Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Pacific Association of Bible Colleges: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Keep''' the association exists, it is international in scope with some notable members, the list can be put on the list of Bible Colleges if desired, but the Association at least deserves a stub. -- [[User:Paul foord|Paul foord]] 05:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' the association exists, it is international in scope with some notable members, the list can be put on the list of Bible Colleges if desired, but the Association at least deserves a stub. -- [[User:Paul foord|Paul foord]] 05:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Notable association which has been in existence since 1969. [[User:Cnwb|Cnwb]] 06:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Notable association which has been in existence since 1969. [[User:Cnwb|Cnwb]] 06:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per all of the above [[User:80.177.152.156|80.177.152.156]] 22:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per all of the above [[User:Jcuk|Jcuk]] 22:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:34, 18 February 2006

This is a list of certain schools, which WP:Is Not. There is already a list of Bible colleges so this is a fork to promote certain Australian bible schools. If this group of schools is notable it isn't demonstrated. The group's webpage fails to explain notability [1], which is also just a list of "independent" schools. Arbustoo 22:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we keep this, we will slide down a slippery slope and end up with Tri-state Association of Bible Colleges and Five Corners Free Will Reformed Association of Bible Colleges and Buddhislamic Association of Christian Synagogues of Vishnu Bible Colleges --Ruby 01:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Other than a date, how is it more than a list? Arbustoo 01:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you, Ruby saying that these associations exist? This organisation does exist! Paul foord 05:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think his point was we don't know what educational clout/recognition this "association" has or why it is Wikipedia worthy. Arbustoo 20:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]