Jump to content

User talk:Moondyne: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎humbarrassed: watch page lights up like christmas tree
please
Line 353: Line 353:
I will move text to sub page = please delete as non controversial author request - to fix it is well beyond my capacity in the short term - thanks [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I will move text to sub page = please delete as non controversial author request - to fix it is well beyond my capacity in the short term - thanks [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
::hell - I didnt think i was that far behind in trying to keep up with wa assessment - thanks forthat!!!! [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
::hell - I didnt think i was that far behind in trying to keep up with wa assessment - thanks forthat!!!! [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

==[[Phillip Hughes]]==

I'm a good faith editor who's donated money to Wikipedia and I get blocked for this huh? Wikipedia will go if editors such as yourself don't welcome new users and threaten to "block them" if they don't agree with you. Why can't you be peaceful and not threaten to block me? Perhaps suggest some balance between your opinion and mine which we can then put into the article? Wikipedia has too many users who drive away new users such as myself. Please Don't be one of them.

Revision as of 13:48, 17 February 2012

If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.


Mt Elephant

Moondyne,

There is no problem with conflict of interest over the Quarry problem, that has all been resolved by VCAT and no Quarry will be allowed and the situation is closed.

After that decision I then changed the "Mount Elephant" website, it is now a general interest and information site as is my sister site "Derrinallum", as you say maybe I should change my user name to reflect that.

I still think that the external links improve the Wiki experience, but as you will not allow them there's not much I can do about it.

Can this also be seen by mattinbng and others as I think it concerns all.

(Savelephant (talk) 07:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC))savelephant 5.2.2011[reply]

DYK

Hi Moondyne, you might not have noticed, but since the start of 2011, DYK contributors who have already had 5 articles featured are required to review an article before their article reaches the main page. Once you've reviewed one, can you note which you reviewed at T:TDYK#Arnold Cook? Thanks SmartSE (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

Thank you

Thank you, Moondyne, for uploading the image of author Fergus Hume. I have added it to the article, The Mystery of a Hansom Cab. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. –Moondyne 07:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

DYK for Arnold Cook

-- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Edith Dircksey Cowan Memorial article

Hello Moondyne! I just finished an article about the Edith Dircksey Cowan Memorial, at Kings Park, for Revista EnPunto. Ours is a magazine devoted to high end watches and one of our main features is a article about clock towers. Since the Summer edition will be devoted to lady's watches, the life of Ms. Dircksey Cowan and the Memorial erected for her were perfect for publishing. However, I can't find hi-res photos of it. Could you help me with a hi-res image, or two? We need them at 300dpi resolution at least 4*6 inches in size. You could send it to leon.aguilera AT gmail.com or via an FTP server. I will be greatly thankful. Revista EnPunto is freely distributed, you can visit us at http://www.enpunto.com (published in Spanish).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Klavaza (talkcontribs)

G'day Klavaza. I trust that if you use parts of the article in your magazine you'll give attribution to Wikipedia. It was written by User:Hesperian. Seeing you asked nicely, I'll definitely try to get some hi-res photos for you, but can't promise anything quickly as its a bit out of my normal commute. –Moondyne 04:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thought I spied SatSuro on Sunday, standing at the roundabout taking photos of the memorial - so I guess he's responding to this inquiry. Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent news. –Moondyne 05:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)+[reply]

Thanks you all for the nice photos sent in a zip file. They are more than adequate and will be used, along with quotations of your Wikipedia article, in my article for the mag. Thanks a lot again!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klavaza (talkcontribs) 01:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see from the talk page, and the list of contributors, that you've been pretty heavily involved in this page! I've had a bit of an attack on the page, with the target of getting it back to Featured List status, and I was hoping you could have a look over it for me. I've opened a peer review, in which I've stated some of the main (and more controversial changes), Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Ashes series/archive1. Regards, Harrias talk 00:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up and at first glance, good work! I'll drop a comment there in the next day or so after giving it some some thought. –Moondyne 03:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Replied to your comments, and made tweaks after other comments: might you be able to have another look? Harrias talk 20:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To let you know, I've now nominated this for FL, should you wish to make any comments, you can find it: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ashes series/archive2 Harrias talk 19:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Public Art Works

