many thanks
Tom Jefferies —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomjefferies (talk • contribs) 15:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an article about a pair of Chopin's nocturnes for piano. The article includes excerpts, summarys, the significance of these nocturnes, as well as quite a few other things.
After I started the article, many people significantly expanded it. I believe it is quite comprehensive now.
I am wondering if the B rating is appropriate. Also, how can this article be prepared for GA Assessment. Any improvements.