Jump to content

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m See also: alphabetise
Dodoïste (talk | contribs)
Resolution: update minimum resolution to 1024x768, however one day we will have to remove this section
Line 69: Line 69:
=== Resolution ===
=== Resolution ===


Wikipedia articles should be accessible to readers using devices with small screens, or to readers using monitors with a low resolution. The lowest resolution that it is considered possible to support without adversely affecting other users is 800x600; all articles should look acceptable at this resolution without excessive horizontal scrolling. This is sometimes an issue in articles with multiple images on both sides of the screen; although lower resolutions will tend to stretch paragraphs vertically, moving images apart in that direction, be careful not to add images or other floating content on both sides of the screen simultaneously. Large tables and images can also create problems; sometimes horizontal scrolling is unavoidable, but consider restructuring wide tables to extend vertically rather than horizontally.
Wikipedia articles should be accessible to readers using devices with small screens, or to readers using monitors with a low resolution. The lowest resolution that it is considered possible to support without adversely affecting other users is 1024x768; all articles should look acceptable at this resolution without excessive horizontal scrolling. This is sometimes an issue in articles with multiple images on both sides of the screen; although lower resolutions will tend to stretch paragraphs vertically, moving images apart in that direction, be careful not to add images or other floating content on both sides of the screen simultaneously. Large tables and images can also create problems; sometimes horizontal scrolling is unavoidable, but consider restructuring wide tables to extend vertically rather than horizontally.


== Text ==
== Text ==

Revision as of 16:37, 26 April 2011

Web accessibility is the goal of making web pages easier to navigate and read. While this is primarily intended to assist those with disabilities, it can be helpful to all readers. Articles adhering to the following guidelines are easier to read and edit by those Wikipedians with and without disabilities.

Article structure

Lead section

As explained in detail at Wikipedia:Lead section#Elements of the lead, the lead section may contain optional elements presented in the following order: disambiguation links (dablinks), maintenance tags, infoboxes, images, navigational boxes (navigational templates), introductory text, and table of contents, moving to the heading of the first section.

Headings

Headings should be descriptive and in a consistent order (See also—References—Further reading—External links).

Headings should be nested sequentially, starting with level 2 (==), then level 3 (===) and so on (level 1 is not used, as this is the auto-generated page title), neither using random heading levels (e.g. selected for emphasis, which is not the purpose of headings), nor skipping parts of the sequence.

Heading use (and misuse) examples
Correct Random/chaotic Skipping levels

[Article lead here]
==Section== [level 2]
===Sub-section=== [3]
==Section== [2]
===Sub-section=== [3]
====Sub-sub-section==== [4]
==Section== [2]

[Article lead here]
====Section?==== [4]
===Section?=== [3]
==Section?== [2]
==Section?== [2]
====Section?==== [4]
===Section?=== [2]

[Article lead here]
[Level-2 section missing here]
===Section?=== [3]
==Section== [2]
[Level-3 sub-section missing here]
====Sub-section?==== [4]
==Section== [2]

Section structure

As explained above for the lead section, each section should have a specific structure:

<!-- CORRECT CODE -->
== Foo bars ==
{{main|Foo bar}}
{{cleanup-section}}

[[Image:...|Typical Foo bar]]

A foo bar ...

Note also that the image should be inside the section it belongs to (after the header and after any links to other articles), and not just before the header for similar reasons.

Resolution

Wikipedia articles should be accessible to readers using devices with small screens, or to readers using monitors with a low resolution. The lowest resolution that it is considered possible to support without adversely affecting other users is 1024x768; all articles should look acceptable at this resolution without excessive horizontal scrolling. This is sometimes an issue in articles with multiple images on both sides of the screen; although lower resolutions will tend to stretch paragraphs vertically, moving images apart in that direction, be careful not to add images or other floating content on both sides of the screen simultaneously. Large tables and images can also create problems; sometimes horizontal scrolling is unavoidable, but consider restructuring wide tables to extend vertically rather than horizontally.