Am heading down to Busselton for a week of competitive sailing, will try and stop along the way and take some photos of the public artworks in Mandurah and Bunbury. Keen to get a pic of 'The Water Dance' on Forrest Highway and 'The Navigators' in Bunbury. Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky you. I'm doing Kojonup and Katanning tomorrow but reckon Busso will be heaps more exciting ;( If you do have extra time at Mandurah, there's a lot more[1] that can be added to the list but I was holding off until I got photos. –Moondyne 05:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Might have to leave earlier than I previously anticipated - good thing I know where a lot of these ones are, so locating them shouldn't be a problem - though will only do the more substantial public art works rather than the smaller mosiacs etc. What's your thoughts on the War Memorial? Is it public art or not? Dan arndt (talk) 09:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever you reckon. The more the merrier. –Moondyne 07:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have taken pics of Bunbury public art works & the one on the new Forrest Highway, will do the ones in Mandurah on the way back.

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

l

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

Water Dance

Have uploaded an image of 'The Water Dance' to commons - will put the rest of my photos up when I get back from Tasmania. 03:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Thansk, but I cant find it. Moondyne (talk) 07:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Found, thanks. Moondyne (talk) 02:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

G Rushes

Format - dont like current - links/refs and bolding in summary at top - would feel it would look better with refs in the sections below and no bolding - whatcha think? SatuSuro 09:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I unbolded but not sure what you mean re refs. Change it around if you wish. Moondyne (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nah I thought the refs should be in the heading sections - not in the lead para so to speak - as it looks very eccentric at the mo - but hey its probably how it pans out over additions - as to whether the heading sections remain unreferenced and the lead para does get the refs - it looks topsy turvy - maybe some extra stuff will balance it out - but hey its too hot to think about - why east coast rain and cool and we still hot? bah SatuSuro 13:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWar Page Removal

Hi--I just wanted to thank you for your tireless dedication to Wikipedia. Without editors like yourself, people might become confused (and interpret humor pages literally) and start taking Wikipedia too lightly. Jdrrmk (talk) 19:00, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fortescue Metals Group

Please see Talk:Fortescue Metals Group. Thanks. --Design (talk) 05:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Short History Of The World.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Short History Of The World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. Apparently orphaned by mistake. Moondyne (talk) 05:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:A Short History Of The World.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A Short History Of The World.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ΔT The only constant 08:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed Moondyne (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perth wetlands

Thought you might be interested in taking a look at a new article I created - Perth Wetlands - to bring together all the separate info on different pages. Any info, pics or sources you could contribute would be appreciated. Not sure if you have any thoughts on the title of the article - I thought 'Perth Wetlands' was the most descriptive and useful title, but it doesn't seem quite right. Cheers. IgnorantArmies 13:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

You good mate? [[2]] -danjel (talk to me) 14:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate, I'm better now. Moondyne (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Moondyne - is it something there are good medical remedies for? Trust it has abated - my condolences or jocularities - whichever might be of assistance (or not) SatuSuro 11:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

that is a relief :) SatuSuro 00:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prime lamb

In the US the term "prime lamb" is not used to mean "lamb bred for meat", but rather top-quality lamb according to the inpectional services of the USDA.[3] Lamb graded 'prime' may well come from stock bred specifically for meat, but that is not the definition. Hope this clarifies things. --Macrakis (talk) 03:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're making an unnecessary and false distinction. viz: The cite you give is from the Food Safety and Inspection Service. "Prime lamb" refers specifically to lambs used for meat. Moondyne (talk) 03:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure I understand your point. There are five grades used by the FSIS for lambs used for meat; only the top one is 'prime'. The definitions of the top two:
  • Prime grade is very high in tenderness, juiciness, and flavor. Its marbling enhances both flavor and juiciness.
  • Choice grade has slightly less marbling than prime, but still is of very high quality.
On the other hand, I haven't seen any evidence that the term 'prime lamb' is used in the sense "lamb bred for meat" in the US, but that appears to be the usage in the UK, Aus, and NZ. Any additional info you have on the terminology would be great. Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I think we're in agreement now and I initially got my wires crossed as to what your point was. My bad. In AU, the 'prime lamb industry' relates to the farming practice of raising lambs for slaughter and consumption as meat.[4]. In the US, it describes the meat.[5]. That is a slight oversimplification as the term is also used here occasionally for the meat, but not widely. Moondyne (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Substantive edit to the Cricket section on Wikipedia:Notability (sports)

