Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemerle: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
NCdy (talk | contribs)
nCdy comment
Line 10: Line 10:


More than 100 questions in StackOverflow where Nemerle is quoted. --[[User:Sergey shandar|Sergey Shandar]] ([[User talk:Sergey shandar|talk]]) 06:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
More than 100 questions in StackOverflow where Nemerle is quoted. --[[User:Sergey shandar|Sergey Shandar]] ([[User talk:Sergey shandar|talk]]) 06:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
<hr />
What the hell are you thinking about ? Nemerle is non-notable ? Bullshit ! Man, just check the language http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4561524/f-vs-c-vs-nemerle check the project activity. I say : "Don't do it !" You has absolutely no idea about Nemerle. You ! totalitarian programmer, Take your dirty hands off the project. I like Nemerle and sure you can't believe me. So here are the links you did not found :
== Some links ==
<ol>
<li> [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/events/sscli2005/pacholski-moskal.pdf Nemerle MS Research]
<li> [http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/79947/p29-syme.pdf Extensible Pattern Matching]
<li> [http://www.mono-project.com/Languages Mono languages]
<li> [http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=names&keywords=nemerle Ubuntu package]
<li> [http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/nemerle Debian package]
<li> [http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-lang/nemerle Gentoo ebuild]
</ol>
If you need more you can search for more. And my point is :
<ul>
<li>How the hell you can tell about programming languages notability if you really just a student, Hell how much experience about languages you can have to desire what languages should be here ? </li>
<li>So you say it's interesting only for developers and I answer. Hell, yes ! Sure programming languages is interesting for developers ? Maybe for painters ? or for 'housewifes' ? Not man. Programming languages is for programmers. </li>
<li>You say "Covering these languages on Wikipedia makes it harder to find *interesting* programming languages". So what is *interesting* programming languages for you ? Basic ? Pascal ? Oh god ! Nemerle makes it harder to find Basic for you... Poor boy , I am sorry for you !</li>
</ul>
--[[User:nCdy|nCdy]] ([[User talk:nCdy|talk]]) 12:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
<br />

Revision as of 10:03, 8 February 2011

Nemerle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable programming language. The only hits on Google for this language aside from the main website are blogs discussing syntax and a question or two on StackOverflow. Notability tag for nearly 2 years. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As .NET developer I would say that it's the most promising open-source language for .NET. How could it be non-notable? And it is not dead projects, since a lot of people (about 30 commiters) are supporting the project. http://code.google.com/p/nemerle/ Please, call other .NET languages that are not from Microsoft and have bigger impact on .NET community than Nemerle. --Sergey Shandar (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More than 100 questions in StackOverflow where Nemerle is quoted. --Sergey Shandar (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


What the hell are you thinking about ? Nemerle is non-notable ? Bullshit ! Man, just check the language http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4561524/f-vs-c-vs-nemerle check the project activity. I say : "Don't do it !" You has absolutely no idea about Nemerle. You ! totalitarian programmer, Take your dirty hands off the project. I like Nemerle and sure you can't believe me. So here are the links you did not found :

  1. Nemerle MS Research
  2. Extensible Pattern Matching
  3. Mono languages
  4. Ubuntu package
  5. Debian package
  6. Gentoo ebuild

If you need more you can search for more. And my point is :

  • How the hell you can tell about programming languages notability if you really just a student, Hell how much experience about languages you can have to desire what languages should be here ?
  • So you say it's interesting only for developers and I answer. Hell, yes ! Sure programming languages is interesting for developers ? Maybe for painters ? or for 'housewifes' ? Not man. Programming languages is for programmers.
  • You say "Covering these languages on Wikipedia makes it harder to find *interesting* programming languages". So what is *interesting* programming languages for you ? Basic ? Pascal ? Oh god ! Nemerle makes it harder to find Basic for you... Poor boy , I am sorry for you !

--nCdy (talk) 12:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]