User talk:Jeneral28: Difference between revisions
FisherQueen (talk | contribs) note |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Thee top three are the attack dogs of this so called informative site. Any single edit--especially on TV shows which has the least value of all--they will pounce on you, read the stupid, laughable and downright chidish wikipedia lawas ad if they are three Gods. [[User:Jeneral28|Jeneral28]] ([[User talk:Jeneral28#top|talk]]) 09:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thee top three are the attack dogs of this so called informative site. Any single edit--especially on TV shows which has the least value of all--they will pounce on you, read the stupid, laughable and downright chidish wikipedia lawas ad if they are three Gods. [[User:Jeneral28|Jeneral28]] ([[User talk:Jeneral28#top|talk]]) 09:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{#if:repeated abuse of multiple accounts|'''repeated abuse of multiple accounts'''|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 15:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)|[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 15:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->[[Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
|||
I apologize for my earlier one-week block; I didn't realize that you've been abusing multiple accounts before, and understand the rule. I've changed it to an indefinite block; any future accounts you create will also be blocked. If you would like to edit again, you should avoid using Wikipedia for one week per sockpuppet account, then request an unblock of this account (or your original account, if this isn't it) with a promise not to create additional accounts in the future. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 15:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:19, 29 May 2009
Image copyright problem with File:JMcCurdy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JMcCurdy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Soon to go on my profile page:
I do not like the following "editors"
User:Aoi--for pouncing on almost every single edit that I make with dictatorial like comments and butting into articles that he/she does not have a clue about
User:Frehley--for being extremely rude to me in his first message, for equally houding my articles like comrade User:Aoi and for being a pain when prescribing accurate information. And to you you conservative being, you are a M Cosgrove defender. Admit it yourself.
User:Amalthea for being as equally guarding extremely inaccurate information, for being a defender of hi/her chum Frehley--why only these three are bothering with on article--where re the other editors? You thre are my top most disliked people
User:Piano non troppo--for being so curt in his comments--little revision and it's a ban? Then for running to User:Aoi and giving me no such apologies since he/she made the mistake in the first place
Thee top three are the attack dogs of this so called informative site. Any single edit--especially on TV shows which has the least value of all--they will pounce on you, read the stupid, laughable and downright chidish wikipedia lawas ad if they are three Gods. Jeneral28 (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
