Jump to content

Nucular: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Untrue, which is presumably why the citation isn't an actual link. The word "nucular" does not exist and can not be found in any dictionary.
Removed Lexical from title of Notes section as it relates to actual words, not mispronunciations (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lexical)
Line 9: Line 9:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


==Lexical notes==
==Notes==


''[[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]]'':
''[[Merriam-Webster|Merriam-Webster Dictionary]]:''<ref>[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/nuclear nuclear - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
: "Though disapproved of by many, pronunciations ending in \-kyə-lər\ have been found in widespread use among educated speakers, including scientists, lawyers, professors, congressmen, United States cabinet members, and at least two United States presidents and one vice president. While most common in the United States, these pronunciations have also been heard from British and Canadian speakers."
: "Though disapproved of by many, pronunciations ending in \-kyə-lər\ have been found in widespread use among educated speakers, including scientists, lawyers, professors, congressmen, United States cabinet members, and at least two United States presidents and one vice president. While most common in the United States, these pronunciations have also been heard from British and Canadian speakers." <ref>[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/nuclear nuclear - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>


''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'':
''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'':

Revision as of 09:40, 9 January 2013

While most dictionaries do not list the pronunciation as correct, some recognize it because of its increased usage.[1]

Notes

Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

"Though disapproved of by many, pronunciations ending in \-kyə-lər\ have been found in widespread use among educated speakers, including scientists, lawyers, professors, congressmen, United States cabinet members, and at least two United States presidents and one vice president. While most common in the United States, these pronunciations have also been heard from British and Canadian speakers." [2]

Oxford English Dictionary:

"The colloquial pronunciation...has been criticized in usage guides since at least the mid-20th century, although it is now commonly given as a variant in modern dictionaries."

Oxford American Dictionary:

"A variant pronunciation...has been used by many, but is widely regarded as unacceptable."

American Heritage Dictionary:

"The pronunciation (noo'kyə-lər), which is generally considered incorrect, is an example of how a familiar phonological pattern can influence an unfamiliar one … [since] much more common is the similar sequence (-kyə-lər), which occurs in words like particular, circular, spectacular, and in many scientific words like molecular, ocular, and vascular."

Merriam-Webster receive enough questions about their inclusion of this pronunciation in the dictionary that it is one of two pronunciations which receive particular mention in their FAQ (along with "February").[3]

Notable users

U.S. presidents who have used this pronunciation include Dwight D. Eisenhower, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton,[4] and George W. Bush. Others who have used this pronunciation include Vice Presidents Walter Mondale and Dick Cheney, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, Star Trek actor DeForest Kelley,[5] actor Kiefer Sutherland in his role as Jack Bauer in the TV series 24, Homer Simpson and Professor Marcus du Sautoy in a 2011 BBC documentary called "Faster Than The Speed Of Light".[6]

Motivation

Steven Pinker has proposed a phonotactic explanation for the conversion of nuclear to nucular: the unusual and disfavored sequence [kli.ər] is gradually transformed to a more acceptable configuration via metathesis. However, Arnold Zwicky notes that [kli.ər] presents no difficulty for English speakers in words such as pricklier. He also regards the proposition of metathesis as unnecessary. Zwicky suggests a morphological origin, combining the slang nuke with the common sequence -cular (molecular, particular, etc.).[7] Supporting Zwicky's hypothesis, Geoffrey Nunberg quotes a government weapons specialist: "Oh, I only say 'nucular' when I'm talking about nukes."[8] Nunberg argues that this pronunciation by weapons specialists and by politicians such as Bush – who are aware of the more accepted pronunciation – may be a "deliberate choice". He suggests that the reasons for this choice are to "assert authority" or to sound folksy.

See also

References

Listen to this article
(2 parts, 5 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.
  1. ^ Arnold Zwicky (June 29 2004). "The thin line between error and mere variation". Retrieved 2006-10-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ nuclear - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
  3. ^ "Your pronunciations of "February" and "nuclear" are wrong! How can you say they are correct?". Merriam-Webster online. Retrieved 2006-10-23.
  4. ^ Kate Taylor. "Why Does Bush Go "Nucular"?". Slate. Retrieved 2008-10-28.
  5. ^ Rioux, Terry Lee (2005). From sawdust to stardust: the biography of DeForest Kelley, Star trek's Dr. McCoy. Simon and Schuster. p. 218. ISBN 0-7434-5762-5. {{cite book}}: More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)
  6. ^ [1][dead link]
  7. ^ Zwicky, Arnold (March 21, 2005). "Axe a stupid question". Retrieved 2008-09-14.
  8. ^ Nunberg, Geoffrey (October 2, 2002). "Going Nucular". Retrieved 2008-09-14.