User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:07, 13 September 2010

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. Misplaced threads can get lost and go unnoticed, especially if I'm in a busy or similar status.

If you are a registered user, I will usually reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with. Likewise, I may also reply here and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page for the sake of threading.

If you are an unregistered user, I will reply on this page and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your IP address' User talk page.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

Westville High School (a FYI)

Hi, I just wanted you to know that that vandal you reverted is actually a long term vandal named User:The South Boat Diet of Worms or his recent name, User:Slavemodsquad. He focuses on the Illinois cities, Danville and Westville. --Bsa dow ski1 02:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

icarly crossover

regarding this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICarly&curid=10292532&diff=383132887&oldid=383120997. so you know it is a 3 parter, since it is going take two weeks to be filed.

one reguar episodes take one week to film for the show two parter one hr movie's take 2 weeks two film. iStart a fan war is a two parter and it took two weeks to film. so the crossover will be a 3 parter 90 minute episode since it is going to take 3 weeks to filmSaylaveer (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you usually edit within this topic.

I was wondering if you would like to say your thoughts on a proposal on the talk page of Total Drama (series)? Nilocla ^{♈ ☮} 22:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intuition pump

I was hoping you could help me understand how to improve this article.

It's not very long, but since the topic is a term coined by a specific person, it includes links to articles on two of his books, and a quote from each. It also has a direct citation for the term.

Now, we could add citations for the books, but they already have full articles, so I'm not sure how that will help much. What am I missing? How would you improve this article so that you'd be happy with the tag's removal? Dylan Flaherty (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage being tagged

Looks like a sock may be at work. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tau Phi Sigma

Hello,

This article was recreated again after your recent deletion. I suspect it may still be a copyvio, but the URL that it was previously copied from is now mysteriously no longer on the web server :) Is there any chance you could look at the deleted version and compare it to the current article? I believe it's still a copyvio if it's basically identical, even if the original page has been taken down.

(Prefer replies here, thanks!)

Thparkth (talk) 03:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not identical. See my comments on the talk page, which include the updated URL for the about page. —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the swift response. I agree with all your comments. Thparkth (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lady gaga

you want a source ? look at the video from her concert , behind gaga , 13 million albums http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwZcbPRyma4 now please stop change it !!!!! --Bar17 (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Bar17, YouTube is generally not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. The Daily News, however, is. –Chase (talk) 23:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

her label compeny gave it to her you cant see ??? 13 million albums , its from the 20.8.10 3 weeks ago her label know exactly how many gaga sold and they gave it to her !!!!! you try to tell me that her label dont know how many she sold and a lame news paper know ??? you source is an old source , i brought a new and reliable source her label compeny --Bar17 (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]