Jump to content

User:Caracola/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caracola (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Caracola (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


When people read a story, they not only construct mental representations of the words and sentences within it, but also of the situations that are suggested by the words and sentences. <ref> Zwaan, Rolf A., Joseph P. Magliano, and Arthur C. Graesser. 1995. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, (2): 386-397, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/622053419?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012). </ref> These representations have become known as situation models, which are “mental representations of the state of affairs described in a text,” not the text itself. <ref> Zwaan, Rolf A. 1999. Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8, (1): 15-18, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619411968?accountid=15115 (accessed March 12, 2012).</ref> Much of the research on situation models in narrative comprehension suggests that the readers behave as though they are in the narrated situation, rather than outside of it looking in.
When people read a story, they not only construct mental representations of the words and sentences within it, but also of the situations that are suggested by the words and sentences. <ref> Zwaan, Rolf A., Joseph P. Magliano, and Arthur C. Graesser. 1995. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, (2): 386-397, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/622053419?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012). </ref> These representations have become known as situation models, which are “mental representations of the state of affairs described in a text,” not the text itself. <ref> Zwaan, Rolf A. 1999. Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8, (1): 15-18, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619411968?accountid=15115 (accessed March 12, 2012).</ref> Much of the research on situation models in narrative comprehension suggests that the readers behave as though they are in the narrated situation, rather than outside of it looking in.

Since the current section on Situation Models has only a brief definition, I will first provide a much more detailed definition of what a Situation Model is. Situation models are created when readers form a mental representation while reading a text. Each model that is created represents a unique situation or event (Radvansky, Gabriel and Dijkstra 2007). Readers get inside of stories and vividly experience them, feeling sympathy for characters, “happy when good things occur, worry when characters are in danger,” etc. (Zwann 1999). A book by Zwaan, Magliano, and Graesser (1995) explains how situation models are constructed through the use of a structure building framework. A Structure building framework involves the reader’s construction of mental structures when they read a text as they map out information coming in, onto the evolving structure (Zwann, Magliano and grasser 1995). When there are discontinuities, or gaps, in the situation being constructed, the reader is prompted to shift from building one structure to another.

Next, I will go on to discuss the 3 levels of representation when a person reads a text. An article by Radavansky (2005) outlines the 3 basic levels. The lowest level is the surface form level, which are basic representations of the words and syntax that were used in the, followed by the propositional text based level which include abstract representations of the idea units in the text, and finally the highest level is the situation model, which includes representations of the situation to which the text refers (Radavansky, 2005). Basically, the first two levels are surface and text based representations of what the text was, and the highest level is a representation of what the text was about.

When examining situation models, it is also important to discuss the different dimension involved in their construction. The 3 dimensions I will be discussing include time, space and causation (Zwaan 1995). It is also important to look at the effects which continuity and discontinuity within each dimension have on the construction of a situation model (Zwaan, Magliano, and Graesser, 1995). Since the construction of many situation models is dynamic, it is important to look at the way in which humans integrate new and incoming information into their representation. There are several updating theories which discuss this, and I plan to discuss the two basic ones. These are here-and-now view, and memory-based text processing view (O’Brien, Cook, Peracchi 2004).

Finally I will discuss the effects of situation models in regards to aging as described by Radavansky and Dijkstra (2007). In contrast, I will also discuss the abilities of children to construct situation models, and the difficulties they face described by Pyykkonen and Jarvikivi (20120).





Revision as of 22:21, 23 March 2012

When people read a story, they not only construct mental representations of the words and sentences within it, but also of the situations that are suggested by the words and sentences. [1] These representations have become known as situation models, which are “mental representations of the state of affairs described in a text,” not the text itself. [2] Much of the research on situation models in narrative comprehension suggests that the readers behave as though they are in the narrated situation, rather than outside of it looking in.

Since the current section on Situation Models has only a brief definition, I will first provide a much more detailed definition of what a Situation Model is. Situation models are created when readers form a mental representation while reading a text. Each model that is created represents a unique situation or event (Radvansky, Gabriel and Dijkstra 2007). Readers get inside of stories and vividly experience them, feeling sympathy for characters, “happy when good things occur, worry when characters are in danger,” etc. (Zwann 1999). A book by Zwaan, Magliano, and Graesser (1995) explains how situation models are constructed through the use of a structure building framework. A Structure building framework involves the reader’s construction of mental structures when they read a text as they map out information coming in, onto the evolving structure (Zwann, Magliano and grasser 1995). When there are discontinuities, or gaps, in the situation being constructed, the reader is prompted to shift from building one structure to another.

