Talk:Broadway Bro Down: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 70.54.100.210 - "→Ryan Mchee: new section" |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In this run of episodes for the season someone has been monopolizing this one person's review. He is of the AV Club. I never post these, and rarely post to wikipedia at all but this is kind of crazy. It's almost like free advertising for this gentleman and I think it should be stopped. Maybe I'm missing the point of relevence but please consider reviewing this for ad trolling. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.54.100.210|70.54.100.210]] ([[User talk:70.54.100.210|talk]]) 16:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
In this run of episodes for the season someone has been monopolizing this one person's review. He is of the AV Club. I never post these, and rarely post to wikipedia at all but this is kind of crazy. It's almost like free advertising for this gentleman and I think it should be stopped. Maybe I'm missing the point of relevence but please consider reviewing this for ad trolling. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.54.100.210|70.54.100.210]] ([[User talk:70.54.100.210|talk]]) 16:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
: I noticed this too and I agree with what you write. --[[Special:Contributions/82.171.70.54|82.171.70.54]] ([[User talk:82.171.70.54|talk]]) 17:13, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:13, 30 October 2011
Animation: South Park Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Ryan Mchee
In this run of episodes for the season someone has been monopolizing this one person's review. He is of the AV Club. I never post these, and rarely post to wikipedia at all but this is kind of crazy. It's almost like free advertising for this gentleman and I think it should be stopped. Maybe I'm missing the point of relevence but please consider reviewing this for ad trolling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.100.210 (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- I noticed this too and I agree with what you write. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2011 (UTC)