Talk:Star Star: Difference between revisions
Xenobot Mk V (talk | contribs) m Bot) Tagging for WP:SONGS: inherit class from other projects, (Plugin++) Songs→WikiProject Songs |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The section titled, "The song" reads like the ''worst'' kind of rock journalism. A slobbering, pandering ''review''. --[[Special:Contributions/63.25.96.13|63.25.96.13]] ([[User talk:63.25.96.13|talk]]) 17:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC) |
The section titled, "The song" reads like the ''worst'' kind of rock journalism. A slobbering, pandering ''review''. --[[Special:Contributions/63.25.96.13|63.25.96.13]] ([[User talk:63.25.96.13|talk]]) 17:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Wow. That's a very derogatory way of describing the song. Granted, this isn't for the faint of heart or for somebody looking for a good 'chill-out' tune, but it isn't as if he's got any room to critisize the Stones. I wonder if he would be able to play the song himself (doubt it). I, for one, really like that song; I think it shows how the Stones aren't restricted by the expectations of their record labels or their fans. The Stones play what they want to play, how they want to play it. I think that section of this article should be re-written from a non-biased standpoint. - Listener |
:Wow. That's a very derogatory way of describing the song. Granted, this isn't for the faint of heart or for somebody looking for a good 'chill-out' tune, but it isn't as if he's got any room to critisize the Stones. I wonder if he would be able to play the song himself (doubt it). I, for one, really like that song; I think it shows how the Stones aren't restricted by the expectations of their record labels or their fans. The Stones play what they want to play, how they want to play it. I think that section of this article should be re-written from a non-biased standpoint. - Listener |
||
Why would you read the lyrics to a song it's about the music. |
|||
Revision as of 19:12, 7 July 2010
 | The Rolling Stones Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Songs Start‑class  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:GHSCover.jpg
Image:GHSCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ghs.jpg
Image:Ghs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ghs.jpg
Image:Ghs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Yuck!
The section titled, "The song" reads like the worst kind of rock journalism. A slobbering, pandering review. --63.25.96.13 (talk) 17:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Wow. That's a very derogatory way of describing the song. Granted, this isn't for the faint of heart or for somebody looking for a good 'chill-out' tune, but it isn't as if he's got any room to critisize the Stones. I wonder if he would be able to play the song himself (doubt it). I, for one, really like that song; I think it shows how the Stones aren't restricted by the expectations of their record labels or their fans. The Stones play what they want to play, how they want to play it. I think that section of this article should be re-written from a non-biased standpoint. - Listener
Why would you read the lyrics to a song it's about the music.