User talk:Kno CunninLynguists: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
TheJazzDalek (talk | contribs) Removing sourced content |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Removing sourced content == |
== Removing sourced content == |
||
Edited personal attacks and conjecture. [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 21:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Piece_of_Strange&diff=346939689&oldid=346938305 I don't need a committee to remove or add something]". Actually, you do. The content has a reference. You feel that it's not a reliable source—fine. But other people, me included, think it is, so we have to reach a [[WP:CON|consensus]]. Maybe if your participation on Wikipedia went beyond serving your own interests, you would know how things work here. Wikipedia does not exist to promote your group, nor does it exist to help keep your copyright infringement via unlicensed samples a secret from the publishing companies you're hiding from. Discuss your issues with the source's reliability on the article's talk page. Continuing to revert it because you don't like it could result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] for [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]]. [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 21:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:30, 28 February 2010
If you think it's an unreliable souce, explain why on the article's talk page. If the consensus is that the source is unreliable, it can be removed from the article. TheJazzDalek (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Removing sourced content
Edited personal attacks and conjecture. TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)