Talk:¡Tré!: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:29, 1 October 2012

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Alternative music Unassessed

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Albums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Green Day (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Day, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green DayWikipedia:WikiProject Green DayTemplate:WikiProject Green DayGreen Day articles

Proposal for Deletion

I find it unnecessary for ¡Tré! to have a page if ¡Dos! doesn't have one yet. Either make one for ¡Dos! or delete this one please. --173.218.215.70 (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, especially since most of the text has been copied from ¡Uno!'s article. Alec scheat (talk) 10:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An article for ¡Dos! should be created and this should be deleted. Similarly to how ¡Uno! was the only one with an article for months. If all of them exist at one time, much of the three articles will be the same. ¡Dos!'s article should be created and ¡Tré! should wait after the release of ¡Dos!. -- Lar409 17:34, September 26 2012 —Preceding undated comment added 21:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i created Dos since Uno is out. We should wait until Dos comes out to do the same with Tre and especially since this is a direct copy. Either edit it and add the cover and some small details and have it a stub article of some sort or just completely wait until Dos comes out and do the same thing as Dos. BlackDragon 02:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just merge all three articles into one when they have all come out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.220.223 (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like the Use Your Illusion albums, these are seperate albums, so they should have seperate articles. Alec scheat (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracklisting

Not only are the tracklisting on this album and Dos are unsourced, but there's no sources on songs' lengths. I suggest maybe changing the tracklistings to confirmed songs, until the band releases an official tracklisting. Alec scheat (talk) 02:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Why not just merge all three articles into one when they have all come out?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.229.220.223|99.229.220.223]] ([[User talk:99.229.220.223|talk]]) 17:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :Like the Use Your Illusion albums, these are seperate albums, so they should have seperate articles. [[User:Alec scheat|Alec scheat]] ([[User talk:Alec scheat|talk]]) 02:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
+== Tracklisting ==
+Not only are the tracklisting on this album and Dos are unsourced, but there's no sources on songs' lengths. I suggest maybe changing the tracklistings to confirmed songs, until the band releases an official tracklisting. [[User:Alec scheat|Alec scheat]] ([[User talk:Alec scheat|talk]]) 02:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)