Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:
== Errors in the [[Template:Did you know|current]] or [[Template:Did you know/Queue/{{Did you know/Queue/Next}}|next]] ''Did you know...''==
== Errors in the [[Template:Did you know|current]] or [[Template:Did you know/Queue/{{Did you know/Queue/Next}}|next]] ''Did you know...''==
{{DYK-Refresh}}{{anchor|DYK}}<!-- Please edit after this line, thanks --><br />
{{DYK-Refresh}}{{anchor|DYK}}<!-- Please edit after this line, thanks --><br />

=== All Saints' Church, Winthorpe ===

Surely it would be better to use "roofless" as in the article, rather than "topless". Unless, of course, you *are* trying to amuse your male, teenaged readers :-)

[[Special:Contributions/132.244.72.6|132.244.72.6]] ([[User talk:132.244.72.6|talk]]) 08:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


== Errors in [[Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|today's]] or [[Wikipedia:On this day/Tomorrow|tomorrow's]] ''On this day...'' ==<!-- leave this line alone, please! -->
== Errors in [[Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|today's]] or [[Wikipedia:On this day/Tomorrow|tomorrow's]] ''On this day...'' ==<!-- leave this line alone, please! -->

Revision as of 08:21, 2 May 2013

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 09:49 on 1 December 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of today's or tomorrow's featured article

Errors in In the news

Template:ITN-Update I find the usage of "gay" in the Jason Collins story to be too colloquial for an encyclopedia. The link is to "homosexuality", is there any reason that the word "homosexual" couldn't be used? The term "come out" is also fairly colloquial, but that at least links to an article actually named "coming out". --Khajidha (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think at this point, the term "gay" has lost its colloquialism. I think it's probably the best word. "Come out as homosexual" sounds like something from the '90's to my ear. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not that it's directly related, but "gay" is the PC term now. Ryan Vesey 19:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The blurbs on ITN occasionally astonish me: this entry on 'Great Mosque of Aleppo' is one. Is it really necessary to reiterate that the Great Mosque of Aleppo is in, of all places, Aleppo? Anyway, as it's about to fall off, I guess my point is becoming moot. -- Ohconfucius ping / poke 19:17, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Without repeating the name of the city, we would have a hard time linking it, which is quite important to the blurb. One could go with Great Mosque of Aleppo, but I don't believe it's called just the "Great Mosque" on its own and I don't believe the ways it's currently worded looks odd at all. -- tariqabjotu 19:52, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Given that "Great Mosque of Aleppo" is linked and "civil war fighting" is linked to Battle of Aleppo (2012–13), I don't see why "Aleppo" needs to be stated again in isolation and linked. The city itself is not as relevant to the item as the fighting in/for the city. The item could probably be worded better to "reveal" the Battle of Aleppo in that link. - dcljr (talk) 22:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The European Union passes a two-year ban on neonicotinoid insecticides, which are suspected to be the primary cause of colony collapse disorder. Neither references specificialy mention colony collapse in the article neonicotinoid, concern has been for the drop in bee numbers possibly from colony collapse, or from lack of Queens or from the quality of Queens. All three should be listed or the news should be changed to (e.g.) ... which are suspected to be the primary cause of the collapse of honey bee numbers throughout the world to reflect what is actually happening. Me, a beekeeper in UK Edmund Patrick confer 05:57, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in the current or next Did you know...


All Saints' Church, Winthorpe

Surely it would be better to use "roofless" as in the article, rather than "topless". Unless, of course, you *are* trying to amuse your male, teenaged readers :-)

132.244.72.6 (talk) 08:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in today's or tomorrow's On this day...

No mention of May Day?Applejuicefool (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not when it has had a {{refimprove}} template on it for the last year. BencherliteTalk 20:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While a good point, that doesn't make it *not* May Day.Applejuicefool (talk) 23:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't that say "expected to be worth over $80 billion"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.154.196 (talk) 02:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any other problems

Please report any other problems on General discussion part of Talk: Main Page.