Talk:Chitika: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:19, 28 February 2013

Companies Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 May 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This company is creating quite a buzz and, I believe, is worthy of an article. A Google Search for the name will give at least a review or two.

Yes, I agree they seem to have a lot of reviews for questionable activity such as exageration and lying about earnings. A Google Search for the this yields a worrying amount of complaints against the practices of this company.

Yes, but what is the company and what does it do? The article is very unclear on that. It needs to be written in a neutral, matter-of-fact tone. If the controversy or criticism about the company is notable that should be included too.

This article is not neutral at all. The content has been directly downloaded from chitika.com . The article needs to be rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.97.217.124 (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has come a long way since the COI flag - Is there a way to nominate removal of that flag? Is there any specific part of the article that would not warrant removal of the flag? It seems there is factual information provided by Chitika Inc as well as accurate, unbiased 3rd party references. Please advise. Terriannswa (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the products section which had no citations and had highly biased language. 173.76.4.194 (talk) 21:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:47, 16 February 2013 edit Robofish (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 99,579 edits added wikiproject template ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:19, 28 February 2013 edit undo 173.76.4.194 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	This article has come a long way since the COI flag - Is there a way to nominate removal of that flag? Is there any specific part of the article that would not warrant removal of the flag? It seems there is factual information provided by Chitika Inc as well as accurate, unbiased 3rd party references. Please advise. [[User:Terriannswa\|Terriannswa]] ([[User talk:Terriannswa\|talk]]) 15:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)		This article has come a long way since the COI flag - Is there a way to nominate removal of that flag? Is there any specific part of the article that would not warrant removal of the flag? It seems there is factual information provided by Chitika Inc as well as accurate, unbiased 3rd party references. Please advise. [[User:Terriannswa\|Terriannswa]] ([[User talk:Terriannswa\|talk]]) 15:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

			I removed the products section which had no citations and had highly biased language. [[Special:Contributions/173.76.4.194\|173.76.4.194]] ([[User talk:173.76.4.194\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)