I have undone your edit to Wikipedia:Notability (sports) as it appears to be substantive and without obvious discussion on the talk page to obtain consensus. I am making no judgement as to the actual edit, just that the notice at the top of the page is very clear about the need to obtain a consensus prior to any substantive change. Mtking (talk) 03:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also make no judgement, but the change was to bring the page in line with the parrallel guideline at WP:CRIN which was developed aftre lengthy discussion and consensus from participants at the Cricket project and has been stable and inplace for some time. and I ask you therefore to revert your revert. I apologise for not being clearer in my edit summary that that was what I was doing. Moondyne (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
edit conflict : May I suggest that you post to the talk page exactly that, leave it for a few days and then if there there are no major objections you can then make the change again, there is after all no rush is there? Mtking (talk) 03:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to do so. One other point FYI: A previous version [6] was a copy paste from WP:CRIN as it was at that time. The latter was subsequently updated but WP:NSPORTS wasn't. Moondyne (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Moondyne. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 06:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

66.66.27.196

Is 66.66.27.196 a sock of the banned NYscholar, or is his editing of one of the pages edited by NYscholar, immediately after the IP's block expired, merely coincidental? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots06:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thansk, IP reblocked. Moondyne (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with closing the current discussion, and agree that it had reached a dead end and there was no consensus for the proposed change as it was, I do think there was consensus for some form of change. As such I would like you to re-view your closing comment and re-word it to closer reflect that please. Mtking (talk) 08:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My wording was deliberate and considered. Participants seem happy to consider a change but none of the mooted changes got up. Consensus may change if a new wording can be found. Moondyne (talk) 09:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for closing this thread. I think you are right to do so and I appreciate the thoughtful wording you used. Johnlp (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

aha

returning with a good edit summary - trust you have suitable heating at your end of the woods :) SatuSuro 14:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

G'day cobber. I'm still waiting for my lunch invite! Drop me a line when you've got a few hours to spare. Moondyne (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yeah I can think of a lot of jokes against self about the most delayed lunch.. will try soon SatuSuro 14:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for staying on the case, Moondyne. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that "A page and its talk page should not both be protected at the same time.". That makes sense but I'll leave in place until somene can suggest a better solution. Moondyne (talk) 02:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note that your protection log comment at Talk:Harold Pinter is confusing (You have it as "Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked" which... clearly isn't the case for an article talk page) - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 10:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you still need this file (description reads "can be deleted in 48 hours")? The reason I ask: Images, whose filenames ends with a %-sgn, are often not properly displayed (bugzilla:26233). Currently I’m looking for files like this, to move them to a name that let’s them work, but if you don’t need this anymore, it could be deleted. Greetings --Schniggendiller talk 21:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. Thanks. Moondyne (talk) 22:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have to admit that there’s another file (File:PortalRhodeIsland-IE8-49%.jpg). Would be easier if I reported this in one go. Sorry :-) Greetings --Schniggendiller talk 15:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moondyne, just a quick question for you: This recently uploaded picture of old Gary smells an aweful lot like a copyright violation to me. What do you think? Calistemon (talk) 22:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted. Deleted as copyvio. Moondyne (talk) 00:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work, quick as allways! Calistemon (talk) 03:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John MacLennan Buchanan listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John MacLennan Buchanan. This proposal will potentially affect the disambiguation of all John Buchanan articles, so you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MTS Peanut (talk) 07:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Moondyne. Thanks very much for your kind words back in January and my apologies for not replying sooner. I've had a lot of problems to deal with this year but I'm looking to get involved again. Probably not so much as formerly but AA asked me for help with the to-do list and I'm going to see what I can do there. Well done on your recent action in dealing with the troll but sorry it seems to have brought you to his attention. All the best. ----Jack | talk page 11:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good. Keep well. Moondyne (talk) 16:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

recovering sort of - cheers SatuSuro 10:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interview with Wikimedia Foundation

