Jump to content

Talk:Songs from the Wood: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


I don't have the cover of ''Songs from the Wood'' at hand but I always had the impression that the picture on the cover, showing Ian Anderson in a forest scene, is actually not a photograph but a [[Photorealism|photorealistic]] painting. Maybe I was wrong, but if not it would be worth mention it in the article. --[[User:Mipani|Mipani]] ([[User talk:Mipani|talk]]) 15:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't have the cover of ''Songs from the Wood'' at hand but I always had the impression that the picture on the cover, showing Ian Anderson in a forest scene, is actually not a photograph but a [[Photorealism|photorealistic]] painting. Maybe I was wrong, but if not it would be worth mention it in the article. --[[User:Mipani|Mipani]] ([[User talk:Mipani|talk]]) 15:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

:Yes, I agree with the impression that the picture is not a photograph. But I don't know where to get information about it. I also thought that it could be a photograph which was overpainted! -- [[User:Tabasco da Gammla|Tabasco da Gammla]] ([[User talk:Tabasco da Gammla|talk]]) 20:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:58, 24 June 2009

WikiProject iconAlbums Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.


In the article it says they are folk rock, but in the little box on the right hand side, it says they are prog rock, as it says on the bottom. whats up with this?

This article reads like an advertisement. Calling their live performance "unbelievable" might be accurate to a fan (such as myself), but it's hardly a verifiable statement. This whole thing could use a more unbiased, less analytical rewrite.

Agreed. It reads like a review. I have no quarrel with Tull or with this CD/album, in fact I am a huge fan and have been for more than 25 years, but the tone of this article is not wikipedia-ish. -- Terry J. Gardner 19:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like it!

I like this article. I think that it is appropriately written by a fan of the band. And Jethro Tull's live show is "unbelievable"...I can attest to that! (Ceilidthbear 09:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC))

Front cover picture - in fact a photorealistic painting?

I don't have the cover of Songs from the Wood at hand but I always had the impression that the picture on the cover, showing Ian Anderson in a forest scene, is actually not a photograph but a photorealistic painting. Maybe I was wrong, but if not it would be worth mention it in the article. --Mipani (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with the impression that the picture is not a photograph. But I don't know where to get information about it. I also thought that it could be a photograph which was overpainted! -- Tabasco da Gammla (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]