Text

  1. In articles, do not use strikethrough to remove objectionable text. Either comment it out with "<!--" and "-->" or remove it entirely. By default, most screen readers do not indicate presentational text attributes (bold, italic, underline) or even semantic text attributes (emphasis, importance, text deletion), so struck-out text is read normally along with any other text. (Editors who participate in Wikipedia policy and deletion debates are advised to turn on the sounding of text attributes when doing so, as struck text is very common in Wikipedia-internal discussions.)
  2. Screen readers without Unicode support will read a character outside Latin-1 as a question mark, and even in the latest version of JAWS, the most popular screen reader, Unicode characters are very difficult to read.
    1. Provide a transliteration for all text in a non-Latin writing system where the non-Latin character is important in the original context such as names, places, things etc.
    2. Do not use unpronounceable symbols such as ♥ (a heart symbol); use images with alt text instead.[1]
    3. Symbols that cause problems for screen readers may already have templates created to produce an image and alt text. An example is {{}}; see Category:Image insertion templates for more.
  3. Do not use techniques that require interaction to provide information, such as tooltips or any other "hover" text. Abbreviations are exempt from these requirements, so the {{abbr}} template may be used to indicate the long form of a word.
  4. When editing, never break up a line unless absolutely necessary, as the easiest way to edit with a screen reader is to navigate line by line.
  1. Create good link descriptions, especially for external links (avoid "click here!", "this").[2][3]
  2. Do not use Unicode characters as icons; use an icon with alt text instead. For example, a character like "→" can not be reproduced into useful text by a screen reader, and will usually be read as a question mark.

Color

Template:Otheruses-section

Two screenshots of the same highly textual user interface. The top one uses red, green, and blue; the bottom one uses nearly the same color for red and green, so that the red text becomes nearly invisible in its green background.
A pair of screenshots showing the effects of red/green colorblindness on legibility

Colors are most commonly found in Wikipedia articles within templates and tables. To view the colors available, see List of colors. For technical assistance on how colors are used, see Help:Using colours.

Articles that use color should keep accessibility in mind, as follows:

  • Ensure that color is not the only way used to convey important information. Especially, do not use colored text unless its status is also indicated using another method such as an accessible symbol matched to a legend, or footnote labels. Otherwise, blind users or readers accessing Wikipedia through a printout or device without a color screen will not receive that information.
  • Some readers of Wikipedia are partially or fully color blind. Ensure that the color combinations used in Wikipedia (infoboxes, navigational boxes, graphs, etc.) have an adequate contrast. Use a color scheme generator to select the colors, and tools for simulating color blind vision (colorfilter.wickline.org or vischeck.com) to check the result.
  • Be aware of the contrast of both plain text and the red/blue/purple link text with the background and avoid clashes where possible (such as blue writing on a red background).
  • If an article overuses colors, an alternative to correcting it is to add a tag such as ({{Overcolored}}/{{Overcoloured}}) to the top of the article to draw help from other editors in correcting the problem:

Block elements

Lists

Do not separate items by leaving blank lines between them, even when using unordered or definition lists. If list items are separated by more than one line break, the HTML list tags will be ended, which makes it difficult to read the list with screen readers. For example:

* One is a good number.
* Two is a better number.

* Three is the best number in the world.

* But the number four should not be mentioned at all costs.

will be read by a screen reader as: "List of 2 items: (bullet) One is a good number, (bullet) Two is a better number, list end. List of 1 items: (bullet) Three is the best number in the world, list end. List of 1 items: (bullet) But the number four should not be mentioned at all costs, list end." Improper formatting can more than triple the length of time it takes to read the list.

Horizontal lists

For lists running across the page, the template {{flatlist}} and its partner {{endflatlist}} are available, to improve accessibility and semantic meaningfulness by marking up what is clearly a list, as such, rather than characters which are read out (e.g. "one dot two dot three dot...") by the kind of assistive software used by, for example, people who are blind. Alternatively, in templates and the like, such lists may be styled with the class "horizontal".

Tables

Screen readers and other web browsing tools make use of specific table tags to help users navigate the data contained within them.

