Jump to content

User talk:Vanished User 1004: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
an award
→‎Thanks: new section
Line 43: Line 43:
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your Vulcan like work ethic and your Vulcan like logic (which is correct but infuriates me :-) ). --[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 11:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your Vulcan like work ethic and your Vulcan like logic (which is correct but infuriates me :-) ). --[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 11:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Thanks ==

Thanks for your message. No worries. Even though we ended up in issues in the past, but I still appreciate your efforts. I will co-operate with you and will expect the same. Every issue has a solution :) ... Regards ....--[[Special:Contributions/99.51.223.161|99.51.223.161]] ([[User talk:99.51.223.161|talk]]) 07:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:35, 24 August 2009

Hello, and Welcome!

I have decided that posts here will generally be answered both here, and on the poster's talk page. I will generally include a copy of the post I am answering as well.
Please discuss article edits on the appropriate article talk pages, and be wp:CIVIL.
At my sole discretion, posts I feel don't meet these requirements will be either archived, if I value them, or simply deleted, if I do not.

If this displeases you, please feel free to post elsewhere. Please see wp:talk for additional guidance.

I spend a bit of time patrolling recent changes.

When I make a mistake, please note:

  • I am only a human, I promise I will make mistakes. I revert things that appear to be clear vandalism, or dubious and unsourced, or most aggressively, dubious and unsourced/weakly-sourced and Biographical. I think that Biographical articles are the greatest risk that Wikipedia faces.
  • When you find I have made a mistake, please undo my edit and say why in the edit description. If you are VERY kind, and there is a useful Wikipedia guideline or consensus, please link it. :)
  • I would mildly prefer that you not leave me a template message if I've made a bad edit.
  • If I have reverted your edit, whether vandalism, otherwise problematic, or mistakenly, please don't abuse me with vandalism here. It will be quickly reverted.
  • I am not here all the time. If you leave me a message and I don't respond quickly, please don't be offended. I will get back to you as soon as I can after I see your message.

Other things:

  • I am not an admin. I will never be an admin. I am too loud, too wrong too often, way too politically incorrect, and too unable to learn the "kagillion" WP rules. I am an editor. I will do my best to be a useful Wikipedia editor. That is all.
  • I am not going to look up your sources for you. If you add content and I flag it {{CN}}, or cut it to the talk page for possible inclusion, beating me up... because you did a quick SuperWombatSearchEngine9 query and found the source you should have included the 1st time... will only make me smile.
  • I make small edits. I put an edit summary on each one, almost without fail. Thus, if an article is badly wounded, I may make 100 edits to it to fix 100 spelling, grammar, structure, and sourcing errors. Please try to survive somehow. Screaming at me that I am editing too much will again only make me smile.
  • If someone posts on a talk page covering 23 points, I may answer with a 23 point response. This *absolutely enrages* some individuals. As a courtesy, I will attempt to remember their preferences, and not reply to their posts. For those times I forget, I apologize in advance, and I invite the reader to ignore my response: I will do my best.
  • In those rare cases where an editor cannot even bear to read a talk page where I post, if the article is one I don't care about, I won't post there any more. If it is, however, I again apologize in advance, and again I invite the reader to ignore my response.
One day, a wise man listened impassively as his critics berated and insulted him during a discussion.
After the end of the discussion, an observer asked him how it made him feel to be treated so.
The elder smiled for a moment, then said "It makes me very happy."
A student, who had been upset already, demanded "How can it make you happy to be treated so!?!?"
His teacher explained, still smiling, "Because, my impetuous young friend, I am not them."

Archive 1 - 2008 September - 2009 February 15 - any previous, see History, sorry
Archive 2 - 2009 February 15 - 2009 August 20

Please add new sections at the BOTTOM

- sinneed (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's About Time You Got One!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your Vulcan like work ethic and your Vulcan like logic (which is correct but infuriates me :-) ). --Sikh-History 11:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your message. No worries. Even though we ended up in issues in the past, but I still appreciate your efforts. I will co-operate with you and will expect the same. Every issue has a solution :) ... Regards ....--99.51.223.161 (talk) 07:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]