Talk:Knight and Day: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:05, 21 August 2010

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Knight and Day article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: American Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Espionage Start‑class Low‑importance

	Knight and Day is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Kansas Start‑class Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plot Summarization

The plot needs to be resummarized. Unless you have already seen the film, the description of the film's opening makes no sense - and if you have seen the film you probably would not have an interest in reading about it here... Please explain the missing, unexplained assumptions that the film is based on (i.e. he's a spy, an agent, a terrorist, whatever he is...) so those of us that haven't seen the film can understand what it is about... Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot has been updated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spin2Win (talk • contribs) 02:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources

Let use try to not do this, adding info that is essentially violating WP:NOR from a primary source, and poor sources "mojo" and "mojo korea" for main body text other than purely statistical or numeric info. We should use secondary WP:RS sources. -- Cirt (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cirt Negative Agenda

To user "Cirt,"

I have reviewed the history of this page and your very extensive edits. You are clearly pushing a profoundly negative agenda not remotely rooted in balanced reality. Your justification for doing so is often arbitrary, hypocritical, thinly veiled behind a manipulative use of Wikipedia policy and without merit beyond your transparent agenda to do harm to Tom Cruise and/or FOX and/or Knight and Day. If you continue to vandalize this page I will bring this matter to the attention of the highest review possible at Wikipedia.

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Let use try to not do [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Knight_and_Day&diff=378777107&oldid=378774576 this], adding info that is essentially violating [[WP:NOR]] from a primary source, and poor sources "mojo" and "mojo korea" for main body text other than purely statistical or numeric info. We should use ''secondary'' [[WP:RS]] sources.  -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
+== Cirt Negative Agenda ==
+To user "Cirt,"
+I have reviewed the history of this page and your very extensive edits. You are clearly pushing a profoundly negative agenda not remotely rooted in balanced reality. Your justification for doing so is often arbitrary, hypocritical, thinly veiled behind a manipulative use of Wikipedia policy and without merit beyond your transparent agenda to do harm to Tom Cruise and/or FOX and/or Knight and Day. If you continue to vandalize this page I will bring this matter to the attention of the highest review possible at Wikipedia.