Jump to content

User talk:Callanecc: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 243: Line 243:
Alright Ill find a source [[Special:Contributions/24.172.135.130|24.172.135.130]] ([[User talk:24.172.135.130|talk]]) 14:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Alright Ill find a source [[Special:Contributions/24.172.135.130|24.172.135.130]] ([[User talk:24.172.135.130|talk]]) 14:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
::Thanks, good job with signature :). Also note that another editor has reinserted the information so you just need to insert a source (and remove the <nowiki>{{Cn}}</nowiki> tag and possibly reword it. '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]]) <small>[[Template:talkback|talkback]] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 14:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
::Thanks, good job with signature :). Also note that another editor has reinserted the information so you just need to insert a source (and remove the <nowiki>{{Cn}}</nowiki> tag and possibly reword it. '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]]) <small>[[Template:talkback|talkback]] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 14:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Here i found a source but i dont know exactly how to put it in heres the link http://www.themeparktourist.com/news/20120419/6550/kings-islands-dinosaurs-alive-3d-movie-be-free-2012-season [[Special:Contributions/24.172.135.130|24.172.135.130]] ([[User talk:24.172.135.130|talk]]) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:16, 10 July 2012

Template:Useronline

Notice Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Please read this page first...


Edit waring? and what's his problem??

I don't understand what's going on in mammography. I put in new lead info, shorten it radically on request, guy puts very outdated and misinfo back in and calls me a edit warrior?32cllou (talk) 04:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I guess i'm dealing with editors who are reps of the medical industry complex (re military industrial complex) conflict of interest?32cllou (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I don't see any evidence that the other editors on that page have a conflict of interest. It seems like a normal content dispute to me, and it should not involve the motivations of other editors unless there is clear evidence that someone is trying to disrupt Wikipedia. --Jprg1966 (talk) 05:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, couldn't have said it better myself. 32cllou, you need to be careful to assume good faith and comment on content, not on the contributor. I still don't see a reason for me to get involved, however, you need to be very careful to make sure you don't get into an other edit war as this may lead to a block. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What is a edit war (define) and block? How do I block other editors? All my edits after they started warring were tweeks toward meeting their objections.32cllou (talk) 01:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)32cllou (talk) 01:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like changes now respected, so no prb. Odd that they show up so fast though the exising was so bad. And odd they make changes that all dilute the paraphrase. Odd that they send me on snipe hunts (to not relevant wiki writing guideline pages. Odd they send me war warnings. I asked about edit wars but one of the i think warring editors provided that page. Odd they are not constructive in their edits, initially simply undo lots of work. But thanks again for help.32cllou (talk) 01:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look at WP:EW and WP:BP. If you have a problem in the future let me know (when it starts) and I'll see what I can do to help. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Any particular reason you removed a blp prod from Technotic? Think you need to have a recap on WP:RS...--Otterathome (talk) 16:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see the article anymore becuase it's been deleted, but if I removed the BLPPROD I would have decided that at least one of the references was reliable enough. I quick look over WP:CIVIL & WP:AGF and thinking how to word messages like this might also be of assistance to you. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would look at those two pages if you left a message for me in the first place. Which reference is reliable then?
  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
I can provide the full article if you think that would help.--Otterathome (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, having seen them again they aren't reliable, don't know what I thought I saw in them. Sorry about that, Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 09:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rational Automation Framework

Hi--

I just resubmitted this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IBM_Rational_Automation_Framework) with more external references, from sources like Gartner and a Hurwitz.com study. I am puzzled that the article was rejected; I was very careful to present only objective information with no marketing slant, and I provided a number of non-IBM links. It seems to me that comparable articles from other IBM products, as well as from competitors, have poorer or almost nonexistent references--for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Center_Configuration_Manager http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Fusion_Middleware http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentum

I am not trying to get away with something here--all I'm trying to do is get a bare-bones article in place about a significant piece of software. I have carefully studied all the articles on how to write for Wikipedia and done my homework in terms of tracking down significant references. If you still find the article unsuitable, I would really appreciate a more detailed explanation of what your expectations are and where my article has failed to meet them.

Thanks!

Lshiner (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting in the extra work, I've accepted it and moved it into main space (IBM Rational Automation Framework). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you direct me of provide?

So, I couldn't sleep initially last night having watched this news on induced birth harm to children http://abcnews.go.com/Health/birth-37-38-weeks-linked-lower-math-reading/story?id=16683067#.T_MJqPVLFh6 since that's what prob happened to my neighbor wonderful kid but slow development and had scary breathing probs first year. Both prob due to induced like 34 weeks. Need to find the article talking about resperatory harm.

