Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 21d) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria/Archive 2. |
→Preston: new section |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
I have nominated [[Rivington]] at GAN as I think it meets the Good Article criteria. and the project doesn't have many GAs particularly the settlements.--[[User:J3Mrs|J3Mrs]] ([[User talk:J3Mrs|talk]]) 09:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
I have nominated [[Rivington]] at GAN as I think it meets the Good Article criteria. and the project doesn't have many GAs particularly the settlements.--[[User:J3Mrs|J3Mrs]] ([[User talk:J3Mrs|talk]]) 09:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Preston == |
|||
Views are invited at [[Talk:Preston]] regarding a shuffle of some material and titles relating to [[WP:UKDISTRICTS]]. <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">[[User:Jza84|<b>Jza84</b>]] | [[User_talk: Jza84|<font style="color:#000000;background:#D3D3D3;"> Talk </font>]] </span></small> 21:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:06, 7 October 2010
 | Lancashire and Cumbria NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
| WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria Talk Page Welcome to the Talk Page of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria. Please remember to remain civil and to treat all users with respect. Please only use this page to discuss the project. |  |
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Articles tagged for clean up
For anyone who is interested in helping clean up articles there is now a link on the project page here that links to a bot generated page of articles tagged with various cleanup needs. NtheP (talk) 16:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
The Cheshire portal has been nominated for Featured Portal status. To join the discussion, visit Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Cheshire. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Lancashire and Cumbria articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Lancashire and Cumbria articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Milburn
I've just made a major update to the Milburn, Cumbria article. I'm new to Wikipedia and the editor who's been helping has been out of contact for a while so I'd appreciate comments Crossview (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Rivington at GAN
I have nominated Rivington at GAN as I think it meets the Good Article criteria. and the project doesn't have many GAs particularly the settlements.--J3Mrs (talk) 09:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Preston
Views are invited at Talk:Preston regarding a shuffle of some material and titles relating to WP:UKDISTRICTS. --Jza84 | Talk 21:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC)