User talk:Mlillybaltimore

August 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The King of Limbs. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Joseph Fox 18:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at The King of Limbs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ironholds (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

I have concerns about this block and will be asking that it be reviewed. Please see my comments on the blocking administrator's talk. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Gorillaz, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 01:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

You're not providing any sources at all for the inclusion of alternative rock. If you want it to stay, you need to provide SOME sort of documentation.Mlillybaltimore (talk) 04:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Gorillaz (album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 01:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Plastic Beach, you may be blocked from editing. Friginator (talk) 01:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Boris (band), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Backtable ^{Speak to me}_{concerning my deeds.} 04:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Mlillybaltimore. Thank you. Backtable ^{Speak to me}_{concerning my deeds.} 05:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Genre warring

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Reckoner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Radiopathy •talk• 19:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I am ensuring consistency among song and album pages. I am not the one adding tenuous labels with no documentation to back it up.Mlillybaltimore (talk) 23:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Thom Yorke, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 00:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

At a very basic level, too many users are attempting include genres without citations at all. Over and over again, I've asked that sources be provided to include labels like alternative rock to albums like King of Limbs. To date, no one has provided ANY sources at all. I'm trying to provide accuracy and uniformity, not insisting on including outdated genres with nothing to back it up.Mlillybaltimore (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Party of Helicopters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Party of Helicopters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC (talk) 02:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)