Talk:Boy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m clean up, test, replaced: {talkheader → {Talk header using AWB (6786) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
To show the physical appearance of boys, one picture should do, I don't see the added value to a encyclopedia of showing endless amounts of nude boys strolling around. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/130.92.64.4|130.92.64.4]] ([[User talk:130.92.64.4|talk]]) 18:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
To show the physical appearance of boys, one picture should do, I don't see the added value to a encyclopedia of showing endless amounts of nude boys strolling around. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/130.92.64.4|130.92.64.4]] ([[User talk:130.92.64.4|talk]]) 18:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
lol pedophiles... |
|||
==REMOVE NUDE GALLERY== |
==REMOVE NUDE GALLERY== |
||
Revision as of 20:01, 24 October 2010
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
nude gallery removed
To show the physical appearance of boys, one picture should do, I don't see the added value to a encyclopedia of showing endless amounts of nude boys strolling around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.92.64.4 (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
lol pedophiles...
REMOVE NUDE GALLERY
It add's no value to the article. Please give me the consensus to remove it. keeping it there is has no point to it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarsfieldusmc (talk • contribs) 00:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)