Hello Moondyne, I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser here at the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign we're seeking out and interviewing active Wikipedians like yourself, in order to produce a broader and more representative range of "personal appeals" to run come November. If you'd like to participate in this project, please email me at amuszalski@wikimedia.org. Interviews are typically conducted by phone or Skype and take between 30-90 minutes. (Note: This invitation is open to any interested Wikipedian — If you're reading this, and would like to be interviewed as well, please contact me.) Thanks! Aaron (WMF) (talk) 04:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Moondyne. Much appreciated. All the best. ----Jack | talk page 19:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Moondyne! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Page protection

Hi Moondyne. As I've already replied to Drmies, that's a good idea. This has been going on intermittently for nearly four years now and I suppose I should think about taking whatever steps are necessary. I don't care about Daft's opinion of me or my work as he is entitled to it. The problems are that he will not accept other people disagreeing with his view and he attacks other WP members to try and get at me through them. I don't suppose we can do any more than revert his posts and protect certain pages. Thanks again. ----Jack | talk page 08:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the padlock, Moondyne. I hope you haven't locked me in! Do I get a key? ----Jack | talk page 11:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Haha - you should be OK. If any problems sing out. Moondyne (talk) 12:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Barnstar

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
For helping to improve the citations on the Andrew Forrest article

Great job on your help on referencing the Andrew Forrest article! Keep the great work up. Twigfan (talk) 10:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch

I had spotted the sp mistake - and missed the context :( - cheers SatuSuro 07:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Catholic bishops and archbishops of Perth, Western Australia , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rangasyd (talk) 00:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited City of York (barque), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed Moondyne (talk) 13:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Football League (Australia)

Moondyne, may I ask you to please unlock this page. The dispute that led to the edit war that you were stopping has now been resolved (see the talk page and maybe the Dispute Resolution board if you are interested) and I wish to fix the article up back to more or less what IP 60 had. Footy Freak7 (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Royal King's Park Tennis Club, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gymnasium and Wayne Arthurs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Gulf

Hello Moondyne - Thanks for advising re not using italics in blockquotes and pointing out the style manual - Will now need to change a few others I've made. Also left a reply for you on my talk page re Broome photographs KHS-Boab (talk) 05:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Great work BTW. Moondyne (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Claise Brook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UWA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi Moondyne, I made an edit in your userspace but hit "Save" too early by mistake. The edit summary should have read "fixed a link, hope you don't mind". By the way, your list of contributions is pretty impressive, keep up the good work :) jonkerz ♠talk 13:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Moondyne (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Petertrick on Beyond Capricorn page

Hi. I notice user petertrick has been active on Beyond Capricorn page again. You pointed out possible conflict of interest to him last year.I have only limited connectivity for next week, thought you might keep an eye on it. Cheers Nickm57 (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Moondyne (talk) 14:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Beyond Capricorn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colloquium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Moondyne... thanks for your edit at WP:CRIC/GR, I was sure there was a better way than using those breaks and you have saved me from needing to search for it. Much appreciated. Regards, EdChem (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me as well, I was choiceless of noing no ther technique, but yours was amazing! --Extra 999 (Contact me) 16:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Australia Day! Thank you for contributing to Australian content!

Australian Wikimedian Recognition (AWR)
Thank you for your contributions on English Wikipedia that have helped improve Australian related content. :D It is very much appreciated. :D Enjoy your Australia Day and please continue your good work! LauraHale (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Australia Day! Thank you for contributing to Australian content!

