Talk:California's 14th congressional district: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Out of date for 2012== |
==Out of date for 2012== |
||
It should be noted that most of the area falling under district 14 will be under district 18 for the 2012 elections. District 18 is below the new district 14, which takes up much of the area previously designated as district 12. --[[User:Xaliqen|Xaliqen]] ([[User talk:Xaliqen|talk]]) 16:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC) |
It should be noted that most of the area falling under district 14 will be under district 18 for the 2012 elections. District 18 is below the new district 14, which takes up much of the area previously designated as district 12. --[[User:Xaliqen|Xaliqen]] ([[User talk:Xaliqen|talk]]) 16:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Not much of an improvement. Absolutely ridiculous that they'd cut Scotts Valley in half. And what the hell the San Lorenzo Valley is supposed to have to do with Mountain View and Los Altos Hills I have no idea. It's not so obviously gerrymandered, but it's certainly a "creative" arrangement. [[Special:Contributions/74.220.76.54|74.220.76.54]] ([[User talk:74.220.76.54|talk]]) 23:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:40, 29 December 2011
California B‑class | ||||||||||
|
U.S. Congress B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Out of date for 2012
It should be noted that most of the area falling under district 14 will be under district 18 for the 2012 elections. District 18 is below the new district 14, which takes up much of the area previously designated as district 12. --Xaliqen (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not much of an improvement. Absolutely ridiculous that they'd cut Scotts Valley in half. And what the hell the San Lorenzo Valley is supposed to have to do with Mountain View and Los Altos Hills I have no idea. It's not so obviously gerrymandered, but it's certainly a "creative" arrangement. 74.220.76.54 (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)