User talk:68.50.128.120: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PhilKnight (talk | contribs) 7-day block |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You've been blocked again for [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]], or in other words, problematic conduct. If William M. Connolley is correct, and you're engaging in sockpuppetry, then you're probably just going to get blocked again when you return. However, if you're not, then I suggest you focus on article improvement after your block expires. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 17:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
You've been blocked again for [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]], or in other words, problematic conduct. If William M. Connolley is correct, and you're engaging in sockpuppetry, then you're probably just going to get blocked again when you return. However, if you're not, then I suggest you focus on article improvement after your block expires. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 17:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:[[User talk:PhilKnight]] -You've over-reacted. Just note at the exchange in the last 24 hours at the page of [[User talk:KeltieMartinFan]] |
|||
:[[Special:Contributions/68.50.128.120|68.50.128.120]] ([[User talk:68.50.128.120#top|talk]]) 17:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:08, 15 August 2009
You've been blocked again for disruptive editing, or in other words, problematic conduct. If William M. Connolley is correct, and you're engaging in sockpuppetry, then you're probably just going to get blocked again when you return. However, if you're not, then I suggest you focus on article improvement after your block expires. PhilKnight (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- User talk:PhilKnight -You've over-reacted. Just note at the exchange in the last 24 hours at the page of User talk:KeltieMartinFan