Jump to content

Talk:2013 Indian Premier League: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Changed assessment status for WikiProject IPL (via AssessmentBar)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP IPL|class=start|importance=high}}
{{WP IPL|class=c|importance=high|assess-date=April 2013}}
{{WP India
{{WP India
|class=start
|class=start

Revision as of 07:00, 20 April 2013

WikiProject iconIndian Premier League C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian Premier League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the Indian Premier League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCricket Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
Article assessment
Verifiability
Cleanup
Infoboxes
Cricket people
Cricket teams & countries
Images
On this day in cricket
Umpires
Women
Update
Other

I have cited the source for Gujarat Gaurav i will be removing the citations tag from this article.

gujrat team

Gujrat may play or may not. This is speculation thus i think we should remove the fact that pakistani players will be playing as this is not a certainty. Please let me know what you think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igodspeed (talkcontribs) 09:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I recomment removing the part that says that pakistan will be playing as the the citations title say "Gujarat likely to field a team in IPL next season. According to Times of India, Pakistani cricket players are likely to take part in this year's DLF IPL with the inclusion of Gujrat." However the webpage is about "Gujarat likely to field a team in IPL next season". There was no mention of pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igodspeed (talkcontribs) 09:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teams and standings

I don't think we should have a no result column. That is because on April 7, a tie-breaking method was used at the end of the match between Hyderabad and Bangalore and probably will be whenever there is a tie. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I quite disagree in this since although IPL matches can never end with no result but match can be abandoned due to rain like it happened in the earlier editions. I think the column should be there for this reason. Tolly4bolly 14:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]