User talk:Democracy112

--Democracy112 (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

If you're asking how Wikipedia articles should be structured and formatted, etc, the place to look is Wikipedia:Manual of Style, and its linked subpages, eg Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

New articles

Thanks for your interest in contributing new articles to Wikipedia. However, I would like to ask you to be more careful when you are writing. It seems that most of the articles you have created include significant errors. If you are unfamiliar with the topics you are writing about, it might be a good idea to get input from more knowledgeable Wikipedia editors before creating an article. Also, the fact that you have classified an article about an amoeba as a chemistry article shows that you are probably not paying close enough attention to what you are doing. Thank you. ChemNerd (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Can you please explain to me what I am doing wrong?--Democracy112 (talk) 15:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, here are few examples: aminomethylphosphonic acid showed a complete misunderstanding of what aminomethylphosphonic acid is; the molecular formula in ammonium orthomolybdate was incorrect;activating agent inappropriately ascribed specific chemical and toxicological properties to something that is not a specific chemical compound; Aconchulinida referred to it as a sub-class within a genus, which doesn't make sense because a sub-class is a higher-ranking grouping than a genus (plus the reference you cite clearly refers to it an an order, not a subclass). ChemNerd (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

So should I make articles after I am slightly more expirienced.--Democracy112 (talk) 16:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

I had a look at wp:mos and made all the Flabellina based articles? Are they acceptable now?--Democracy112 (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not saying that you necessarily need to stop creating articles. The manual-of-style-related problems are not my primary concern either. I'm asking that you be careful enough to make sure that you are not adding blatantly incorrect information. As for the Flabellina articles you just created, I don't see any major problems with them (but I'm not an expert). ChemNerd (talk) 17:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Also, please fix the formatting; see this fix. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

 Fixed--Democracy112 (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, we all make mistakes, thus I am not making the same mistakes twice.--Democracy112 (talk) 17:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Why do I have strong suspicions that you're User:Deathlaser? The lack of publishing information in the sources and the type of stubs gave the game away did it not?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Who's that?--Democracy112 (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Actifry"

A page you created, Actifry, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Breawycker (talk to me!) 16:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC)