Talk:Nagarakretagama: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Can we write history without manipulation? |
Can we write history without manipulation? |
||
I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda. |
I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also [[Kidung Sunda]] article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda. |
||
Best regards, |
Best regards, |
Revision as of 04:51, 29 September 2009
A fact from Nagarakretagama appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Indonesia Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Manipulation of history
Dear users,
Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda.
Best regards, --Serayu 04:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation)