Jump to content

User talk:Peacemaker67: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
→‎Edit warring: new section
Line 93: Line 93:
</div>
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0399 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0399 -->

== Edit warring ==

I see the point for that, thank you for informing me. I would like to ask you for a little favour. Before a month and a half ago the user [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] started edit war with me reversing all my contributions. Can you please report that as well, because I am not that good user of wikipedia and I still don't know how to do that. Hvala. Pozdrav! :) [[User:Proudbulgarian|Proudbulgarian]] ([[User talk:Proudbulgarian|talk]]) 12:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:20, 7 November 2012

G'day. If you've got something to say, say it. Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peacemaker67, you are invited!

RE:POV Tag on Draza Mihailovic article

 Done

Articles requested per fair use

Ante Paveliċ, Charisma and National Mission in Wartime Croatia

The distant observers? Towards the politics of diasporic identification

WEHRMACHT PERCEPTIONS OF MASS VIOLENCE IN CROATIA, 1941–1942

Please let me know if you have issues or when you are done. Churn and change (talk) 04:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Got em thanks! Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jevdjevic image

The Serbo-Croatian wikipedia has a better image that I think we should use for the infobox. It has him with a cap that's more familiar with the Chetniks and even his medal is visible. What do you think? There's also an interesting image of Jedjevic with the Italians there. --PRODUCER (TALK) 13:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

definitely a better image, what about the licensing? Peacemaker67 (send, over) 20:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
and the second pic is also a good one for the Case White section, but again, is the licensing up to snuff? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 11:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A NFR license could always be used for the new infobox image and the old one would be removed from the article and put up for speedy deletion. I think a Croatian PD license could be used since technically they were on NDH soil at the time and "it is an anonymous work and it was published before January 1st, 1949". In the second image you have the Italians with Jedjevic so I'm leaning towards them having the camera and taking the "simple photograph" so an Italian PD license could also apply. --PRODUCER (TALK) 13:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The portrait as non-free and the other as PD-Italy. It's probably worth you having a look to make sure you agree with the way I did it. They'll get scrutinised in a ACR. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 04:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They look good to me. I think the article's ready. --PRODUCER (TALK) 12:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want to do the honours? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --PRODUCER (TALK) 12:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An Award for You!

The Content Review Medal of Merit  
For your reviews of GA and A class military articles, I am pleased to award you the Content Review Medal Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, cheers for that! Peacemaker67 (send, over) 11:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dobroslav Jevdjevic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dobroslav Jevdjevic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

Edit warring

I see the point for that, thank you for informing me. I would like to ask you for a little favour. Before a month and a half ago the user Edward321 started edit war with me reversing all my contributions. Can you please report that as well, because I am not that good user of wikipedia and I still don't know how to do that. Hvala. Pozdrav! :) Proudbulgarian (talk) 12:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]