Use the correct wikitable pipe syntax to take advantage of all the features available. See meta:Help:Tables for more information on the special syntax used for tables. Do not solely use formatting, either from CSS or hardcoded styles, to create semantic meaning (eg, changing background colour).

The technique of creating a multi-line infobox using matching embedded HTML <br /> tags in adjacent cells creates a visual row not reflected in the HTML table structure. This is a problem for users of screen readers which read tables cell by cell, html row by html row, not visual row by visual row. WikiProject Accessibility/Infobox accessibility is addressing this problem.

Data tables

  • Priority: high (A accessibility level)
  • Difficulty: easy (blend in nicely with editorial habits)
{| 
|+ [caption text]
|-
! scope="col" | [column header 1]
! scope="col" | [column header 2]
! scope="col" | [column header 3]
|-
! scope="row" | [row header 1]
| [normal cell 1,2] || [normal cell 1,3]
|-
! scope="row" | [row header 2]
| [normal cell 2,2] || [normal cell 2,3]
...
|}
Caption ( |+ )
A caption is a table's title, describing its nature.[WCAG-TECH 1]
Row & column headers ( ! )
Like the caption, these help present the information in a logical structure to visitors.[WCAG-TECH 2] The headers help screen readers render header information about data cells. For example, header information is spoken prior to the cell data, or header information is provided on request.[4]
Scope of headers ( ! scope="col" | and ! scope="row" | )
This clearly identifies headers as either row headers or column headers. Headers can now be associated to corresponding cells.[WCAG-TECH 3]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (accessibility)/Data tables tutorial provides detailed requirements about:

  1. Correct table captions
  2. Correct headers structure
  3. Images and color
  4. Avoiding nested tables

Layout tables

Some navboxes, series templates, and infoboxes are made using tables.

Avoid using tables for layout purposes only. The best option is to use HTML's <div> blocks and style attributes because they provide flexibility. For example, see {{Navbox}}.

For simple layouts tables can be an option. Especially if the only point of the table is to get a floating effect, then align="right" etc. will work with some browsers not supporting CSS at all. This is in fact a verbose approximation of <div> plus CSS, and not the design sin known as (nested) "table layout".

However, to avoid accessibility barriers, when using tables for layout purposes do not use any caption, row, or column headers, and also no summary attribute. These structural table elements should be used only for data tables. Do not use structural elements for presentation purposes, use style sheets. For Wiki table markup this means to avoid "!" (= <th> in XHTML) in such cases:

{| class="toccolours" width="94%"
| align="center" bgcolor="#ccccff" | '''Title'''
|-
| [normal cell] || [normal cell]
|-
| [normal cell] || [normal cell]
|}

For example, see {{Navbox}}

Other languages

Non-English words or phrases should be encased in {{lang}}, which uses ISO639 language codes, thus:

{{lang|fr|Assemblée nationale}}

which renders as

Assemblée nationale.

Rationale: {{lang}} enables speech synthesizers to pronounce the text in the correct language.[5] It has many other uses; see Template:Lang/doc#Rationale for a comprehensive list of benefits.

Images

  1. Images should include an alt attribute, even an empty one, that acts as a substitute for the image for blind readers, search-spiders, and other non-visual users. If additional alt text is added it should be succinct, or should refer the reader to the caption or adjacent text: see WP:ALT for more information.
  2. Images should contain a caption, either using the built in image syntax or a secondary line of text. The caption should concisely describe the meaning of the image, the essential information it is trying to convey.
  3. Where possible, any charts or diagrams should have a text equivalent, or should be well-described so that users who are unable to see the image can gain some understanding of the concept.
  4. Detailed image descriptions, where not appropriate for an article, should be placed on the image description page, with a note saying that activating the image link will lead to a more detailed description.
  5. Images should be inside the section they belong to (after the heading and after any links to other articles), and not in the heading nor at the end of the previous section, otherwise screen readers would read the image (and its textual alternative) in a different section. See Wikipedia:Picture tutorial for more information.
  6. This guideline includes alt text for LaTeX-formatted equations in <math> mode.