How can I get the Pediatrics and OBGYN Journal articles mentioned? Can I cite the ABC report to say states (Oregon and Arizona) and hospitals are moving to limit induced births to if there's proven high risk otherwise to mothers, or at least 39 weeks into pregnancy? I seem to remember that doctors aren't sure when a woman became pregnant, and will look for that too.32cllou (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure on the rules regarding medical sources, I suggest you ask User:Jmh649, as he has a pretty good idea of the rules and doesn't seem to mind helping. Let me know if not, and I'll see what I can do. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I put the same Q to his talk and no response yet. You didn't understand my Q. The ref is great qualiity but I don't have access to those Journals.32cllou (talk) 16:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How do I reference this TED presentation in prostate cancer and guess my next project is treatment of heart disease (they both can be easily quickly reversed)? http://www.ted.com/talks/dean_ornish_on_healing.html32cllou (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you leave a message on the article's talk page asking someone to include the journals it may work. Although I suspect Doc James could be of a lot more help (he may have access or know where to get them from). Regarding the ABC News report see WP:MEDRS#Popular press, but if you want to include it the template to use is Template:Cite news.
I suggest Template:Cite video for the YouTube clip (TED presentation), although make sure it complies with WP:MEDRS.
Also have a look at the respose from the Teahouse. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at Cntras's talk page.
Message added 14:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Cntras (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

and again. -Cntras (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campusdada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campusdada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campusdada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KTC (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at LuK3's talk page.
Message added 13:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Luke (Talk) 13:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dr. Zaius

The article was redirected to List of Planet of the Apes characters on 22 February 2011, but then reverted six months later [8]. Since then, nothing else has been added except additional cruft.

Additionally, discussion is not necessary. The other articles were merged into List of Planet of the Apes characters without discussion.

165.125.144.133 (talk) 19:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that it was reverted (twice) that means that there needs to be a discussion of some sort, being WP:BOLD should really only be done once or twice (at most - otherwise it's vandalism). I can't comment on the other articles as I don't know their specific circumstances. The best thing to do would have been to open a discussion on the article's talk page and wait a few days, especially given that the article has been edited recently. We usually don't follow time constraints on Wikipedia, so there is no reason it had to be done as soon as possible. In any case you have done it now, and I'm not going to revert it again. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 19:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This move may have been a bit abrupt, but I found it odd we had only one Apes character article. It made the template look rather odd as well. If the whole Zaius article has been replicated on the List of Planet of the Apes characters page, as appears to be the case, then this should stand. - Gothicfilm (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that was my opinion - I only reverted because it was a major change without consensus, but I see no reason to revert again (as you said). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Cartman

Thebuck093 (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Eric Cartman is not a living person, but rather a fictional one. I do not understand exactly what error you think I have made; can you explain, please?[reply]

My apologies, I thought it was a real person. I've undone my revert (back to your initial edit), feel free to remove the warning I left on your talk page. Sorry for the inconvenience :). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Face

The snippet I added to the page Face is just as relevant as the part in the next thought about GWB's ears; it isn't necessary to add the part about the elephant's ears, but it is true nonetheless. That thought would be complete at "enlarged". Yet, it remains; so why does my factually accurate addition get removed? 24.179.34.43 (talk)

The addition needs to be WP:Verifiable as well as appropriate to the encyclopedia. I don't beleive that the addition about smelling pickles is appropriate, nor is it appropriate in the section you put it in. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't readd the information - it is not appropriate to the article or to the section you added it in. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The section about elephant ears is a reflection of what caricatures were made of George Bush. Smelling pickles has absolutely nothing to do with the section. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to revert me or the edit by 67.189.188.150? All you did was to remove my references. I'll leave it up to you. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, fixed now. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule!

