Break junction: Difference between revisions
Filling in 4 references using Reflinks wooo what a great tool |
m changed 'controller' to 'controlled', the verb |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''break junction''' is a electronic device which consists of two metal wires separated by a very thin gap, on the order of the inter-atomic spacing (less than a [[nanometer]]). This can be done by physically pulling the wires apart or through chemical etching or [[electromigration]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lifesciences.ieee.org/areas-of-convergence/feature-articles/48-from-molecular-electronics-to-proteonics-break-junctions-for-biomarker-detection |title=From Molecular Electronics to Proteonics: Break Junctions for Biomarker Detection - IEEE Life Sciences |publisher=Lifesciences.ieee.org |date=2009-04-11 |accessdate=2011-11-29}}</ref> As the wire breaks, the separation between the electrodes can be indirectly controlled by monitoring the electrical resistance of the junction. |
A '''break junction''' is a electronic device which consists of two metal wires separated by a very thin gap, on the order of the inter-atomic spacing (less than a [[nanometer]]). This can be done by physically pulling the wires apart or through chemical etching or [[electromigration]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lifesciences.ieee.org/areas-of-convergence/feature-articles/48-from-molecular-electronics-to-proteonics-break-junctions-for-biomarker-detection |title=From Molecular Electronics to Proteonics: Break Junctions for Biomarker Detection - IEEE Life Sciences |publisher=Lifesciences.ieee.org |date=2009-04-11 |accessdate=2011-11-29}}</ref> As the wire breaks, the separation between the electrodes can be indirectly controlled by monitoring the electrical resistance of the junction. |
||
After the gap is formed, its width can often be |
After the gap is formed, its width can often be controlled by bending the substrate that the metal contacts lie on. The gap can be controlled to a precision of [[picometer]]s.<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|url=http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v99/i2/e026601 |title=Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 026601 (2007): Tuning the Kondo Effect with a Mechanically Controllable Break Junction |publisher=Prl.aps.org |date= |accessdate=2011-11-29}}</ref> |
||
A typical conductance versus time trace during the breaking process (conductance is simply current divided by applied voltage bias) shows two regimes. First is a regime where the break junction comprises a [[quantum point contact]]. In this regime conductance decreases in steps equal to the [[conductance quantum]] <math>G_Q=2e^2/h</math> which is expressed through the [[electron charge]] (−''e'') and [[Planck's constant]] <math>h</math>. The conductance quantum has a value of 7.74×10<sup>−5</sup> siemens, corresponding to a resistance increase of roughly 12.9 kΩ. These step decreases are interpreted as the result of a decrease, as the electrodes are pulled apart, in the number of single-atom-wide metal strands bridging between the two electrodes, each strand having a conductance equal to the quantum of conductance. As the wire is pulled, the neck becomes thinner with fewer atomic strands in it. Each time the neck reconfigures, which happens abruptly, a step-like decrease of the conductance can be observed. This picture inferred from the current measurement has been confirmed by "in-situ" TEM imaging of the breaking process combined with current measurement.<ref name="nature">{{cite journal|author=H. Ohnishi, Y. Kondo and K. Takayanagi|title=Nature|volume=395|page=780|year=1998}}</ref><ref name="preview">{{cite journal|author=V. Rodrigues, T. Fuhrer and D. Ugarte|title=Physical Review Letters|volume=85|page=4124|year=2000}}</ref> |
A typical conductance versus time trace during the breaking process (conductance is simply current divided by applied voltage bias) shows two regimes. First is a regime where the break junction comprises a [[quantum point contact]]. In this regime conductance decreases in steps equal to the [[conductance quantum]] <math>G_Q=2e^2/h</math> which is expressed through the [[electron charge]] (−''e'') and [[Planck's constant]] <math>h</math>. The conductance quantum has a value of 7.74×10<sup>−5</sup> siemens, corresponding to a resistance increase of roughly 12.9 kΩ. These step decreases are interpreted as the result of a decrease, as the electrodes are pulled apart, in the number of single-atom-wide metal strands bridging between the two electrodes, each strand having a conductance equal to the quantum of conductance. As the wire is pulled, the neck becomes thinner with fewer atomic strands in it. Each time the neck reconfigures, which happens abruptly, a step-like decrease of the conductance can be observed. This picture inferred from the current measurement has been confirmed by "in-situ" TEM imaging of the breaking process combined with current measurement.<ref name="nature">{{cite journal|author=H. Ohnishi, Y. Kondo and K. Takayanagi|title=Nature|volume=395|page=780|year=1998}}</ref><ref name="preview">{{cite journal|author=V. Rodrigues, T. Fuhrer and D. Ugarte|title=Physical Review Letters|volume=85|page=4124|year=2000}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 06:50, 12 December 2011
A break junction is a electronic device which consists of two metal wires separated by a very thin gap, on the order of the inter-atomic spacing (less than a nanometer). This can be done by physically pulling the wires apart or through chemical etching or electromigration.[1] As the wire breaks, the separation between the electrodes can be indirectly controlled by monitoring the electrical resistance of the junction.
After the gap is formed, its width can often be controlled by bending the substrate that the metal contacts lie on. The gap can be controlled to a precision of picometers.[2]
A typical conductance versus time trace during the breaking process (conductance is simply current divided by applied voltage bias) shows two regimes. First is a regime where the break junction comprises a quantum point contact. In this regime conductance decreases in steps equal to the conductance quantum which is expressed through the electron charge (−e) and Planck's constant . The conductance quantum has a value of 7.74×10−5 siemens, corresponding to a resistance increase of roughly 12.9 kΩ. These step decreases are interpreted as the result of a decrease, as the electrodes are pulled apart, in the number of single-atom-wide metal strands bridging between the two electrodes, each strand having a conductance equal to the quantum of conductance. As the wire is pulled, the neck becomes thinner with fewer atomic strands in it. Each time the neck reconfigures, which happens abruptly, a step-like decrease of the conductance can be observed. This picture inferred from the current measurement has been confirmed by "in-situ" TEM imaging of the breaking process combined with current measurement.[3][4]
In a second regime, when the wire is pulled further apart, the conductance collapses to values less than the quantum of conductance. This is the tunneling regime where electrons tunnel through vacuum between the electrodes.
Use
Break junctions can be used to make electrical contacts to and study single molecules. [2][5][6]
References
Notes
- ^ "From Molecular Electronics to Proteonics: Break Junctions for Biomarker Detection - IEEE Life Sciences". Lifesciences.ieee.org. 2009-04-11. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ a b "Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 026601 (2007): Tuning the Kondo Effect with a Mechanically Controllable Break Junction". Prl.aps.org. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ H. Ohnishi, Y. Kondo and K. Takayanagi (1998). "Nature". 395: 780.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ V. Rodrigues, T. Fuhrer and D. Ugarte (2000). "Physical Review Letters". 85: 4124.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ "Lithographic mechanical break junctions for single-molecule measurements in vacuum: possibilities and limitations". Iopscience.iop.org. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
- ^ "Phys. Rev. B 79, 081404 (2009): Probing charge transport in single-molecule break junctions using inelastic tunneling". Prb.aps.org. Retrieved 2011-11-29.