Videos and animations

In order to be accessible, an animation (GIF – Graphics Interchange Format) should either:

  • not exceed a duration of five seconds (which results in making it a purely decorative element),[6] or
  • be equipped with control functions (stop, pause, play).[7]

In short, most animated GIFs should be converted to video (to learn how, see the tutorial converting animated GIFs to Theora OGG).

Although these are not yet supported by MediaWiki as of August 2010,[8] a video also should have subtitles and a text version (alt-text) of its content.[9][10] A good way to satisfy these needs is to make sure that the information in the video is also present in the prose text of the article.

Styles and markup options

Best practice: Use Wikimarkup and CSS in preference to alternatives

In general, articles should use wikimarkup in preference to the limited set of allowed HTML elements. In particular, do not use the HTML style tags <i> and <b> to format text; it is preferable to use Wiki markup '' or ''', or logical style tags. Of course there are natural exceptions: it may be beneficial to use <u></u> tags to indicate something like an example of an unclickable link. The <font> tag should also be avoided in article text; use logical style tags like <em>, <code>, or <strong> to emphasise semantic differences. Use <small> and <big> semantic tags to change font size, rather than setting it explicitly with the font-size= style attribute.

In general, styles for tables and other block-level elements should be set using CSS classes, not with inline style attributes. This is because the site-wide CSS is more carefully tested to ensure compatibility with a wide range of browsers; it also creates a greater degree of professionalism by ensuring a consistent appearance between articles. Deviations from standard conventions are acceptable where they create a semantic distinction (for instance, the infoboxes and navigational templates relating to The Simpsons use a yellow colour-scheme instead of the customary mauve, to tie in with the dominant colour in the series) but should not be used gratuitously.

Users with limited CSS/JavaScript support

Wikipedia articles should be accessible to readers using browsers and devices which have limited or no support for JavaScript or Cascading Style Sheets. At the same time, it is recognised that it is impossible to provide the same quality of appearance to such users without unnecessarily avoiding features that would benefit users with more capable browsers. As such, features which would cause content to be hidden or corrupted when CSS and/or JavaScript is unavailable must not be used. This includes techniques such as the hiddenStructure method for hiding table content — which produces incomprehensible output without CSS — and some implementations of the NavFrame collapsing code — which can make content inaccessible without JavaScript support. However, consideration for users without CSS or JavaScript should extend mainly to making sure that their reading experience is possible; it is recognised that it will inevitably be inferior.

To accommodate these considerations, test any potentially disruptive changes with JavaScript and/or CSS disabled. In Firefox, this can be done easily with the Web Developer extension; JavaScript can be disabled in IE in the 'Options' screen. Be particularly careful with inline CSS effects, which are not supported by several browsers, media, and XHTML versions.

See also

References

Specific

  1. ^ "F26: Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.3 due to using a graphical symbol alone to convey information". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  2. ^ "G91: Providing link text that describes the purpose of a link". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  3. ^ "F84: Failure of Success Criterion 2.4.9 due to using a non-specific link such as "click here" or "more" without a mechanism to change the link text to specific text". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  4. ^ "Table cells: The TH and TD elements". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  5. ^ H58: Using language attributes to identify changes in the human language, Techniques for WCAG 2.0, W3C, accessibility level: AA.
  6. ^ "Setting animated gif images to stop blinking after n cycles (within 5 seconds)". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  7. ^ "Allowing the content to be paused and restarted from where it was paused". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  8. ^ The conference about Kaltura's partnership with Wikimedia Collaborating on Collaborative Video for Wikipedia announced that video will get "multi-lingual timed text subtitles" in a near future. Alt text was not mentioned and its implementation might not be planned.
  9. ^ "Providing an alternative for time based media". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  10. ^ "Providing an alternative for time-based media for audio-only content". Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C. Retrieved 1 January 2011.

General


Cite error: There are <ref group=WCAG-TECH> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=WCAG-TECH}} template (see the help page).