Talk:Coco Austin: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::based on this new evidence (http://famousplastic.com/category/nicole-coco-austin/) i think it's safe to assume that she was indeed surgically "enhanced". --[[User:Oren neu dag|Oren neu dag]] ([[User talk:Oren neu dag|talk]]) 05:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC) |
:::based on this new evidence (http://famousplastic.com/category/nicole-coco-austin/) i think it's safe to assume that she was indeed surgically "enhanced". --[[User:Oren neu dag|Oren neu dag]] ([[User talk:Oren neu dag|talk]]) 05:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::I don't see why anyone thinks she has them given the lack of evidence, as her legs are proportionate. [[Special:Contributions/82.32.11.95|82.32.11.95]] ([[User talk:82.32.11.95|talk]]) 18:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:37, 24 June 2012
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
Her figure
Is there any reason why she has such a noticeable figure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnOicheGhealai (talk • contribs) 12:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
It seems rather obvious that her figure is the main point of her activities and consequent notability. She has got... has got... er, she is... um. Her figure is... noticeable. Centrepull (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I wondered that - has she had buttock implants? This photo [1] uploaded onto Perez Hilton yesterday (headed "Bootylicious Is An Understatement") suggests perhaps she has, as I can't belive that derriere is for real. 81.159.88.200 (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- based on this new evidence (http://famousplastic.com/category/nicole-coco-austin/) i think it's safe to assume that she was indeed surgically "enhanced". --Oren neu dag (talk) 05:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see why anyone thinks she has them given the lack of evidence, as her legs are proportionate. 82.32.11.95 (talk) 18:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)