Talk:Spanish Civil War/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• There's an unresolved neutrality tag due to systemic bias on the article for a while. As a result, the article no longer meets criterion 4 - "It follows the neutral point of view policy".

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

3. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I would like some proper comment on whether the section above is still actually biased, rather than merely asserting that it is based on the use of the neutrality tag. I believe that I have clarified and dealt with those concerns. If it were up to me I would simply remove it, but I am retiscent to do so myself where I have been part of the process. The criterion is that the article is actually not biased, and a tag itself can never be sufficient to show this. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 11:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)