The user has got many more warnings. Most probably 10–12 (if I count his photo upload warnings then more than 20). Plus he is doing WP:SOCK using 3-4 or more accounts. I have not reported WP:SOCK, since his main account has most number of edits in that article, so I am deliberately little slow here. Previously I was writing edit summary in details (do this, do that), but, now, I am just tired by saying same thing again and again that rowspan=1 is not necessary, WP:MIRROR should not be added, so, you'll find my latest edit summaries are short Author's name should not be editor's name etc etc. Please don't report WP:SOCK in case you get involved in this edit warring, It'll sad if he looses all his accounts. --Tito Dutta 12:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I noticed a whole heap of warnings, at least now there is a current lvl 4 and a 3RR warning, so if the disruptive editing continues it is easier and quicker to get the account blocked. I noticed that your summaries were getting shorter and more abrupt, hopefully the fact that another editor has warned him/her will make them think twice (which it seems to have done). I'll leave the WP:SOCK to you, though I do suggest that you report (but it's up to you). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They could have another complaint against me, I have removed 1 or 2 of his legitimate refs. But, I think it is a way to fool others. For example if in an edit I put 90% spam and only 10% legitimate information, you need to manually edit that page and remove 90% spam to save remaining 10% good information. They are doing the same thing. Previously I tried even that (manual editing). But, as, said, very tired now.
Also see references 5–16 here, firstly author's name should not be editor's name, second, mostly unreliable refs, thirdly, which I want to highlight, anyone can understand they are doing sock-puppetry by seeing their same edit style. But, generally sock-puppets generally try to hide that they are doing sock-puppetry. But, they are doing it openly, also leaving me messages from multiple accounts, I think it is more a foolishness, that's why I asked for not reporting. But, if you keep this page in your watchlist and he continues the same thing, I thing you will be also tired after few days. :) --Tito Dutta 13:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion is the same, as far as I am concerned that would be a "deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia" (from WP:Vandalism) given that you have tried to manually undo the bad ones and they were put back - have a look at my revision explaination: User:Callanecc/reversion. Have you warned the account/s about WP:SOCK (if you have and it doesn't stop I suggest reporting), also see WP:ILLEGIT (I think the behviour falls within this).
In any case it doesn't seem that s/he has edited again. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking of shamelessly stealing it from your page and put under my sub page, but I don't think it'll be necessary. I have posted some suggestions here: User_talk:Callanecc/reversion#Suggestion_on_July_07_2012 --Tito Dutta 14:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Posted a new message in User_talk:Callanecc/reversion#Suggestion_on_July_07_2012 --Tito Dutta 15:15, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at SwisterTwister's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Text From Dog

Mea culpa — I'm much better at speedying than remembering to close AFDs, sorry Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all, would you mind check to see if I did it correctly (this is the second one I've done)?. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine to me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

why dont you like the truth about hemet? this line added by: User:71.104.252.172, User talk:71.104.252.172 .

You are adding controversial original research. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 09:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

that is knowledge around the whole town. if you lived here then you would know. Counterargument? this line added by:

Original research is not permitted on Wikipedia, everything must be verifiable. To sign your posts on talk pages, just add four tildes (~~~~) - following is my signature. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.city -data .com/so/so-Hemet-California.html this is to show the sex offenders live in this town which i live in.71.104.252.172 (talk) 10:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC) fowling the rail road track on google map the train could take you all way to riverside71.104.252.172 (talk) 10:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even with that source I would be very hesitant to include it. But if you want you can propose it on the article's talk page - though I suspect it won't be included. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1943-mechanical-issues-not-to-blame-for-crash-outside-of-high-school, http://thevalleychronicle .com/opinion/item/1913-letter-to-the-editor, http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1939-crime-reports-throughout-the-san-jacinto-valley, http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1521-hemet-man-charged-with-sexual-abuse 71.104.252.172 (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You need to suggest the changes on the article's talk page, not here. Write what you want to add (a general summary) with reliable sources on the article's talk page and let other people comment on it. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was updating info on vaccine page....guess it hit highlight all thanks for undoing it also....how do you remove up adds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.77.216 (talk) 11:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're asking, could you rephrase it please?. Also make sure you sign your comments on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) after what you write. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An Wikipedia kitten for you!

Thank you for removing vandalism from my user page. It is the very first vandalism. I consider it a red badge of courage.

Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CVUA

Hello and Welcome to the CVUA! Please add yourself to the status page. Thank you, Electriccatfish2 (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at Kangaroopower's talk page.
Message added 23:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Kangaroopowah 23:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Regal Hello

Now that you're officially a member of the CVUA Staff, I just wanted to extend a huge welcome from me, deputy coordinator, as well as Dan653 and Achowat, coordinators. Please watch all pages related the the CVUA (don't forget the Wikipedia Talk pages as well!), and if you see a student you'd like sign up on the enroll page, by all means, snag 'em! Happy editing, and all the best from the crew here. Let us know if you ever have any questions! :) Theopolisme TALK 02:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC) [reply]

And a regal bow in return :). Thanks very much, and I look forward to grabbing my first student. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pizzighettone and Pergolettese

