Jump to content

Talk:72 (number): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:
nevermind [[User:72.66.249.231|72.66.249.231]] 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
nevermind [[User:72.66.249.231|72.66.249.231]] 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


== 72 is not a hily composite number ==
== 72 is not a highly composite number ==


72 is not a highly composite number:
72 is not a highly composite number:

Revision as of 04:06, 27 March 2011

WikiProject iconNumbers Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconKabbalah (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconJudaism Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

nevermind 72.66.249.231 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

72 is not a highly composite number

72 is not a highly composite number: See the article on highly composite number, which lists the first dozen highly composite numbers and 72 is not in this list.

Note that "highly composite number" is NOT some phrase to be used on a whim, but rather there is a technical definition of this concept. 98.67.171.23 (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]