Australian Wikimedian Recognition (AWR)
Thank you for your contributions on English Wikipedia that have helped improve Australian related content. :D It is very much appreciated. :D Enjoy your Australia Day and please continue your good work! LauraHale (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your eagle eye and editorial flair

Is needed at Maylands Airport - not a very auspicious start but surely has lots more linking and things - thanks SatuSuro 13:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also I would have thought a category of former airfields rather than defunct would be a good australian category - watchathink? SatuSuro 13:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool start. Category:Defunct airports seems to be already well established. I'm not fussed what words you use. Moondyne (talk) 14:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help SatuSuro 21:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop's House

Thanks - went there for a meal late last year. Which reminds me to start work on an article for St George's House. Dan arndt (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

likewise on roy hill, i like the summary - new stun!! obviously you work in AC comfort :) SatuSuro 08:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
tyop. meant to say stub. AC is struggling today. Moondyne (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
yup I realise that - walking in the full sun came to an end at 2.30 i rang the boss and said i was going home:) - got home and found the max had been 2 hours earlier - whoopee for wearing full sun cover .... hmmm... SatuSuro 08:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

State Register of Heritage Places

Can you at least leave the headers (ie. LGA area) on the heritage list - all for taking away the duplicated places but need to leave the headers so that the blanks can be filled in at a later date. Dan arndt (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Will fix shortly. Moondyne (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi y'all. In relation to the list which I am compiling at User:Russavia/Heritage -- can I please ask that editors do not edit this list whilst it is in my userspace -- I am compiling it for the eventual move into mainspace, but I am also using it for a project that I am working on, and I need it to be accurate -- Someone has added Ascot Racecourse and Perth Airport -- these are not on the State Register of Heritage Places, but rather they are found on the heritage.wa.gov.au website by an all-encompassing search. The same thing with some of the added Nedlands listings. Editors have also removed a heap of table lines which I am using to make my job in compiling the list easier. Another thing, is that this list might take me 6 months to complete; and when I eventually move it into mainspace, the attribution will be a bitch of a thing to do. I don't mind editors raising fixes and the like on the talk page at User talk:Russavia/Heritage, but please leave fixing the work in progress to myself -- this is mainly said for reasons of the attribution, but also because it needs to be accurate. I am glad that some are already finding the list useful, but please contribute to it for the time being on the talk page if you can. Thanks, Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 04:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. If any you have any suggestions for the list itself, let me know on the talk page, and we can make those changes if the ideas are good :) Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 04:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, when you guys are creating articles, can you please remove Category:Heritage places of Western Australia if the only register the place is on is the State Register of Heritage Places, in which case please categorise it into Category:State Register of Heritage Places. Also, please be careful to only include those on my list in this category. The other lists as well that I am working on. Also, any photos which are found on Commons, please peruse the categorisation scheme at Commons:Category:State Register of Heritage Places, and create categories for heritage places, even if there is only one photo. Also, i have noticed it might be adviseable to create categories on Commons where subcats and files are sorted by LGA. Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 05:33, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trover error

Thanks - Trove has already been notified (at least they now have 2xbeen told) - redrose has also been acknowledged - it is the use of an '-' in access date that gets up redroses nose - cheers and thanks SatuSuro 10:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

humbarrassed

I knew there was something I should have spent the last 4 months fix ing it up.... I will move text to sub page = please delete as non controversial author request - to fix it is well beyond my capacity in the short term - thanks SatuSuro 12:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hell - I didnt think i was that far behind in trying to keep up with wa assessment - thanks forthat!!!! SatuSuro 12:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a good faith editor who's donated money to Wikipedia and I get blocked for this huh? Wikipedia will go if editors such as yourself don't welcome new users and threaten to "block them" if they don't agree with you. Why can't you be peaceful and not threaten to block me? Perhaps suggest some balance between your opinion and mine which we can then put into the article? Wikipedia has too many users who drive away new users such as myself. Please Don't be one of them.