User talk:Jeff G.: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2011/April. |
help thank you |
||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
::I have removed the second PROD tag from [[Calostemma purpureum]]. [[WP:PROD]] states ''If any person objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{tl|proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed.''. The first PROD (along with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pingu.dbl96&diff=prev&oldid=423122197 this] warning — what "vandalism"?) was also inappropriate in my opinion — species are inherently notable, and "insufficient references" not a valid reason for deletion. [[User:Suffusion of Yellow|Suffusion of Yellow]] ([[User talk:Suffusion of Yellow|talk]]) 06:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
::I have removed the second PROD tag from [[Calostemma purpureum]]. [[WP:PROD]] states ''If any person objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{tl|proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed.''. The first PROD (along with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pingu.dbl96&diff=prev&oldid=423122197 this] warning — what "vandalism"?) was also inappropriate in my opinion — species are inherently notable, and "insufficient references" not a valid reason for deletion. [[User:Suffusion of Yellow|Suffusion of Yellow]] ([[User talk:Suffusion of Yellow|talk]]) 06:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::I am sincerely disappointed in your actions in restoring a validly removed PROD tag -- as an experienced editor, you should know better. I have also noted, over time, your propensity to "go for the throat" when warning other editors, as you did in the situation referenced above (not to mention the issue of [[WP:DTR|templating established editors]]). The hyper-reactionism is, perhaps, a sign that it is time for you to step back and consider taking a [[WP:WIKIBREAK|break]]. [[User:Taroaldo|Taroaldo]] ([[User talk:Taroaldo|talk]]) 07:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
:::I am sincerely disappointed in your actions in restoring a validly removed PROD tag -- as an experienced editor, you should know better. I have also noted, over time, your propensity to "go for the throat" when warning other editors, as you did in the situation referenced above (not to mention the issue of [[WP:DTR|templating established editors]]). The hyper-reactionism is, perhaps, a sign that it is time for you to step back and consider taking a [[WP:WIKIBREAK|break]]. [[User:Taroaldo|Taroaldo]] ([[User talk:Taroaldo|talk]]) 07:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Can you review == |
|||
[[Rabbi Pinto]] Information seems to be getting ignored. |
|||
2 major recent features are longest stories ever written on Rabbi Pinto. |
|||
Rabbi's right hand man who owns property with the rabbis wife and has power of attorney for Pinto - rabbi’s translator, gatekeeper and conduit to the outside world in America is a longtime pornographer. The Rabbi is revered in the United States and Israel for his financial advice, especially in real estate, Suky’s own real estate business has faced a string of lawsuits, foreclosures and legal judgments. And while Pinto is an ultra-Orthodox rabbi, his adviser’s involvement in the pornography industry would seem to run counter to the tenets of modesty espoused by traditional Judaism. http://forward.com/articles/136819/#ixzz1J47HjPxA |
|||
Additionally no mention of $60 Million organization and 3 employees. Is noteable. Pls assist, http://www.forward.com/articles/136250/ 65.112.21.194 (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:04, 9 April 2011
Top Links
Thanks in advance to anyone who reverts vandalism in my userspace, it'd get a little tedious if I thanked everyone on their talk page every time. Please click here to see and sign my Guestbook. Please click here to send me a message. |
Page types | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User pages | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
User page histories | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
User talk pages | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
User talk page histories | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Your Preferences ("Number of edits" includes deleted edits) | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Your Watchlists | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
View and Edit Your Watchlists | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Contributions | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Contributions & Edits (Luxo's Global user contributions tool; includes deleted edits) | all | all | all | all | all | all |
Gallery (Duesentrieb's WikiSense Gallery DuesenTool script) | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Project Matrices | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
History of Project Matrices | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Edit Project Matrices | Commons | en | de | m | b | simple |
Page last updated 07:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #78 |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Welcome to my user talk page!
Current Monthly Archive (redlinked the first week Past and near future
|
Maintenance
Talkback notices
Please place your talkback notices below this line in this section (no subsection necessary). I plan to delete them when I have read them. Thank you.
Other correspondence
"Personal attacks"
I didn't "attack" anyone. I simply vented my frustration at the other user hounding me on my talk page and talking to me like I'm stupid. You can see it on my page. 208.65.20.140 (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Explaining to you is neither harassment nor hounding. Dan56 is right. — Jeff G. ツ 02:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- He wasn't right to label what I did as unconstructive, I was only helping. And he did seem to go after me for no apparent reason. He harassed me like I was ruining the article or something, which clearly I was not. 208.65.20.140 (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I also didn't attack him. 208.65.20.140 (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- You called what he was doing "harassing". What you were doing was removing cited information and replacing it with information cited in the wrong place, both of which reduced the quality of the article. — Jeff G. ツ 03:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I also didn't attack him. 208.65.20.140 (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- He wasn't right to label what I did as unconstructive, I was only helping. And he did seem to go after me for no apparent reason. He harassed me like I was ruining the article or something, which clearly I was not. 208.65.20.140 (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello
I believe adding Autius to being born 1996, Feburary 5th was a constructive edit, as the Black Metal Musician was born then —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.152.216 (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Please stop propsing the 2 articles Chloris truncata and Calostemma purpureum for deletion. I have now referenced them, i think you should look at the articles again before continuing your foolish process of trying to remove perfectly valuable information from the hands of the world.
Thankyou
Pingu.dbl96 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pingu.dbl96 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Those alleged references are insufficiently precise to verify - we need verifiable reliable sources. See also {{cite book}}. — Jeff G. ツ 03:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed the second PROD tag from Calostemma purpureum. WP:PROD states If any person objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed.. The first PROD (along with this warning — what "vandalism"?) was also inappropriate in my opinion — species are inherently notable, and "insufficient references" not a valid reason for deletion. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I am sincerely disappointed in your actions in restoring a validly removed PROD tag -- as an experienced editor, you should know better. I have also noted, over time, your propensity to "go for the throat" when warning other editors, as you did in the situation referenced above (not to mention the issue of templating established editors). The hyper-reactionism is, perhaps, a sign that it is time for you to step back and consider taking a break. Taroaldo (talk) 07:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed the second PROD tag from Calostemma purpureum. WP:PROD states If any person objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed.. The first PROD (along with this warning — what "vandalism"?) was also inappropriate in my opinion — species are inherently notable, and "insufficient references" not a valid reason for deletion. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Can you review
Rabbi Pinto Information seems to be getting ignored. 2 major recent features are longest stories ever written on Rabbi Pinto.
Rabbi's right hand man who owns property with the rabbis wife and has power of attorney for Pinto - rabbi’s translator, gatekeeper and conduit to the outside world in America is a longtime pornographer. The Rabbi is revered in the United States and Israel for his financial advice, especially in real estate, Suky’s own real estate business has faced a string of lawsuits, foreclosures and legal judgments. And while Pinto is an ultra-Orthodox rabbi, his adviser’s involvement in the pornography industry would seem to run counter to the tenets of modesty espoused by traditional Judaism. http://forward.com/articles/136819/#ixzz1J47HjPxA
Additionally no mention of $60 Million organization and 3 employees. Is noteable. Pls assist, http://www.forward.com/articles/136250/ 65.112.21.194 (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2011 (UTC)