Jump to content

Talk:Mumbai: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 14.98.45.43 (talk) to last version by Kwamikagami
Line 148: Line 148:


Back to POV edit warring, this time claiming that Marathi is English of all things (I guess, since we have a note not to add Marathi, he's adding Marathi but disguising it as English?), and that the city is no longer called Bombay. I know people born and raised there who continue to call it "Bombay" when speaking English, and of course we've been over this many times: it's a close call whether the article itself should be at "Mumbai" or "Bombay". — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Back to POV edit warring, this time claiming that Marathi is English of all things (I guess, since we have a note not to add Marathi, he's adding Marathi but disguising it as English?), and that the city is no longer called Bombay. I know people born and raised there who continue to call it "Bombay" when speaking English, and of course we've been over this many times: it's a close call whether the article itself should be at "Mumbai" or "Bombay". — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
:: This has been discussed many times before. My opinion is that a city has an official name although all other names do not cease to exist. The official name is now Mumbai, whether it is in Marathi language or English language. There is no such thing as Mumbai in Marathi, Bambai in Hindi and Bombay in English. The introduction should be Mumbai, formerly known as Bombay. In the article there should be a mention that the city is still referred by many as Bambai or Bombay and that many societies, companies, and organisations retain the name Bombay, eg Bombay Stock Exchange. All 3 names still refer to this city. [[User:Ninadhardikar|Ninadhardikar]] ([[User talk:Ninadhardikar|talk]]) 04:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:42, 3 May 2012

Template:VA

Former featured articleMumbai is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleMumbai has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 9, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
March 23, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
May 27, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
July 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 22, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
August 29, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 15, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Edit request on 22 December 2011

Hello, The Indian railway has announced more than 25 direct trains and more than 10 alternate trains from Mumbai city to Uttar Pradesh. These trains are playing ravishing role not only in Indian railway but also Indian economy.Because of this central railway is considered as one of major and important rail route than any other. Kindly include detail of the article regarding this particular matter. Thanking you. Ravishankar (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected due to WP:OR and WP:UNDUE. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 February 2012

RESPECTED SIR, My name is Saurav Surve from Mumbai,India. I wanted to see the profile of SUBODH KUMAR, who is the Municipal Commissioner of our city. I saw his profile on WIKIPEDIA. But in the post of the Municipal Commissioner of our city, you have given the profile of other SUBODH KUMAR who is a Football player playing for EAST BENGAL FOOTBALL CLUB. So I wanted to bring this correction to your notice. The information of the 'REAL' Municipal Commissioner is given below:

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation started the New Year with a new Municipal Commissioner, less than two months before the budget estimates for the next fiscal are to be presented. On Monday, Subodh Kumar, who was additional secretary department of telecommunication in the Central government, took over from Swadheen Kshatriya who has been transferred to the state revenue department as principal secretary after a 13-month stint as Municipal Commissioner.

The transfer has raised eyebrows since Kshatriya’s tenure has been one of the shortest by any commissioner in the BMC in recent years. Kumar is not entirely new to the BMC and was its additional municipal commissioner (projects) between 1998 and 2001. Kumar is known for his expertise in financial matters.

Kshatriya refused to accept that the recent criticism of the BMC’s financial mismanagement by CM Prithviraj Chavan could have been behind his transfer. “We IAS officers get orders from the government and we have to act accordingly. If the Maharashtra government wants me to join its revenue department, I have to do it without asking them for the reason. My tenure in the BMC was short, but it was fruitful in many ways. Since Subodh Kumar is more senior and better experienced than me, I am sure his presence will benefit the BMC,” said Kshatriya.

Kumar said he was vaguely aware of the financial mismanagement and technical problems rampant in the BMC since the double accounting system was introduced along with SAP. “A governing body should never be afraid of change and it is natural for some problems to arise when something as huge as the whole accounting system is modified. I will try to speed up the work towards solving the issues. I am still not fully aware of the financial condition that the BMC is in, but I am sure I will get the required knowledge from my colleagues,” said Kumar a 1977 batch IAS officer of the Maharashtra cadre.

Kumar has also worked as Principal Secretary (Finance) and as Excise Commissioner and Sales Tax Commissioner. He has also worked as Textile Commissioner at the Centre and Chief of Mumbai Housing. Kumar was also part of the auction of 3G and BWA Spectrum in Telecom Ministry which raked in Rs 1,06,000 crore for the government.

I HOPE YOU WILL EDIT THE INFORMATION WHICH IS TRUE TO MY KNOWLEDGE. THANK YOU.

                                                                                                      YOURS FAITHFULLY 
                                                                                                         -SAURAV SURVE

Sau97.surve (talk) 06:06, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Not an edit request at all.  Abhishek  Talk 06:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Partly addressed. Though an article is not created, the link is rectified. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT REQUEST 3.1. Climate

The record high is 40.2 °C (100 °F) on 28 March 1982,[130] and the record low is 7.4 °C (50 °F) on 27 January 1962.[131]

In fact, 7.4 degrees Celsius = 45.32 degrees Fahrenheit

Thanks for noting this. Now corrected.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 24 March 2012


106.199.217.41 (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC) The Mumbai city name Is should be in Marathi[reply]

 Not done: Go through this.  Abhishek  Talk 18:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV edit war, again

Back to POV edit warring, this time claiming that Marathi is English of all things (I guess, since we have a note not to add Marathi, he's adding Marathi but disguising it as English?), and that the city is no longer called Bombay. I know people born and raised there who continue to call it "Bombay" when speaking English, and of course we've been over this many times: it's a close call whether the article itself should be at "Mumbai" or "Bombay". — kwami (talk) 23:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed many times before. My opinion is that a city has an official name although all other names do not cease to exist. The official name is now Mumbai, whether it is in Marathi language or English language. There is no such thing as Mumbai in Marathi, Bambai in Hindi and Bombay in English. The introduction should be Mumbai, formerly known as Bombay. In the article there should be a mention that the city is still referred by many as Bambai or Bombay and that many societies, companies, and organisations retain the name Bombay, eg Bombay Stock Exchange. All 3 names still refer to this city. Ninadhardikar (talk) 04:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]