Next, I will go on to discuss the 3 levels of representation when a person reads a text. An article by Radavansky (2005) outlines the 3 basic levels. The lowest level is the surface form level, which are basic representations of the words and syntax that were used in the, followed by the propositional text based level which include abstract representations of the idea units in the text, and finally the highest level is the situation model, which includes representations of the situation to which the text refers (Radavansky, 2005). Basically, the first two levels are surface and text based representations of what the text was, and the highest level is a representation of what the text was about.

When examining situation models, it is also important to discuss the different dimension involved in their construction. The 3 dimensions I will be discussing include time, space and causation (Zwaan 1995). It is also important to look at the effects which continuity and discontinuity within each dimension have on the construction of a situation model (Zwaan, Magliano, and Graesser, 1995). Since the construction of many situation models is dynamic, it is important to look at the way in which humans integrate new and incoming information into their representation. There are several updating theories which discuss this, and I plan to discuss the two basic ones. These are here-and-now view, and memory-based text processing view (O’Brien, Cook, Peracchi 2004).

Finally I will discuss the effects of situation models in regards to aging as described by Radavansky and Dijkstra (2007). In contrast, I will also discuss the abilities of children to construct situation models, and the difficulties they face described by Pyykkonen and Jarvikivi (20120).


[3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]

==References==

  1. ^ Zwaan, Rolf A., Joseph P. Magliano, and Arthur C. Graesser. 1995. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, (2): 386-397, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/622053419?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012).
  2. ^ Zwaan, Rolf A. 1999. Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8, (1): 15-18, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619411968?accountid=15115 (accessed March 12, 2012).
  3. ^ Bestgen, Yves, and Vincent Dupont. 2003. The construction of spatial situation models during reading. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 67, (3): 209-218, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/620174060?accountid=15115 (accessed March 09, 2012.
  4. ^ Bower, Gordon H., and Mike Rinck. 2001. Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27, (1): 81-98, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619527697?accountid=15115 (accessed March 08, 2012)
  5. ^ Dutke, Stephan. 2003. Anaphor resolution as a function of spatial distance and priming: Exploring the spatial distance effect in situation models. Experimental Psychology 50, (4): 270-284, https://www
  6. ^ Gilliam, Sara Elizabeth. Accessibility of situation model dimensions: An exploration of multidimensionality. Ph.D. diss., , https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/622053419?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)
  7. ^ Komeda, Hidetsugu, and Takashi Kusumi. 2006. The effect of a protagonists emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & cognition 34, (7): 1548-1556, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/621606055?accountid=15115 (accessed March 12, 2012
  8. ^ OBrien, Edward J., Anne E. Cook, and Kelly A. Peracchi. 2004. Updating situation models: Reply to zwaan and madden (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, (1): 289-291, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/620240771?accountid=15115 (accessed March 08, 2012)
  9. ^ Pyykkönen, Pirita, and Juhani Järvikivi. 2012. Children and situation models of multiple events. Developmental psychology 48, (2): 521-529, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/896406283?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)
  10. ^ Radvansky, Gabriel A., and Katinka Dijkstra. 2007. Aging and situation model processing. Psychonomic bulletin & review 14, (6): 1027-1042, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/622009316?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)
  11. ^ Radvansky, Gabriel A. 2005. Situation models, propositions, and the fan effect. Psychonomic bulletin & review 12, (3): 478-483, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/620874257?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)
  12. ^ Ruiming, Wang, Mo Lei, Jia Demei, Leng Ying, and Li Li. 2006. Mechanism of constructing and updating situation models in text-reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica 38, (1): 30-40, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/621164529?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)
  13. ^ Traxler, Matthew J., Donald J. Foss, Rachel E. Seely, Barbara Kaup, and Robin K. Morris. 2000. Priming in sentence processing: Intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models. Journal of psycholinguistic research 29, (6): 581-595, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619653995?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)
  14. ^ Waniek, Jacqueline, Angela Brunstein, Anja Naumann, and Josef F. Krems. 2003. Interaction between text structure representation and situation model in hypertext reading. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie 62, (2): 103-111, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/620278507?accountid=15115 (accessed March 09, 2012)
  15. ^ Xianyou, He, and Zeng Xiangyan. 2002. The role of temporal information in the construction of situation models. Acta Psychologica Sinica 34, (6): 589-595, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619815235?accountid=15115 (accessed March 10, 2012)
  16. ^ Zwaan, Rolf A., and Gabriel A. Radvansky. 1998. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological bulletin 123, (2): 162-185, https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi/docview/619274157?accountid=15115 (accessed March 11, 2012)