User talk:WikiLeon

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #124

Speak on it!

Home   Talk   Wikipedians   Userboxes   Ribbons   Awards   Guide   Tasks

Myspace Userbox

The reason am I contacting you is that what is the complete code for the myspace userbox version of "This user has a profile on myspace as _____" .

Hello, WikiLeon. You have new messages at Secondarywaltz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dictionary definitions are WP:SYNTH?

Hi,

Can you point me to the WP doc which says Dictionary definitions are WP:SYNTH? Thanks. Conrad940 (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - May 2009

I have three questions

I made an edit today--one edit--to the article Carrie Prejean and have not made an edit to the article in days, but yet another editor reversed my ONE edit and then reported me on the 3RR notice board. I find this to be a clear use of Wikipedia to win a debate about article content and direction. Prejean was called a series of negative things by Perez Hilton, most of the words are contemptuous and vile, such as the b-word and c-word. There are editors that believe that each and every one of Hilton's use of those words MUST be included in the article about Prejean. Now, I don't see the need to have an article about Prejean dominated by the words and comments of ONE individual (highly negative words at that) dominate the life story of Prejean. It is tantamount to having the words of Saddam Hussein concerning George W Bush dominate the Wikipedia article about Bush. It violates Wikipedia avowed goal of NPOV and it violates BLP. Now, I know that consensus in Wikipedia editing is one of the goals, but consensus does NOT override other valid Wikipedia ideals such as BLP. There can be a compromise made where the gist of Hilton's highly negative opinion is included in the article, but at the same time it does NOT dominate the life story of Prejean. Prejean is notable for many, many reasons, not just her public fight with Hilton. She is notable for being a successful model; she is notable for participating in Deal or No Deal; she is notable for being the current Miss California USA; and she is now notable for being a TV personality. My first question is: Can you at least review the article and see if the second, third, fourth, and fifth repetitions of the b-word and c-word violates BLP? I believe that it does. And my second question is: Is it appropriate to make a report on an editor for violating 3RR even though that editor has only made one edit? And my third question is: Is misusing 3RR to win a debate on the proper interpretation of BLP appropriate? I don't think so.--InaMaka (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

File:PCT_-_IHTP.ogg

I know, passing the buck and all but I've instead listed the file at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_May_18#PCT_-_IHTP.ogg. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Protection of Safety

Can this page be unprotected now? It's been protected for about 18 months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.62.101 (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

temple garment

I modified the statement regarding the temple garment in the article on the Church of Jesus Christ of LDS. Take a look. is that agreeable?--Cesevern (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2009 (UTC)