Pizzighettone has changed its name in U.S. Pergolettese and so the page should be referred to the new page that contains the story of the original club. The previous changes have been made ​​without any consensus and not referenced, they would. http://www.cremaonline.it/articolo.asp?ID=18364 http://www.e-cremonaweb.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1669:si-chiama-pergolettese-1932-soluzione-trovata-grazie-ad-alloni&catid=116:attualita&Itemid=477 --93.56.244.167 (talk) 07:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you still propose it on one or both of the articles. As the community will need to make a decision on what to do with the two articles. It will probably be a straight-forward discussion which will support your redirect, but with major changes it's better to discuss it first. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The practice in these cases is to make the redirect as in recent cases of A.S. Pro Belvedere Vercelli and G.S. Capriatese; otherwise you have two pages with the same information. --93.56.244.167 (talk) 07:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, feel free to add the redirects back. But make sure you leave an explainatory edit summary. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sodium chloride

I can revedelete but not oversight. Such edits are coming daily, especially from around India (this one was from Bangladesh and about Bangladesh) and are typically just reverted. Materialscientist (talk) 07:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I knew that bit :). Ok thanks for the info. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Identity

I see you warned the IP about this. In fact, the IP was correct and I'm sorry I didn't fix it earlier. I've sourced it now. Dougweller (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral of Saint Mel in Ardagh

Hi there,

I'm not very familiar with editing on Wikipedia and have only recently come to use the messaging system here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeomoonwalker (talkcontribs) 12:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can ignore that message, I took a different course of action. Though from your comment you should read WP:NOTSOAPBOX and particularly WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. Let me know if you want any help or advice in the future (and well done with signing your message). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. I have read the articles you suggested and I see what you mean. So to be clear, even though this archaeological site was once a cathedral, this does not allow for the near duplication of the title St. Mel's Cathedral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeomoonwalker (talkcontribs) 22:52, 9 July 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

No worries, my suggestion would be that it is added into the article I redirected to. For example, under a section header of "==History==" or "==Archaeology==". Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Missed something, make sure you sign all comments you make on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at Bgpaulus's talk page.
Message added 13:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bgpaulus (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at Bgpaulus's talk page.
Message added 18:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Replied to two different conversation threads, which have also been changed from sections to sub-sections. Bgpaulus (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Molly_Pitcher

not sure if usable for Wiki. Interesting historical marker of the land where the water was drawn for the battle.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/417256/thread/1341788571/Sometimes+We+Do+Not+Realize+What+Is+Right+In+Front+Of+Us...

162.58.82.135 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)lostdiver61@yahoo.com[reply]

I wouldn't use it as a reference (see self-published sources & BLP self-published sources), but the image might be a useful additon to the article. Although files aren't my area, see image use policy, and the File Upload Wizard. Sorry I couldn't be more help, maybe try the help desk if you need more info. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message at my talk!

Here is the message: User_talk:Titodutta#July_2012 --Tito Dutta 04:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO

THE PAGE IN QUESTION IS MY COUSIN AND IM TRYING TO CORRECT IT SHINA RAMBO WAS NEVER A BANDIT HE IS ABOUT 20 YEARS OLD SO HOW CAN HE BE BORN IN THE 60S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toluaina (talkcontribs) 13:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite possible that your cousin has the same name, but the bio for this person is reflected in the references & a Google search. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:14, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also make sure you don't write all in capitals as this can be read as shouting (which is obviously incivil) see WP:SHOUT. Also make sure you sign any comments you write on talk pages (when it says "talk" in the article title) with four tildes (~~~~). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ok
http://www.notjustok.com/2012/03/02/video-hkn-gang-davido-shina-rambo-b-red-on-factory78/
thats my cousin shina rambo
and you know how it is when media starts using this against them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toluaina (talkcontribs) 13:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DUDE WTF

My edit to the acion theater WAS NOT vandalism i put it there for informational perposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.172.135.130 (talk) 13:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reason it was reverted by both the bot and myself is that you added it as part of the reference, you need to add it outside the "</ref>" tag. Also I don't believe that that would be an appropriate additon to the article, nor is it in the formal tone which is expected. Not knowing the article the thing about the motion seats being removed may be notable. However you need to have a reliable source as original research shouldn't be included.
You need to be careful how you word messages to other editors as it can be seen as a personal attack or incivility (refering to "WTF"), not that I consider it to be as such - just be careful.
Also make sure you sign your comments on talk pages (which have "talk" in the title) with four tildes (~~~~) after what you write. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, thank you for not adding it straight back after my revert - well done :). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Ill find a source 24.172.135.130 (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, good job with signature :). Also note that another editor has reinserted the information so you just need to insert a source (and remove the {{Cn}} tag and possibly reword it. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here i found a source but i dont know exactly how to put it in heres the link http://www.themeparktourist.com/news/20120419/6550/kings-islands-dinosaurs-alive-3d-movie-be-free-2012-season 24.172.135.130 (talk) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]